DOES INTERNATIONAL LAW REGULATE RELATIONS WITH PARTICIPATION OF INDIVIDUALS? PART 2
https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2017-106-2-3-17
Abstract
International legal norms can (under certain conditions) directly regulate relations with participation of individuals and legal entities). Based on the idea that the legal nature of the source of rules, governing social relations, determine the nature of the (generic and standard accessory) arising legal relations, as well as the personality of people involved, an as-sumptive conclusion is that individuals are subjects of international law, and the relationship with their participation - international inter-state relations. On the other hand, individuals are subjects of international law and relations including their participation are not international inter-state re-lations. The solution to this problem, which seems to be unsolvable, is associated, firstly, with the appearance as a new independent type of public relations cross-border social relations. Secondly, the fact that the basis of determination of this or that model is not a typical affiliation of regulations
or their source, but the subject and method of legal regulation. In appropriate cases, individuals and legal entities are subjects of cross-border relationships. As conflict and substantive rules of all legal systems licensed by each state to settle cross-border relations have started to participate in the mechanism of legal regulation of these relations, there was a formation of not a new type of legal system, but a new type of the structural elements of the law itself, which we call inter-system entities. Formations of this kind have become important elements of the law, and they even received the name of «law» (private international law, international customs law, international tax law etc.), although they are not legal systems or separate branches of national law. In appropriate cases, individuals and legal entities are not subjects of international law, but subjects of intersystem entities.
or their source, but the subject and method of legal regulation. In appropriate cases, individuals and legal entities are subjects of cross-border relationships. As conflict and substantive rules of all legal systems licensed by each state to settle cross-border relations have started to participate in the mechanism of legal regulation of these relations, there was a formation of not a new type of legal system, but a new type of the structural elements of the law itself, which we call inter-system entities. Formations of this kind have become important elements of the law, and they even received the name of «law» (private international law, international customs law, international tax law etc.), although they are not legal systems or separate branches of national law. In appropriate cases, individuals and legal entities are not subjects of international law, but subjects of intersystem entities.
About the Author
B. I. NEFEDOV
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) MFA Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Ago R. Teoria del diritto internazionale private. Parte generale. Padova: Cedam. 1934. 299 s.
2. Altenov I. Mezhdunarodno chastno-pravnata sistema na Narodna Republika Bulgariya [Private International Law System of People’s Republic of Bulgaria]. Sofiya: Bulgarskata Akademiya na naukite Publ. 1955. 406 p. (in Bulgarian)
3. Anufrieva L.P. Sootnoshenie mezhdunarodnogo publichnogo i mezhdunarod-nogo chast-nogo prava: pravovye kategorii [The Correlation between International Law and Private International Law: legal categories]. Moscow: Spark Publ. 2002. 415 p. (in Russ.)
4. Batiffol H., Lagarde P. Droit international prive. 8 ed. T 1. Paris: LGDJ. 1993. 656 p.
5. Bratus’ S.N., Vengerov A.B. Ponyatie i soderzhanie i formy sudebnoi prak-tiki [The Def-inition and Contents and Forms of Court Practice]. - Sudebnaya praktika v sovetskoi pravovoi sisteme [Court Practice in the Soviet Legal System]. Moscow: Yurid. lit. Publ. 1975. P. 8-74. (in Russ.)
6. Brun M.I. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe parvo [Private International Law]. - Zolotoi fond rossiiskoi nauki mezhdunarodnogo prava. T.1. [Golden Fund of Russian International Law Science. Vol. I]. Moscow: Mezhdunar. Otnosheniya Publ. 2009. P. 103-328. (in Russ.)
7. Cook W. W. The Logical and Legal Bases of the Conflict of Laws. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1942. 458р.
8. David R., Zhoffre-Spinozi K . Osnovnye pravovye sistemy sovremennosti [Main Legal Systems of Modernity]. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya Publ. 1997 400 p. (in Russ.)
9. Garrison М., Davis R., Reitzel J., Severance G. Contemporary Business Law and the Legal Environment. Principles and Cases. 5th ed. N.Y.: McGraw-Hill College. 1994. 1407 p.
10. Gasparevich I.Yu. 2008. Istoricheskoe razvitie kollizionnogo prava [Historical Development of Conflict of Laws]. - Problemy upravleniya [Problems of Governance]. 2008. №4 (29). P.113 -118. (in Russ.)
11. Grevtsova, T.P. Mezhdunarodnyi dogovor v sisteme istochnikov sovetskogo vnutrigosu-darstvennogo prava [International Treaty in the System of Sources of Municipal Law]. - Sovetskii ezhegodnik mezhdunarodnogo prava [Soviet Yearbook of International Law]. Moscow: Nauka Publ. 1965. P. 171 -179. (in Russ.)
12. Ignatenko G.V., Malinin S.A. Novye tendentsii v mezhdunarodnom normotvorchestve [New Tendencies in International Rulemaking]. - Sovetskii ezhegodnik mezhdunarodnogo prava [Soviet Yearbook of International Law]. Moscow: Nauka Publ. 1987. P. 32-46. (in Russ.)
