COMPENSATION OF MORAL DAMAGE IN PRACTICE THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2017-106-2-154-160
Abstract
The article is focused on particularities of approach of the European Court of Human Rights to consideration of validity of claims for compensation of moral damage to individuals. Within the framework of this article the author also concerns approach of the European Court of Human Rights to assessment of similar claims on compensation of moral damage to legal entities. Particularly, the author conducts analysis of approach used by the European Court of Human Rights in respect of definition of ‘moral damage’, methods and criteria of assessment of scope of damage subject to compensation, as well as definition of persons entitled to compensation of moral damage in its case consideration practice.
Moreover, for the purpose of comparative analysis the author concerns in this article law enforcement problems and deficiencies existing in the domestic legal regulation of the institute of moral damage compensation to individuals and – partly – to legal entities.
Moreover, for the purpose of comparative analysis the author concerns in this article law enforcement problems and deficiencies existing in the domestic legal regulation of the institute of moral damage compensation to individuals and – partly – to legal entities.
About the Author
M. F. BAGLARIDU
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) MFA Russia
Russian Federation
post-graduate student, Department of International and Civil Law
Russian Federation
post-graduate student, Department of International and Civil Law
References
1. Gavrilov E.V. Zapret kompensatsii moral’nogo vreda yuridicheskim litsam. Kommentariik Opredeleniyu Sudebnoi kollegii po ekonomicheskim sporam VS RF ot 17.08.2015 N 309-ES15-8331 [Prohibition of Compensation for Moral Harm to Legal entities. Commentary on the Decision of the Judicial Division on Economic Disputes of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation №. 309-ES15-8331 dated August 17 2015.]. - Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Bulletin of Economic Justice of the Russian Federation]. 2015. № 9. P. 18 - 21. (in Russ.)
2. Ivanov D.V., Taras’yants E.V. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo zashchity i pooshchreniya prav cheloveka: proshloe, nastoyashchee i budushchee (Chast’ 2) [The International Law of Protection and Promotion of Human Rights: Past, Present and Future (Part 2)]. – Moscow Journal of International Law. 2009. № 2 (71). P. 22-43. (in Russ.)
3. Rossiiskii ezhegodnik Evropeiskoi konventsii po pravam cheloveka [Russian Yearbook on the European Convention on Human Rights]. Moscow: Statut Publ. 2016. 656 p. (in Russ.)
4. Sitdikova L.B. Sudebnaya praktika Evropeiskogo suda po pravam cheloveka pri formirovanii nematerial’nogo reputatsionnogo vreda [Judicial practice of the European Court of Human Rights in Formation of Intangible Reputation Harm]. - Rossiiskii sud’ya [Russian Judge]. 2015. № 7. P. 39 – 43. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
BAGLARIDU M.F. COMPENSATION OF MORAL DAMAGE IN PRACTICE THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. Moscow Journal of International Law. 2017;106(2):154-160. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2017-106-2-154-160
Views:
3370
Email this article 