mgimolawМосковский журнал международного праваMoscow Journal of International Law0869-00492619-0893Moscow State Institute of International Relations10.24833/0869-0049-2016-3-31-48mgimolaw-153Research ArticleМЕЖДУНАРОДНОЕ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОЕ ПРАВОINTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAWВклад Международного Суда ООН в развитие международного экономического праваContribution of the International Court of justice to the Development of International Economic LawВылегжанинАлександр НиколаевичVylegzhaninAlexander N.Vylegjanin@mgimo.ru.АлферьеваКсения Е.AlferyevaKsenia E.xeni-mgimo@yandex.ru.МГИМО МИД РоссииРоссияMGIMO-University MFA RussiaRussian FederationМГИМО МИД России; МИД РоссииРоссияMGIMO-University MFA Russia; Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian FederationRussian Federation201630092016033148Copyright © Вылегжанин А.Н., Алферьева К.Е., 20162016Вылегжанин А.Н., Алферьева К.Е.Vylegzhanin A.N., Alferyeva K.E.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.mjil.ru/jour/article/view/153

В статье рассматриваются избранные решения Международного Суда ООН по спорам, касающимся международного экономического права. Выявляются обозначенные Судом условия осуществления государством дипломатической защиты своих лиц; критерии национализации, проводимой в соответствии с применимыми нормами международного права; показан вклад Суда в уточнение содержания таких принципов, как независимость государств в международных экономических отношениях; неотъемлемость права государства на природные ресурсы в пределах его территории; предоставление национального режима и режима наиболее благоприятствуемой нации; значение вопросов международного экономического права для определения Судом наличия юрисдикции в отношении конкретного спора государств.

The paper is focused on the practice of settlement by the UN International Court of Justice of disputes concerning the international economic law. It exposes criteria of application of diplomatic protection, nationalization with just and real compensation in accordance with the applicable rules of international law. It also specifies such principles of International Law as independence of States in international economic relations; inherence of rights of a State on natural resources within the State’s territory; the national treatment regime and the most favored nation clause applied on non-discriminatory basis.