13. Ivanov N.P. Osnovaniya chastnoi mezhdunarodnoi yurisdiktsii [The Bases for Private In-ternational Jurisdiction]. - Zolotoi fond rossiiskoi nauki mezhdunarodnogo prava. T. 2. [Golden Fund of Russian International Law Science. Vol. II]. Moscow: Mezhdunar. Otnosheniya Publ. 2009. P. 59-101. (in Russ.)
14. Kalensky P. Trends of private international law. Prague: Academia. 1971. 308 p.
15. Kegel G. Paternal Home and Dream Home: Traditional Conflict of Laws and the American Reformers. - American Journal of Comparative Law. 1979. Vol. 27. P. 616-621.
16. Khrabskov V.G. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo v sisteme obshchego mezhdunarodnogo prava [Private International Law in the System of International Law]. – Pravovedenie [Legal Studies]. 1982. № 6. P. 34-38. (in Russ.)
17. Kutikov V. Mezhdunarodno chastno pravo na Narodna Respublika Bulgariya [Private International Law of People’s Republic of Bulgaria]. Sofiya: Nauka i Izkustvo Pubk. 1976. 591 p. (in Bulgarian)
18. Levitin A.B. K voprosu o predmete mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava [About the Subject of Private International Law]. – Pravovedenie [Legal Studies]. 1959. № 3. P. 95-101. (in Russ.)
19. Lunts L.A. Sootnoshenie mezhdunarodnogo dogovora i vnutrigosudarstvennogo zakona v grazhdanskom i trudovom prave [The Correlation between International Treaty and Na-tional Law in Civil and Labor Law]. - Uchenye zapiski VNIISZ [Scientific Papers of VNIISZ]. 1968. Issue. 14. P. 220-232. (in Russ.)
20. Madl F., Vekas L. The Law of Conflicts and Foreign Trade. Budapest: Akademial Kiado. 1987. 380 p.
21. Meshera V.F. O mezhdunarodnom dogovore kak istochnike sovetskogo prava [About International Treaty as a Source of Soviet Law]. - Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Pravovedenie [The Papers of Higher Education Institutions. Legal Studies]. 1963. № 1.P. 124 - 126. (in Russ.)
22. Monastyrskii Yu.E. Nekotorye voprosy razresheniya sporov na osnove inostrannykh zakonov [Some Issues of Dispute Resolution under Foreign Legislation]. -Zakonodatel’stvo i ekonomika [Legislation and Economics]. 1994. № 19. P.10-20. (in Russ.)
23. Myullerson R.A. O sootnoshenii mezhdunarodnogo publichnogo, mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo i natsional’nogo prava [About the Correlation between Public and Private International Law]. - Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i parvo [Soviet State and Law]. 1982 № 2. P. 80-89. (in Russ.)
24. Nefedov, B.I. Triptikh. Mezhsistemnye obrazovaniya v prave. Chast’ 1[Triptych. Inter-system Formations in Law. Part 1]. - Evraziiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal [Eurasian Juridical Journal]. 2012a. № 8 (51). P. 35-38. (in Russ.)
25. Nefedov, B.I. Triptikh. Mezhsistemnye obrazovaniya v prave. Chast’ 2 [Triptych. Inter-system Formations in Law. Part 2]. - Evraziiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal [Eurasian Juridical Journal]. 2012b.№ 9 (52). P. 24-28. (in Russ.)
26. Nefedov, B.I..Triptikh. Mezhsistemnye obrazovaniya v prave. Chast’ 3 [Triptych. Inter-system Formations in Law. Part 3]. - Evraziiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal [Eurasian Juridical Journal]. 2012c.№ 10 (53). P. 59-63. (in Russ.)
27. North P. M.. Cheshire’s. Private International Law. London: Butterworths. 1974. 740 p.
28. Rubanov A.A. Teoreticheskie osnovy mezhdunarodnogo vzaimodeistviya natsional’nykh pravovykh system [Theore-tical Issues of International Cooperation of National Legal Systems]. Moscow: Nauka Publ. 1984. 159 p. (in Russ.)
29. Soliev I. M. K voprosu o teoreticheskikh osnovakh mezhdunarodnogo vzaimodeistviya natsional’nykh pravovykh sistem i primeneniya inostrannogo prava [On the Issue of Theoretical Grounds of International Mutual Interaction of National Legal Systems and Application of Foreign Law]. - Vestnik TGUPBP [Bulletin of TGUPBP]. 2012. №4 (52). P.45-56. (in Russ.)
30. Stalev Zh. Syshchnost’ i funktsiya na mezhdunarodnogo chastno pravo [The Essence and Functions of Private International Law]. Sofiya: Nauka i izkusstvo Publ. 1982. 296 p. (in Bulgarian)
31. Voronov A. F. Mezhdunarodnyi grazhdanskii protsess kak mezhsistemnyi kompleks [International Civil Procedure as an Intersystem Complex]. - Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 11: Pravo [Bulletin of Moscow State University. Series 11: Law]. 1987. № 3. P. 83–88. (in Russ.)
32. Zivs S.L. Istochniki prava [Sources of Law]. Moscow: Nauka Publ. 1981. 239 p. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
NEFEDOV B.I. DOES INTERNATIONAL LAW REGULATE RELATIONS WITH PARTICIPATION OF INDIVIDUALS? PART 2. Moscow Journal of International Law. 2017;106(2):3-17. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2017-106-2-3-17
Views:
2104
Email this article 