Interpretation of International Legal Norms regarding the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf in the Context of National Interests of Russia and other Arctic States

In some Russian publications, the Commission on the limits of the continental shelf established in accordance with the UN Convention on the law of the sea 1982 (UNCLOS), was authorized to resolve legal issues of delimitation of the continental shelf, for example, in a dispute in the Arctic ocean. In this article we prove the inferiority of such a conclusion. The Commission on the limits of the continental shelf, consisting of geologists and other experts in the field of natural Sciences, is not entitled to reach conclusions on legal questions relating to the delimitation of the continental shelf. Powers of the Commission our recommendation on compliance with the geological and geomorphological conditions according to the “delimitation” of the continental shelf of the state from the international seabed area. The separation of the concept of “delineation” and “delimitation” contributes to the correct interpretation of norms of the UNCLOS: in accordance with article 76 of the UNCLOS the functions of the Commission on “delineation” are not a prerequisite for the implementation by States of their rights to “delimitation” in accordance with article 83 of the UNCLOS. From the point of view of the dispute on the delimitation of the Arctic shelf, the attempts of some scholars to prove the existence of the legal mandate of the Commission allows for the possibility of ignoring beneficial for Russia a special legal circumstances, historically in the polar region. The implementation of these theoretical constructs contain the risk of territorial loss from the Arctic States parties to the UNCLOS. Coastal Arctic States there are no duties on the “delineation” of the continental shelf and international seabed area; they have no legal need to appeal to the Commission. The coastal state may exercise its right to “delimitation” the whole Arctic shelf in agreement with each other – without recourse to the Commission.

Arctic Ocean, United Nations Convention on the law of the sea 1982, the Commission on the limits of continental shelf, delimitation, delineation

1. Barsegov Ju.G. Mirovoj okean: pravo, politika, diplomatija [The oceans: law, politics, diplomacy] M. – Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija. – 1983. – s. 169-170.

2. Vylegzhanin A.N. Reshenija Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON po sporam o razgranichenii morskih prostranstv [The decision of the ICJ in disputes on Maritime delimitation] M. – Juridicheskaja literatura. – 2004. – s.96.

3. Vylegzhanin A.N. Pravovoe polozhenie arkticheskogo regiona v dokumentah./Arkticheskij region: problemy mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva[The legal status of the Arctic region in the documents./The Arctic region: problems of international cooperation] Hrestomatija v treh tomah. Tom 3. Primenimye pravovye istochniki. Glav.redaktor I.S.Ivanov. M. – 2013. – s. 11-38;

4. Vylegzhanin A.N., Molodcova E.S., Dudykina I.P. Zarubezhnye issledovanija prava, primenimogo k otgranicheniju (delineation) i razgranicheniju (delimitation) arkticheskogo shel’fa [Foreign studies law applicable to the delimitation (delineation) and the separation (delimitation) of the Arctic shelf] / Moskovskij zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava. – 2015 – №3 – s. 5-23.

5. Gureev S.A., Bunik I.V. Materialy kruglogo stola «Morskaja dejatel’nost’ Rossijskoj Federacii: sostojanie i problemy zakonodatel’nogo obespechenija» [Materials of the round table “Maritime activities of the Russian Federation: condition and problems of legislative maintenance”] /Vremennaja komissija po nacional’noj morskoj politike. Federal’noe Sobranie Soveta Federacii RF // Informacionnyj bjulleten’. – M. – 2005 – № 1.

6. Zhudro.I.S. Obychno-pravovye normy kak komponent unikal’nogo istoricheski slozhivshegosja statusa Arktiki [Rules of customary law as a component of the unique historical status of the Arctic] // Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Serija «Gumanitarnye i social’nye nauki» – 2014 – № 6.

7. Zhudro I.S. O modernizacii mezhdunarodno-pravovoj koncepcii obosnovanija vneshnih granic kontinental’nogo shel’fa Rossijskoj Federacii v Arktike [On the modernization of the international legal concept of substantiation of the outer limits of the continental shelf of the Russian Federation in the Arctic] // Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. IG «Jurist». – 2015 – № 6 (87).

8. Molodcov S.V. Pravovoj rezhim morskih vod [The legal regime of the sea waters] M. – «Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija ». – 1982 – s.215.

9. Nikolaev A.N., Peshhurov I.S. Pravovye vozmozhnosti predotvrashhenija poteri Rossiej vysokoshirotnogo uchastka arkticheskogo shel’fa [Legal possibilities to prevent the loss of Russia’s high-latitude area of the Arctic shelf] // Sovremennye proizvoditel’nye sily (SOPS RAN) Fundamental’nye issledovanija prostranstvennogo razvitija. – 2014. – № 1.

10. Punzhin S.M. Kontinental’nyj shel’f za predelami 200 mil’: opredelenie vneshnih granic i delimitacija [Continental shelf beyond 200 miles: the establishment of the outer limits and delimitation] – «Konsul’tantPljus» – 2015.

11. Rabochaja tetrad’. Predlozhenija k dorozhnoj karte razvitija mezhdunarodno-pravovyh osnov sotrudnichestva Rossii v Arktike [Workbook. Proposals for the road map for the development of international legal bases of cooperation of Russia in the Arctic] Ruk. avt.kollektiva d.ju.n. A.N.Vylegzhanin. Glav.redaktor d.i.n., chlen-korr. RAN I.S.Ivanov. Rossijskij sovet po mezhdunarodnym delam. M. – 2013. – s.29 i sl.

12. Titushkin V.Ju. K voprosu o vneshnih granicah kontinental’nogo shel’fa Rossijskoj Federacii v Arktike [To the question of the outer limits of the continental shelf of the Russian Federation in the Arctic] Mezhdunarodnoe morskoe pravo. Stat’i pamjati A.L.Kolodkina. M. – «Statut». – 2014. – s. 240.