“Environmental Dimension” of Article 234 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and Russian Legislation on the Regulation of Navigation in the Waters of the Northern Sea Route

INTRODUCTION. Climate change in the Arctic, caused by global warming, as well as the political processes taking place in the world associated with increased pressure from the countries of the collective West on the Russian Federation, again raise in Western doctrine the question of the validity of the Russian Federation establishing a national regime for navigation in the waters of the Northern Sea Route in accordance with Article 234 of the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. Doubts have been raised about our country’s compliance with the Convention’s requirement to maintain a balance between freedom of navigation and environmental protection. The purpose of this work is to analyze the validity of claims against the Russian Federation regarding its alleged abuse of the right to establish a national regime for navigation in the Arctic under the guise of environmental protection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. The problems raised in the work are structurally divided into three main groups. The first of them is related to the analysis of the characteristics of shipping in the Arctic under conditions of a changing climate, as well as the determination of the need to establish a special legal regime for navigation in polar waters. The second is devoted to the systematic interpretation of Article 234 of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, in its relationship with other norms of the Convention, identifying the criteria and restrictions established therein in relation to the rules of navigation adopted by the coastal state in ice-covered areas, as well as the legal content of the requirement of “due attention to navigation and protection and conservation of the marine environment.” The third part of the work is devoted to assessing the legislation of the Russian Federation on the regulation of navigation along the Northern Sea Route for its compliance with the requirements of Article 234 and maintaining the balance of freedom of navigation and protection of the marine environment in the Arctic.

RESEARCH RESULTS. The legislation of the Russian Federation on the regulation of navigation in the waters of the Northern Sea Route fully meets the conditions and criteria established by Article 234 of the Convention, and is aimed at ensuring the functioning of a unified and centralized system for managing the safety of navigation in the particularly dangerous conditions of the Arctic, preventing accidents and environmental pollution environment. The restrictions established by Russian legislation are not discriminatory and are based on current and constantly updated scientific data.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS. Shipping in polar waters involves enormous risks to human life, valuable property and an extremely fragile and vulnerable environment. The effects of global warming are only exacerbating these risks, leading to increased ice instability and worsening climate problems. In this regard, in ice-covered areas, a centralized navigation management system is objectively necessary, and the establishment of special, uniform legal regulation to ensure the uninterrupted functioning of such a system. A systematic interpretation of Article 234 of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea allows us to conclude that the establishment by a coastal state within its EEZ of non-discriminatory laws and regulations aimed at preventing, reducing and keeping under control pollution of the marine environment from ships is not a privilege, but a duty of the state based on its more general obligation to protect the marine environment, established in articles 192 and 194 of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. The rule of “due respect to navigation” in this regard should be interpreted to mean that the restrictions and requirements imposed by the laws and regulations of the coastal State must be primarily aimed at ensuring the safety and protection of the marine environment in harsh climatic conditions, without being at the same time discriminatory, unreasonable and excessive.

1. Ezhova T.G. Principy osushchestvleniya mezhdunarodnoj zashchity morskoj sredy Baltijskogo morya [Principles for the implementation of international protection of the marine environment of the Baltic Sea]. – Vestnik Baltijskogo federal’nogo universiteta im. I. Kanta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye i obshche-stvennye nauki. 2014. No. 3. P. 147-155. (In Russ.).

2. Gavrilov V.V. Pravovoi status Severnogo morskogo puti Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Legal status of the Northern Sea Route of the Russian Federation]. – Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2015. No. 2. P. 147-157. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/7635.

3. Gavrilov V.V., Dremliuga R.I., Kripakoova A.V. Tolkovanie i primenenie stat’i 234 Konvencii OON po morskomu pravu 1982 g. v usloviyah sokrashcheniya ledovogo pokrova Arktiki [Interpretation and Application of Article 234 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 1982 in Light of the Shrinking Ice Cover in the Arctic]. – Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2017. No. 12. P. 151-160. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/article_5a20050801d1a2.96251387.

4. Gavrilov V., Dremliuga R., Nurimbetov R. Article 234 of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the law of the sea and reduction of ice cover in the Arctic Ocean. – Marine Policy. 2019. Vol. 106, 103518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103518.

5. Mednikov V., Hantington G.P. Arkticheskoe sudohodstvo: nadlezhashchee upravlenie, osnovannoe na faktah, a ne na mifah [Arctic Shipping: Good Governance Based on Facts, Not Myths]. – Morskie vesti Rossii. 2016. No. 10. (In Russ.). URL: https://morvesti.ru/themes/1698/62546/.

6. Nersesov B.A., Rimskij-Korsakov N.A. Rezul’taty ekologicheskih issledovanij rossijskih arkticheskih morej [Results of environmental studies of Russian Arctic seas]. – Rossijskaya Arktika. 2021. No. 13. P. 14-25. (In Russ.).

7. Rossi C.R. The Northern Sea Route and the Seaward Extension of Uti Possidetis (Juris). – Nordic Journal of International Law. 2014. Vol. 83. Issue 4. P. 476-508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718107-08304004.

8. Solski J.J. The ‘Due Regard’ of Article 234 of UNCLOS: Lessons from Regulating Innocent Passage in the Territorial Sea. – Ocean Development & International Law. 2021. Vol. 52. Issue 4. P. 398-418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2021.1991866.

9. Solski J.J. The Northern sea route at the crossroads: what lies ahead after the war in Ukraine? – The Polar Journal. 2022. Vol. 12. No. 2. P. 401-403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2022.2133389.

10. Statuto A.I. Obzor roli Arkticheskogo sudohodstva i obespe-chenie ego ekologicheskoj bezopasnosti [Overview of the Arctic Shipping Role and Ensuring of its Envirnmental]. – Rossijskaya Arktika. 2020. No. 9. P. 5-16. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/2658-4255-2020-12091.

11. Sun Shiya, Ma Linxing. Restrictions on the Use of Force at Sea: An Environmental Protection Perspective. – International Review of the Red Cross. 2016. Vol. 98. № 902. P. 515-541.

12. Tretij ocenochnyj doklad ob izmeneniyah klimata i ih posledstviyah na territorii Rossijskoj Federacii. Obshchee rezyume [Third assessment report on climate change and its consequences on the territory of the Russian Federation. General summary]. Saint Petersburg. High technology Publ. 2022. 124 p. (In Russ.).

13. Virzo R. Coastal State Competences Regarding Safety of Maritime Navigation: recent trends. – Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos. 2015. Vol. 36. No. 71. P. 19-42. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2015v36n71p19.

14. Vylegzhanin A.N., Nazarov V.P., Bunin I.V. Severniy morskoy put’: k resheniyu politico-pravovyh problem [The Northern Sea Route: towards solving political and Legal problems]. – Vestnik RAN. 2020. T. 90. No. 12. P. 1105-1118. DOI: 10.31857/S0869587320120270.