International Legal Measures to Ensure the Safety of Navigation
https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2021-1-81-88
Abstract
INTRODUCTION. The development of public relations in the field of international trade transportation presupposes new conditions for their safety. This work represents a failure of an attempt to conduct such a study and a comprehensive understanding of the problems existing in this area, as well as the search for ways to solve them by international legal mechanisms. In parallel, certain organizational and legal measures were proposed, and the problems of certain aspects of merchant shipping were also raised.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. For the preparation of this work, the normative legal acts, both domestic and international, were considered, the positions of scientists – representatives of different states. A comparison of legal norms and practice of their application was carried out on the basis of available information materials. Within the framework of this work, methods of analysis, comparative legal method, deduction were also used. On this basis, the modeling of ways of possible optimization of the activities of subjects of international law, specializing in security issues, was carried out.
RESEARCH RESULTS. In essence, the content of the article is the main part devoted to the problems of ensuring the safety of maritime transportation, introductory and concluding parts. The latter reflects the main conclusion devoted to the formulation of the question of the possibility of combining the efforts of various actors to ensure the integrated safety of merchant shipping, which can be combined in a single international legal document. At the same time, it is not at all necessary to place special emphasis on mandatory law enforcement and other punitive measures. Economic and reputational mechanisms are quite applicable, stimulating the activities of states to create all the necessary conditions for safe navigation in the relevant waters.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS. The application of this proposal in practice can potentially have an organizational and legal impact on the policies of various states and individual subjects of commercial activity in terms of ensuring maximum protection of the widest range of subjects of sea trade.
About the Author
S. A. Vasiliev
Sevastopol State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Stanislav A. Vasiliev, Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor at the Department of Constitutional and Administrative Law
33, ul. Universitetskaya, Sevastopol, Russian Federation,
299053
References
1. Бекяшев К.А., Бекяшев Д.К. 2018. Новый междуна-
2. родно-правовой режим Каспийского моря. – Труды
3. ВНИРО. Т. 174. С. 129–142.
4. Вылегжанин А.Н. [и др.]. 2018. Позиции неарктических
5. государств в отношении правового режима Северно-
6. го Ледовитого океана. – Государство и право. № 10.
7. С. 124–135. DOI: 10.31857/S013207690002080-0
8. Глазова А.П. 2019. Историко-правовой анализ эволю-
9. ции института принудительных мер правоохрани-
10. тельного характера на море: прошлое и настоящее. –
11. Международное публичное и частное право. № 6.
12. С. 15–19.
13. Дремлюга Р.И. 2013. Международно-правовой режим
14. Черноморских проливов. – Lex Russica. Т. 95. № 10.
15. С. 1107–1114.
16. Емельянцев В.П., Валентей С.Д. 2020. Арктика в ракур-
17. се новейших законодательных инициатив. – Журнал
18. российского права. № 2. С. 136–153. DOI: 10.12737/
19. jrl.2020.023
20. Лабин Д.К., Потье Т. 2019. Международное право долж-
21. но быть международным. Размышления о книге Антеи
22. Робертс «Является ли международное право между-
23. народным?». – Московский журнал международного
24. права. № 4. С. 6–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-
25. -2019-4-6-17
26. Никитина А.П. 2019. Государственное регулирова-
27. ние деятельности морских портов (на примере ФГУП
28. «Росморпорт»). – Государственная власть и местное
29. самоуправление. № 10. С. 35–39. DOI: 10.18572/1813-
30. -2019-10-35-39
31. Тишков С.А., Лабин Д.К. 2019. Институциализация по-
32. лицейского миротворчества ООН. – Вестник МГИМО
33. Университета. № 1. С. 107–128. DOI: https://doi.
34. org/10.24833/2071-8160-2019-1-64-107--128
35. Притчин С.А. 2015. Сотрудничество России и ИРАНА в
36. регионе Каспийского моря: новые тенденции и пер-
37. спективы. – Российско-иранские отношения. Пробле-
38. мы и перспективы. Сборник статей международной
39. конференции. Под ред. Е.В. Дунаевой, В.И. Сажина. М.:
40. Институт востоковедения РАН. С. 75–82.
41. Anozie C. [et al.]. 2019. Ocean governance, integrated
42. maritime security and its impact in the Gulf of Guinea: a
43. lesson for Nigeria’s maritime sector and economy. – Africa
44. Review. Vol. 11. Issue 2. P. 190–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10
45. .1080/09744053.2019.1631640
46. Debroux T. 2019. The Abe administration’s policy about
47. the senkaku islands and a role theory. – Journal Global
48. Policy and Governance. Vol. 8. No.1 P. 83–100. DOI: https://
49. doi.org/10.14666/2194-7759-8-1-005
50. Gladki Yu.N. [et al.]. 2020. “Polar Silk road”: Project implementation
51. and geo-economic interests of Russia
52. and China. – IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Vol. 434. No. 012009. DOI:10.1088/1755-
53. /434/1/012009. URL: https://iopscience.iop.org/
54. article/10.1088/1755-1315/434/1/012009/pdf (accessed
55. 11.2020)
56. Hatakeyama K. 2019. A Middle Power's Roles in Shaping
57. East Asian Security Order: Analysis of Japan's Engagement
58. from a Normative Perspective. – Australian Journal of Politics
59. and History. Vol. 65. Issue 3. P. 466–481. DOI: https://
60. doi.org/10.1111/ajph.12592
61. Kim S.K. 2018. The expansion of and changes to the national
62. coast guards in East Asia. – Ocean Development and
63. International Law. Vol. 49. Issue 4. P. 313-334. DOI: https://
64. doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2018.1502488
65. Koda Y. 2016. Maritime security in the region: SCS and
66. ECS as key arenas for converging political interests. – Asia-
67. Pacific Review. Vol. 23. Issue 2. P. 86–108. DOI: https://doi.or
68. g/10.1080/13439006.2016.1256077
69. Li J. 2021. Development of BRICS cooperation mechanism
70. in new geopolitical conditions. – Proceedings of Topical
71. Issues in International Political Geography. Ed. by R. Bolgov
72. [et al.]. Cham: Springer. P. 303–312. DOI: https://doi.
73. org/10.1007/978-3-030-58263-0_27
74. Liu F. 2020. The recalibration of Chinese assertiveness:
75. China's responses to the Indo-Pacific challenge. – International
76. Affairs. Vol. 96. Issue 1. P. 9–27. DOI: https://doi.
77. org/10.1093/ia/iiz226
78. Singh S. 2019. The dilemmas of regional states: How
79. southeast Asian states view and respond to India-China
80. maritime competition. – Asian Security. Vol. 15. Issue 1.
81. P. 44–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2019.15
82.
83. Strating R. 2020. Small Power Hedging in an Era of Greatpower
84. Politics: Southeast Asian Responses to China’s Pursuit
85. of Energy Security. – Asian Studies Review. Vol. 44. Issue
86. P. 97–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2019.
87.
Review
For citations:
Vasiliev S.A. International Legal Measures to Ensure the Safety of Navigation. Moscow Journal of International Law. 2021;(1):81-88. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2021-1-81-88
Views:
1279
Email this article 