Legal Regulation of the External Dimension of the Common European Asylum System: current state and future perspectives

INTRODUCTION. The article provides a thorough analysis of the external dimension of the European Union’s (EU) migration and asylum policy and its main components. The primary object of the research is the external area of the EU’s activities in the field of forced migration. The aim of the article is to define political and legal contours of the external dimension of the Common European Asylum System (CEAS), trace its development from 2015 to 2022, and determine future directions of its evolvement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. The aforementioned objectives are achieved through deployment of the following methodological designs: descriptive, exploratory, historical and case study. The article gives a detailed overview of the programming documents of the EU, acts of the EU law concerning forced migration, and their implementation in the context of global and regional instabilities.

RESEARCH RESULTS. Forced migration as an object of legal and political regulation on the part of the EU is subjected to “externalization” due to inconsistent internal practices and overall deviation of the EU members from the fundamental and internationally recognized burden-sharing principle in the field of refugee law. Such an approach should be perceived as an additional reason for potential deterioration of the migration situation in Europe, not to mention other possible implications on the human rights and economic dimensions.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS. The results of the analysis allow to draw significant conclusions: the external dimension of the CEAS became a top priority for the EU predominantly due to the inability of the European actors to reach consensus on the internal elements of the system; the external dimension of the CEAS may be characterized as a complex system consisting of political, legal and quasi-legal acts governing the EU’s external actions in the field of forced migration; the EU’s support became dependent on the willingness of its external partners to cooperate on migration-related issues; several external actors gained more bargaining power; external partnerships need to be readjusted in order to be efficient under current geopolitical circumstances.

1. Bisson L. S. Vneshnee izmerenie migratsionnoi politiki ES: instrumenty i vygody [External dimension of the EU migration policy: tools and profits]. – Nauchno-analiticheskii vestnik Instituta Evropy RAN. 2018. No. 5. P. 21-28. (In Russ.). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/vestnikier-an520182126

2. Castillejo Cl. The EU Migration Partnership Framework: time for a rethink?. – Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik Discussion Paper. 2017. No. 28/2017. 47 p. URL: https://www.idos-research.de/uploads/media/DP_28.2017.pdf (accessed 01.02.2022)

3. Collett E., Ahad A.EU Migration Partnerships: A work in progress. 2017. 55 p. URL: https://www.migrationpolicy.org/sites/default/files/publications/TCM-EUMigration-Partnerships-FINAL.pdf (accessed 01.02.2022)

4. Gukepshev A.A. Pravovoe regulirovanie vneshnego izmereniya politiki Evropeiskogo soyuza v sfere vynuzhdennoi migratsii [The legal regulation of the external dimension of the policy of the European Union in the forced migration sphere]. – Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. 2022. No. 3. P. 2-5. DOI:10.18572/1812-3910-2022-3-2-5

5. Ilke A [et al.]. West African interests in (EU) migration policy. Balancing domestic priorities with external incentives. – Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 2020. Vol. 46. Issue 15. P. 3101-3118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1750354

6. Ivanov D.V., Iordanovski S. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye aspekty obshcheevropeiskoi sistemy ubezhishcha: praktika primeneniya Dublinskoi konventsii, opredelyayushchei gosudarstvo, otvetstvennoe za rassmotrenie khodataistv o predostavlenii ubezhishcha, podannykh v odnom iz gosudarstv-chlenov Evropeiskogo Soyuza [International legal aspects of the pan-European asylum system: the practice of applying the Dublin Convention, which determines the state responsible for considering applications for asylum filed in one of the member states of the European Union]. –25 let vneshnei politike Rossii: sbornik materialov X Konventa RAMI (Moskva, 8-9 dekabrya 2016 g.): v 5 t. T. 4: Rossiya I sovremennyi mir: ekonomika i pravo. Ch. 2. Pod obshch. red. A.V.Malgina [25 years of Russia's foreign policy: collection of materials of the X RAMI Convention (Moscow, December 8-9, 2016): in 5 vols. Vol. 4: Russia and the modern world: economics and law. Part 2. Ed. by A.V. Malgin]. Moscow: MGIMO-Universitet Publ. 2017.P. 207-228. (In Russ.)

