To the 50th Anniversary of the European Patent Convention (1973–2023)

INTRODUCTION. This paper reflects historical overview of long-standing emergence of mechanisms of judicial protections of patent rights conferred by European patens which begun even in 1950-s and ended with start of operations of the Unified Patent Court in 2023. The paper demonstrates that the establishment of the similar mechanism within the Eurasian Patent Organization or Eurasian Economic Union may require different approaches because of possible centralization of industrial property protection under Eurasian Patent Organization.

METHODS AND MATERIALS. The research materials for this paper are scientific works of foreign and Russian scientists and officials of the European Patent Office and the Eurasian Patent Office, legal acts of international and regional levels and drafts thereof. Methodological basis of this research are general and special scientific methods.

RESEARCH RESULTS. This paper suggests periodization in emergence and evolution of dispute resolution mechanisms for European patents, reveals rationales for establishment of the unified patent judiciary in Europe and outlines directions for further research of prospects of creation of the similar mechanism in the Eurasian region. Some findings made in this article may facilitate the growth of such researches.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS. European Union (EU) accumulated broad experience in establishment of the dispute resolution mechanisms for European patents. Due to uniqueness the Unified Patent Court is of great interest when researching prospect of improvements of the patent judiciary and quasi-judicial mechanisms under the Eurasian Patent Convention. However, trends of developments of the Eurasian Patent Organization and possible centralization of the regional protection of industrial property may testify that a Eurasian analogue of the Unified Patent Court would have a different institutional form.

1. Abdullin A.I. Mehanizm vzaimodejstvija Suda ES i nacional’nyh sudov gosudarstv-chlenov v sfere pravovoj ohrany intellektual’noj sobstvennosti [Mechanism of interaction of the Court of EU and national courts of member states in the field of intellectual property protection]. – Vestnik Jekonomiki, Prava i Sociologii [Herald of Economy, Law and Sociology]. 2012. No. 2. P. 97-101. (In Russ.)

2. Baldan F. Judicial Coherence in the European Patent System. Lessons from the US and Japan. Cheltenham, UK. Edward Elgar. 2022. 304 p.

3. Cremers K., Ernicke M., Gaessler F., Harhoff D., Helmers C., McDonagh L., Schliessler P., van Zeebroeck N. Patent litigation in Europe. – European Journal of Law and Economics. 2017 Vol. 44. P. 1-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-016-9529-0.

4. De Lange D. EU patent harmonization policy: reconsidering the consequences of the UPCA. – Journal of Intellectual Property & Practice. 2021. Vol. 16. No. 10. P. 1078-1090. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpab096.

5. England P. The scope of protection of patent claims in Europe and the UPC. – Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. 2016. Vol. 11. Issue 9. P. 689-697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpw116.

6. Eremenko V.I. Vozmozhnye puti razvitija Evrazijskoj patentnoj sistemy [Possible ways of developments of the Eurasian patent system]. – Izobretatel’stvo [Inventiveness]. 2011. No. 5. P. 7-14. (In Russ)

7. Fallah S.M., Koller A., Stadler M. The UPCA’s Path to Entry into Force between Delayed and Withdrawn Ratifications – Dead-end Street or Bumps in the Road? – Journal of European and International IP Law. 2021. Vol. 70. Issue 7. P. 662–666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikab007.

8. Froschmaier F. Some Aspect of the Draft Convention Relating to a European Patent Law. – International & Comparative Law Quarterly. 1963. Vol. 12. No. 3. P. 896.

9. Graf von Luckner J. The End of Satellite Treaty Law as We Know It? The German Federal Constitution Court, European Integration by International Law and Treaties “Supplementing or Being Otherwise Closely Tied to the EU”. – German Law Journal. 2022. No. 23. P. 157-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2022.14.

10. Grigor’ev A.N., Eremenko V.I. Evrazijskoe Patentnoe Pravo: Kommentarij i normativnye pravovye akty [Eurasian Patent Law: Comments and Legal Acts]. Moscow, OAO INIC «PATENT». 2012. 520 p. (In Russ)

11. Grigor’ev A.N. Evrazijskaja patentnaja sistema – instrument jekonomicheskoj integracii na postsovetskom prostranstve [Eurasian patent system – an instrument of economic integration in the post-Soviet area]. – Jekonomicheskie strategii [Economic strategies]. 2007. No. 3. P. 6-13. (In Russ.)

12. Ivliev G.P. Srednesrochnye i dolgosrochnye zadachi prava v sfere intellektual’noj sobstvennosti v Evrazijskom regione [Mid-term and long-term challenges of law in the field of intellectual property in Eurasian region]. – Zhurnal rossijskogo prava [Journal of Russian law]. 2024. No. 1. Р. 18-24. (In Russ.)

13. Ivliev G.P. Transformacija sfery intellektual'noj sobstvennosti v sovremennyh uslovijah [Transformation of field of intellectual property in modern conditions]. – Moscow. Gorodets. 2020. 336 p. (In Russ.)

14. Khuchua T. Different ‘Rules of the Games’ – Impact of National Court Systems on Patent Litigation in the EU and the Need for New Perspectives. – Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law. 2019. Vol. 10. No. 2.

15. Kranakis E. Patents and Power: European Patent-System Integration in the Context of Globalization. – Technology and Culture. 2007. Vol. 48. No. 4. P. 689-728.

16. Kur A., Dreier T. European Intellectual Property Law. Text, cases and materials. Cheltenham, UK. Edward Elgar. 592 p.

17. Nicolai T.R. The European Patent Convention: A Theoretical and Practical Look at International Legislation. – The International Lawyer. 1971. No. 5. P. 135-164.

18. Pila J. European Patent: An Old and Vexing Problem. – International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2013, Vol. 62. No. 4. P. 917-940. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589313000304.

19. Plomer A. A Unitary Patent for A (Dis)United Europe: The Long Shadow of History. – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. Vol. 46. 2015. P. 517-533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-015-0356-6.

20. Thompson D. The Draft Convention for a European patent. – International & Comparative Law Quarterly. 1973. Vol. 22. No. 1. P. 51-82.

21. Vede Iu. V. Torpedoklage as kind of abuse of the procedural rights. – European Journal of Law and Political Sciences. 2020. No. 1. P. 23-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29013/EJLPS-20-1-23-26.

22. Visser D. Visser’s Annotated European Patent Convention. Kluwer. 2019. 976 p.

23. Wszolek A. Still Unifying? The Future of the Unified Patent Court. – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 2021. No. 52. P. 1145-1146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-021-01123-0.