Contribution of the International Court of justice to the Development of International Economic Law
https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2016-3-31-48
Abstract
The paper is focused on the practice of settlement by the UN International Court of Justice of disputes concerning the international economic law. It exposes criteria of application of diplomatic protection, nationalization with just and real compensation in accordance with the applicable rules of international law. It also specifies such principles of International Law as independence of States in international economic relations; inherence of rights of a State on natural resources within the State’s territory; the national treatment regime and the most favored nation clause applied on non-discriminatory basis.
Keywords
международное экономическое право,
разрешение споров,
дипломатическая защита,
режим наиболее благоприятствуемой нации,
национальный режим,
практика Международного Суда ООН,
International economic law,
dispute settlement,
diplomatic protection,
the most favored nation treatment,
the national regime,
practice of the UN International Court of Justice
About the Authors
Alexander N. Vylegzhanin
MGIMO-University MFA Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ksenia E. Alferyeva
MGIMO-University MFA Russia; Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Полянский Н.Н. Международный суд. Отв. ред. член-корреспондент АН СССР Е.А. Коровин. М. Издательство АН СССР. 1951 г.
2. Крылов С.Б. Международный Суд Организации Объединенных Наций. М. 1958 г.
3. Кожевников Ф.И., Шармазанашвили Г.В. Международный Суд ООН: организация, цели, практика. М. 1971.
4. И.П. Блищенко, Ж. Дориа. Прецеденты в международном публичном и частном праве. - М.: 1999. 472 с.
5. Международное морское право. Статьи памяти А.Л. Колодкина. - М.: Статут. 2013. С.40-60.
6. Вылегжанин А.Н. Решения Международного Суда ООН по спорам о разграничении морских пространств. -М.: Юридическая литература. 2004. 222 с.
7. Шинкарецкая Г.Г. Роль Международного Суда ООН в развитии международного морского права. URL: http://www.sea-law.ru/index.php?id=274&Itemid=76&option=com_content&task=view.
8. Вклад Международного Суда в международное гуманитарное право // Международный журнал Красного Креста. Сборник статей. 2003. С. 89-128.
9. Вылегжанин А.Н., Лабин Д.К., Шумилов В.М. и др. Международное экономическое право. -М.: МГИМО МИД России. 2012. С. 18.
10. John H. Jackson, William J. Davey, Alan O. Sykes, Jr. Legal Problems of International Economic Relations: Cases, Materials and Text on the National and International Regulation of Transnational Economic Relations. Third Ed. West Group. St. Paul, Minn., 1995. 1248 p.
11. Официальный сайт Международного Суда ООН - http://www.icj-cij.org/jurisdiction/index.php?p1=5&p2=1&p3=3.
12. International Court of Justice, Anglo-Iranian Oil Co. Case, United Kingdom v. Iran, Preliminary Objection, July 22nd, 1952.
13. International Court of Justice, Nottebohm Case, Liechtenstein v. Guatemala, Judgment of April 6th, 1955.
14. International Court of Justice, Case of Certain Norwegian Loans, France v. Norway, Judgment of July 6th, 1957.
15. International Court of Justice, Case concerning Elettronica Sicula S.P.A. (ELSI), United States of America v. Italy, Judgment of July 20th, 1989.
16. International Court of Justice, Case Concerning Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru, Nauru v. Australia, Judgment of June 26th, 1992.
17. International Court of Justice, Case concerning certain property, Liechtenstein v. Germany, Judgment of February 10th, 2005
18. International Court of Justice, Anglo-Iranian Oil Co. Case, United Kingdom v. Iran, Preliminary Objection, July 22nd, 1952.
19. I.C.J. Reports, Nottebohm Case, Liechtenstein v. Guatemala, Judgment of April 6th, 1955. P. 20-21, 25-26.
20. “Nationality is a legal bond having as its basis a social fact of attachment, a genuine connection of existence, interests and sentiments, together with the existence of reciprocal rights and duties”. International Court of Justice, Nottebohm Case, Judgment of April 6th, 1955. P. 23.
21. R. McCorcodale, M. Dixon. Cases & Materials on International Law. Oxford University Press. Fourth Edition. 2003. P. 492-520.
22. I.C.J. Reports, Case of Certain Norwegian Loans, Judgment of July 6th, 1957. P. 6, 9, 23-24, 27.
23. French Declaration accepting the compulsory jurisdiction of the Court, International Court of Justice, Case of Certain Norwegian Loans, Judgment of July 6th, 1957. P. 21.
24. «Договаривающиеся державы согласились не прибегать к вооруженной силе для истребования договорных долгов, взыскиваемых правительством одной страны с правительства другой страны, как причитающихся ее подданным». http://docs.pravo.ru/document/view/20754067/19827671/ (дата обращения - 24.01.2015)
25. International Court of Justice, Case concerning the Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited, Second Phase, Judgment of February 5th 1970. Para 25. P. 12.
26. International Court of Justice, Case concerning the Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited, Second Phase, Judgment of February 5th 1970. Para 3. Р. 7.
27. International Court of Justice, Case concerning the Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited, Second Phase, Judgment of February 5th 1970. Para 35. P. 33.
28. I.C.J .Reports, Case concerning the Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited, Second Phase, Judgment of February 5th 1970. P.48.
29. International Court of Justice. Case Concerning Elettronica Sicula S.P.A. (ELSI), United States of America v. Italy. Judgment of July 20th 1989.
30. I.C.J. Reports, Case Concerning Elettronica Sicula S.P.A. (ELSI), United States of America v. Italy. Judgment of July 20th 1989. P. 37.
31. I.C.J. Reports, International Court of Justice, Case concerning Elettronica Sicula S.P.A. (ELSI), Judgment of July 20th 1989. P. 51.
32. International Court of Justice, Case concerning Elettronica Sicula S.P.A. (ELSI), Judgment of July 20th 1989. Para 114. P. 57.
33. I.C.J. Reports, Case concerning Elettronica Sicula S.P.A. (ELSI), Judgment of July 20th 1989. Para 122. P. 62.
34. I.C.J. Reports, Case concerning Elettronica Sicula S.P.A. (ELSI), Judgment of July 20th 1989. Para 130. P. 66.
35. I.C.J. Reports, Case concerning Elettronica Sicula S.P.A. (ELSI), Judgment of July 20th 1989. Para 136. P. 70.
36. International Court of Justice, Case Concerning Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru, Nauru v. Australia, Judgment of June 26th 1992.
37. International Court of Justice, Case Concerning Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru, Judgment of June 26th 1992. P. 246-248, 250, 252, 255.
38. International Court of Justice. Case Concerning Certain Property. Judgment of February 10th 2005. P.10.
39. http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=INT;n=10380.
40. Convention on Settlement of the Matters Arising out the War and the Occupation, 1952 Article 3 of Chapter 61.
41. International Court of Justice. Case Concerning Certain Property. Judgment of February 10th 2005. P. 17-18.
42. International Court of Justice. Case Concerning Certain Property. Judgment of February 10th 2005. Para. 49. P. 25.
43. International Court of Justice. Case Concerning Certain Property. Judgment of February 10th 2005. Para. 53. P. 27.
Review
For citations:
Vylegzhanin A.N., Alferyeva K.E. Contribution of the International Court of justice to the Development of International Economic Law. Moscow Journal of International Law. 2016;(3):31-48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2016-3-31-48
Views:
2358
Email this article 