7. Le Coz C. EU Strategy on Voluntary Return and Reintegration. Crafting a Road Map to Better Cooperation with Migrant’s Countries of Origin. 2021. 27 p. URL: https://www.migrationpolicy.org/sites/default/files/publications/mpi_eu-strategy-voluntary-return-reintegration_final.pdf (accessed 01.02.2022)

8. Léonard S., Kaunert Chr.De-centring the Securitisation of Asylum and Migration in the European Union: Securitisation, Vulnerability and the Role of Turkey. – Geopolitics. 2022. Vol. 27. Issue 3. P. 729-751. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2021.1929183

9. Moreno-Lax V. EU external migration policy and the protection of human rights. 2020. 60 p. DOI: doi/10.2861/07288. URL: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/aa8378f7-0e99-11eb-bc07-01aa75e-d71a1/language-en (accessed 01.02.2022)

10. Peers St. EU Pact on Migration and Asylum. Implementation, Impact and Consequences in the Euro-Mediterranean Context. 2021. 20 p. URL: https://www.iemed.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/EU-Pact-Migration-Asy-lum-Implementation-Euro-Mediterranean_MedYear-book2021.pdf (accessed 01.02.2022)

11. Potemkina O.Yu. "Novoe partnerstvo" Komissii ES - "ambitsioznyi plan" s neyasnymi perspektivami ["New partnership" of the EU Commission - "ambitious plan" with unclear prospects]. – Evropeiskaya analitika 2017. Otv. red. K.N.Guseva [European Analytics 2017. Ed. by K.N. Gusev]. Moscow: IE RAN Publ. 2017. P. 71-80. (In Russ.)

12. Potemkina O.Yu. Mnogourovnevoe upravlenie migratsiei v Evropeiskom soyuze [Multilevel governance of the EU migration policy]. – Sovremennaya Evropa. 2020. No. 2. P. 100-110. (In Russ.). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/soveurope22020100110

13. Rybakov A.V. Pakt o migratsii i ubezhishche kak osnova formirovaniya novoi migratsionnoi politiki Evropeiskogo soyuza [The Pact on Migration and Asylum as the basis for the formation of a new migration policy of the European Union]. – Pravo i politika. 2021. No. 10. P. 70-82. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2021.10.36576

14. Tagaliapietra A. The European Migration Crisis: A Pendulum between the Internal and External Dimensions. 2019. 23 p. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/resrep19673.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3A496c1c7059a4a30ab33d9bc4a266de95 (accessed 01.02.2022)

15. Tardis M. European Union Partnerships with African Countries on Migration. A Common Issue with Conflicting Interests. – Notes de l’IFRI. 2018. 30 p. URL: https://www.ifri.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/tardis_eu_partnerships_african_countries_migration_2018.pdf (accessed 01.02.2022).

16. Tineke S. Human rights impact of the “external dimension” of European Union asylum and migration policy: out of sight, out of rights? Report. Committee on Migration, Refugees and Displaced Persons. Parliamentary Assembly. 2018. URL: https://pace.coe.int/files/24808/pdf (accessed 01.02.2022).

17. Torondel L.M. The European Union instruments for the externalization of irregular migration management since 2016. – IEEE Opinion Paper. 2021. No. 115/2021. 10 p. URL: https://www.ieee.es/Galerias/fichero/docs_opinion/2021/DIEEEO115_2021_MARTOR_Instrumentos_ENG.pdf (accessed 01.02.2022)

18. Zvereva T., Karpovich O. Obshchaya migratsionnaya politika ES: novyi start?. – Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn'. 2021. No.7. P. 94-103. (In Russ.)