ON THE LEGITIMACY OF THE USE OF MILITARY FORCE BY FOREIGN STATES (THE SYRIAN CASE)

INTRODUCTION. Military interventions in Syria by the US and its allies confirm a tendency in the policy of Western countries to ignore international law and to act in accordance with the “rule of force”, without the sanction of the UN Security Council. Russia, as a state that respects its sovereignty and international law, does not accept this approach. Russia stands for diplomatic dialogue at all venues in order to stop destabilization in international relations, including the confrontation in Syria, and to find proper legal solutions. The article recommends specific options for such solutions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. The study relies on such legal sources as the UN Charter, generally recognized principles of international law, UN Security Council resolutions, the Joint Statement of the Presidents of Russia and the United States on Syria of November 11, 2017, the joint press conference of the Presidents of Russia and the United States in Helsinki on July 17, 2018 as well as scientific studies of Russian and foreign researches. The research involved general scientific and comparative legal and historical methods of study.

RESEARCH RESULTS. The author concludes that the United States and its allies using military force in Syria act in violation of the UN Charter. Russia, on the contrary, uses its military contingent in Syria in full accordance with the provisions of the UN Charter on the collective self-defense, at the request of the legitimate government of Syria.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS. The author makes a concrete proposal for the search of a peaceful settlement in Syria on the basis of the Joint Statement, which was approved by the Presidents of Russia and the United States in November 11, 2017 following their meeting on the margins of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit meeting in Danang, Vietnam. The author advocates that Russian and American experts jointly reconsider main elements of this document and provide an up-dated version with due account of new realities, and submit it to the UN Security Council for the adoption of a consensus resolution that would lay down the international legal framework for a peaceful settlement in Syria.

1. Aleshin V.V., Kalamkaryan R.A., Kulebyakin V.N. Retsenziya na knigu: Farkhutdinov I.Z. Amerikanskaya doktrina o preventivnom voennom udare ot Monro do Trampa: mezhdunarodno-pravovye aspekty. M., 2017. 338 s. [Review of the Book: Farkhutdinov I.Z. American Doctrine of Preventive Strikes from Monroe to Trump: International Legal Aspects. Moscow. 2017. 338 p.]. – Moscow Journal of International Law. 2017. No. 4. P. 151–155. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.24833/0869-0049-2017-4-151-155

2. Almond H.H. Space without Weapons. – Proceedings of the Symposium held on October 25–27, 1989. Ed. by N.M. Matte. Montreal: McGill University. 1989. P. 109–136.

3. Coady C.A.J. The Ethics of Armed Humanitarian Intervention. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace. 2002. 47 p.

4. Evans M.D. International Law. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2014. 873 p.

5. Khlestov O.N., Medvedeva D.O. Vooruzhennye konflikty i pravo na samooboronu [Armed Conflicts and the Right for Self-defense]. – Moscow Journal of International Law. 2005. No. 2 (58). P. 62–76. (In Russ.)

6. Kostenko N.I. Pravo mezhdunarodnoi bezopasnosti (teoreticheskie osnovy stanovleniya i razvitiya): Monografiya [The Law of International Security (theoretical foundations of its development and progress): A Monograph]. Moscow: Yurlitinform Publ. 2018. 408 p. (In Russ.)

7. Kwarteng A.H. Introduction to International Law. Saarbrücken: Lap Lambert Academic Publishing. 2015. 57 p.

8. O’Connell M.N. War and Peace. – Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law. Ed. by B. Fassbender, A. Peters. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2013. P. 272–294.

9. Rivlin G. First Steps in the Law. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2015. 389 p.

10. Sayamov Yu. Ob aktual'nykh vneshnepoliticheskikh izmeneniyakh na mirovoi arene [On Actual Foreign Policy Changes on the World Arena]. – Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn'. 2018. No. 7. P. 44–56. (In Russ.)

11. Shaw M.N. International Law. 7th ed. Oxford: Cambridge University Press. 2014. 981 p.

12. Sovremennye problemy kosmicheskogo prava: Sbornik statei. Vstup. stat'ya Ye.A. Korovina, G.P. Zhukova [Modern Problems of Outer Space Law. A Collection of Articles. Introductory article by Ye.A. Korovin, G.P. Zhukov]. Moscow: Izd-vo inostrannoi literatury Publ. 1963. 400 p. (In Russ.)

13. Vitzthum V.G. [et al.]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo [International Law]. Moscow: Infotropik Media Publ. 2015. 1072 p. (In Russ.)

14. Vylegzhanin A.N., Potier T. Shaw’s Interpretation of International Law: Theoretical Reflections. – Moscow Journal of International Law. 2017. No. 4. P. 7–18. DOI: 10.24833/0869-0049-2017-4-7-18

15. Walzer M. The Argument about Humanitarian Intervention. – Dissent. 2002. Winter. P. 29–37.