The Case “Manoharan et al. v. Rajapaksa” and Immunity of Heads of State from Foreign Jurisdiction
https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2011-4-77-99
Abstract
The author explores legal prospects of a civil complaint filed in January 2011 in the U.S. district court for the District of Columbia against the incumbent President of Sri-Lanka. Plaintiffs accuse Percy Mahendra Rajapaksa of sanctioning extrajudicial killings of their relatives during the civil war with Tamil separatists. In this connection, the author examines current international law and legal writings relating to the personal immunities of incumbent heads of state from foreign criminal and civil jurisdiction, as well as practice of U.S. courts in this field. She describes the history and contents of a U.S. common-law doctrine of head-of-state immunity. Special attention is given to the question whether senior State officials preserve their immunities ratione personae when they commit such serious international crimes, as torture and extrajudicial killings.
About the Author
S. V. Shatalova
Russian Embassy in the United States of America
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Svetlana V. Shatalova ‒ Third Secretary
References
1. Шаталова С.В. Решение Верховного суда США по делу «Самантар против Юсуфа» и иммунитеты иностранных должностных лиц // Московский журнал международного права. № 1 (81). 2011. с. 110-130.
2. Cassese A. “When May Senior State Officials be Tried for International Crimes? Some Comments on The Congo v. Belgium Case,” EJIL, No. 13 (2002).
3. Day, A. Crimes Against Humanity as a Nexus of Individual and State Responsibility: Why the ICJ got Belgium v. Congo wrong // Berkeley Journal of International Law. Vol. 22 (2004).
4. Kessedjian C. Immunités // Encyclopédie Dalloz. Répertoire de Droit International. Editions Dalloz.
5. Spinedi, M. State Responsibility v. Individual Responsibility for International Crimes: Tertium Non Datur? // EJIL. Vol. 13 (2002). No. 4.
6. Totten Ch. Head-of-State Immunity and Foreign Official Immunity in the United States After Samanatar: A Suggested Approach // 34 Fordham Int’l L.J. 332 2010-2011.
7. Tunks, M.A. Diplomats or Defendants? Defining the Future of Head of State Immunity // Duke Law Journal, Vol. 52 (2002).
8. Verhoeven J., Les immunités de jurisdiction et d’exécution. Rapport provisoire. Décembre 2000 // Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit international. Vol. 69 (2000-2001).
9. Watts, A. The Legal Position in International Law of Heads of States, Heads of Governments and Foreign Ministers // RdC, Vol. 247 (1994-III).
10. Wirth, S. Immunity for Core Crimes? The ICJ’s Judgment in the Congo v. Belgium Case // EJIL. Vol. 13 (2002). No. 4.
Review
For citations:
Shatalova S.V. The Case “Manoharan et al. v. Rajapaksa” and Immunity of Heads of State from Foreign Jurisdiction. Moscow Journal of International Law. 2011;(4):77-99. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2011-4-77-99
Views:
530
Email this article 