Interpretive Guidance of the International Committee of the Red Cross on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities: pro et contra
https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2011-4-19-36
Abstract
Among the main advantages of the Guidance the author distinguishes a classification of persons in non-international armed conflicts, use of the purpose as a defining feature of the notion of “hostilities”, inclusion of unlawful attacks against the civilian purposes in this notion, application of the principle of military necessity as one of the restrictions of the use of force. Several issues of the Guidance are subjected to criticism: a limited scope of application of the minimum threshold requirement to the harm, a dogmatic position on absolute impossibility of qualification of attacks on the persons under authority of a party to the conflict as “hostilities”, a requirement of existence of a link between a civilian and a party to the conflict, elusion from qualification of general planning and leadership. Finally, the author comes to the conclusion that the process of clarification of the notion “direct participation in hostilities” should be continued.
About the Author
V. N. Rusinova
Baltic Federal Immanuel Kant University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vera N. Rusinova ‒ Ph.D. in Law, LL.M. (Göttingen), Head of the Chair of International and European Law
References
1. Санкт-Петербургская декларация об отмене употребления взрывчатых и зажигательных пуль. 29 ноября 1868 г. / Ведение военных действий. Сборник Гаагских конвенций и иных международных документов. МККК, 2004.
2. Женевские конвенции от 12 августа 1949 г.: об улучшении участи раненых и больных в действующих армиях; об улучшении участи раненых, больных и лиц, потерпевших кораблекрушение, из состава вооруженных сил на море; об обращении с военнопленными; о защите гражданского населения во время войны // Действующее международное право. Т. 2. С. 603, 625, 634, 681.
3. Дополнительный протокол I к Женевским конвенциям от 12 августа 1949 г., касающийся защиты жертв международных вооруженных конфликтов, от 8 июня 1977 г. // Действующее международное право / Сост. Ю.М. Колосов, Э.С. Кривчикова. В 3-х т. М., 1999. Т. 2. С. 731.
4. Дополнительный протокол II к Женевским конвенциям от 12 августа 1949 г., касающийся защиты жертв вооруженных конфликтов немеждународного характера, от 8 июня 1977 г. // Действующее международное право. Т. 2. С. 793.
5. Instructions for the Government of Armies of the United States in the Field (Lieber Code). 24 April 1863 // Schindler D. and Toman J. The Laws of Armed Conflicts. Dordrecht, 1988.
6. Cassese A. On Some Merits of the Israeli Judgment on Targeted Killings // Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2007. Vol. 5.
7. Draper G.I.A.D. Military Necessity and Humanitarian Imperatives // Revue de Droit Penal Militaire et de Droit de la Guerre. 1973. Vol. 12.
8. Fenrick W.J. ICRC Guidance on Direct Participation in Hostilities // Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law. 2009 (2010). Vol. 12.
9. Garner J.W. The German War Code // University of Illinois Bulletin. 5 August 1918. Vol. XV. № 49.
10. Goodman R. The Detention of Civilians in Armed Conflict // American Journal of International Law. 2009. Vol. 103.
11. Goodman R., Jinks D. The ICRC Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities under International Humanitarian Law: An Introduction to the Forum // New York University Journal of International Law and Politics. 2010. Vol. 42.
12. Henckaerts J.-M., Doswald-Beck L. Customary International Humanitarian Law. Vol. 1. Rules. Cambridge, 2005.
13. Commentary to the Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 / Ed. by C. Pilloud, Y. Sandoz, Ch. Swinarsky. ICRC,1987.
14. International Institute of Humanitarian Law, The Manual on the Law of Non-International Armed Conflict. Sanremo, 2006.
15. Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities under International Humanitarian Law. ICRC, 2009.
16. Melzer N. Military Necessity and Humanity: A Response to Four Critiques of the ICRC’s Interpretative Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities // New York University Journal of International Law and Politics. 2010. Vol. 42.
17. Targeting, in: Perspectives on the ICRC Study on Customary International Humanitarian Law. Cambridge, 2007.
18. New Rules for Victims of Armed Conflicts. Commentary on the Two 1977 Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 / Ed. by M. Bothe, K.J. Partsch, W.A. Solf. The Hague/ Boston/ London, 1982.
19. Melzer N. Military Necessity and Humanity: A Response to Four Critiques of the ICRC’s Interpretative Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities // New York University Journal of International Law and Politics. 2010. Vol. 42.
20. Parks H. Part IX of the ICRC “Direct Participation in Hostilities Study”: No Mandate, No Expertise, and Legally Incorrect // New York University Journal of International Law and Politics. 2010. Vol. 42.
21. Pictet J. Development and Principles of International Humanitarian Law. Geneva, 1985.
22. Pomper S. Direct Participation in Hostilities: Operationalizing the International Committee of the Red Cross’ Guidance // American Society of International Law Proceedings. 2010. Vol. 103.
23. Sassoli M. Bedeutung einer Kodifikation für das allgemeine Völkerrecht: mit besonderer Betrachtung der Regeln zum Schutze der Zivilbevölkerung vor den Auswirkungen von Feindseligkeiten. Basel/Frankfurt a.M., 1990.
24. Sassoli M. Combatants, in: Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, http://www.mpepil.com.
25. Schmit M.N. Targeting, in: Perspectives on the ICRC Study on Customary International Humanitarian Law. Cambridge, 2007.
26. Schmitt M. “Direct Participation in Hostilities” and 21st Century Armed Conflict, in: Krisensicherung und Humanitärer Schutz – Crisis Management and Humanitarian Protection. Festschrift für Dieter Fleck / Ed. by H. Fischer, U. Froissart, W. Heintschel von Heinegg, Ch. Raap. Berlin, 2004.
27. Schmitt M. Deconstructing Direct Participation in Hostilities: the Constitutive Elements // New York University Journal of International Law and Politics. 2010. Vol. 42.
28. Schmitt M. Wired Warfare: Computer Network Attack and Jus in bello // International Review of the Red Cross. 2002. Vol. 84. № 846.
29. Solis G. The Law of Armed Conflict: International Humanitarian Law in War. Cambridge, 2010.
Review
For citations:
Rusinova V.N. Interpretive Guidance of the International Committee of the Red Cross on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities: pro et contra. Moscow Journal of International Law. 2011;(4):19-36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2011-4-19-36
Views:
668
Email this article 