международное экономическое праворазрешение споровдипломатическая защитарежим наиболее благоприятствуемой нациинациональный режимпрактика Международного Суда ООНInternational economic lawdispute settlementdiplomatic protectionthe most favored nation treatmentthe national regimepractice of the UN International Court of JusticeReferencesПолянский Н.Н. Международный суд. Отв. ред. член-корреспондент АН СССР Е.А. Коровин. М. Издательство АН СССР. 1951 г.Полянский Н.Н. Международный суд. Отв. ред. член-корреспондент АН СССР Е.А. Коровин. М. Издательство АН СССР. 1951 г.Крылов С.Б. Международный Суд Организации Объединенных Наций. М. 1958 г.Крылов С.Б. Международный Суд Организации Объединенных Наций. М. 1958 г.Кожевников Ф.И., Шармазанашвили Г.В. Международный Суд ООН: организация, цели, практика. М. 1971.Кожевников Ф.И., Шармазанашвили Г.В. Международный Суд ООН: организация, цели, практика. М. 1971.И.П. Блищенко, Ж. Дориа. Прецеденты в международном публичном и частном праве. - М.: 1999. 472 с.И.П. Блищенко, Ж. Дориа. Прецеденты в международном публичном и частном праве. - М.: 1999. 472 с.Международное морское право. Статьи памяти А.Л. Колодкина. - М.: Статут. 2013. С.40-60.Международное морское право. Статьи памяти А.Л. Колодкина. - М.: Статут. 2013. С.40-60.Вылегжанин А.Н. Решения Международного Суда ООН по спорам о разграничении морских пространств. -М.: Юридическая литература. 2004. 222 с.Вылегжанин А.Н. Решения Международного Суда ООН по спорам о разграничении морских пространств. -М.: Юридическая литература. 2004. 222 с.Шинкарецкая Г.Г. Роль Международного Суда ООН в развитии международного морского права. URL: http://www.sea-law.ru/index.php?id=274&Itemid=76&option=com_content&task=view.Шинкарецкая Г.Г. Роль Международного Суда ООН в развитии международного морского права. URL: http://www.sea-law.ru/index.php?id=274&Itemid=76&option=com_content&task=view.Вклад Международного Суда в международное гуманитарное право // Международный журнал Красного Креста. Сборник статей. 2003. С. 89-128.Вклад Международного Суда в международное гуманитарное право // Международный журнал Красного Креста. Сборник статей. 2003. С. 89-128.Вылегжанин А.Н., Лабин Д.К., Шумилов В.М. и др. Международное экономическое право. -М.: МГИМО МИД России. 2012. С. 18.Вылегжанин А.Н., Лабин Д.К., Шумилов В.М. и др. Международное экономическое право. -М.: МГИМО МИД России. 2012. С. 18.John H. Jackson, William J. Davey, Alan O. Sykes, Jr. Legal Problems of International Economic Relations: Cases, Materials and Text on the National and International Regulation of Transnational Economic Relations. Third Ed. West Group. St. Paul, Minn., 1995. 1248 p.John H. Jackson, William J. Davey, Alan O. Sykes, Jr. Legal Problems of International Economic Relations: Cases, Materials and Text on the National and International Regulation of Transnational Economic Relations. Third Ed. West Group. St. Paul, Minn., 1995. 1248 p.Официальный сайт Международного Суда ООН - http://www.icj-cij.org/jurisdiction/index.php?p1=5&p2=1&p3=3.Официальный сайт Международного Суда ООН - http://www.icj-cij.org/jurisdiction/index.php?p1=5&p2=1&p3=3.International Court of Justice, Anglo-Iranian Oil Co. Case, United Kingdom v. Iran, Preliminary Objection, July 22nd, 1952.International Court of Justice, Anglo-Iranian Oil Co. Case, United Kingdom v. Iran, Preliminary Objection, July 22nd, 1952.International Court of Justice, Nottebohm Case, Liechtenstein v. Guatemala, Judgment of April 6th, 1955.International Court of Justice, Nottebohm Case, Liechtenstein v. Guatemala, Judgment of April 6th, 1955.International Court of Justice, Case of Certain Norwegian Loans, France v. Norway, Judgment of July 6th, 1957.International Court of Justice, Case of Certain Norwegian Loans, France v. Norway, Judgment of July 6th, 1957.International Court of Justice, Case concerning Elettronica Sicula S.P.A. (ELSI), United States of America v. Italy, Judgment of July 20th, 1989.International Court of Justice, Case concerning Elettronica Sicula S.P.A. (ELSI), United States of America v. Italy, Judgment of July 20th, 1989.International Court of Justice, Case Concerning Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru, Nauru v. Australia, Judgment of June 26th, 1992.International Court of Justice, Case Concerning Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru, Nauru v. Australia, Judgment of June 26th, 1992.International Court of Justice, Case concerning certain property, Liechtenstein v. Germany, Judgment of February 10th, 2005International Court of Justice, Case concerning certain property, Liechtenstein v. Germany, Judgment of February 10th, 2005International Court of Justice, Anglo-Iranian Oil Co. Case, United Kingdom v. Iran, Preliminary Objection, July 22nd, 1952.International Court of Justice, Anglo-Iranian Oil Co. Case, United Kingdom v. Iran, Preliminary Objection, July 22nd, 1952.I.C.J. Reports, Nottebohm Case, Liechtenstein v. Guatemala, Judgment of April 6th, 1955. P. 20-21, 25-26.I.C.J. Reports, Nottebohm Case, Liechtenstein v. Guatemala, Judgment of April 6th, 1955. P. 20-21, 25-26.“Nationality is a legal bond having as its basis a social fact of attachment, a genuine connection of existence, interests and sentiments, together with the existence of reciprocal rights and duties”. International Court of Justice, Nottebohm Case, Judgment of April 6th, 1955. P. 23.“Nationality is a legal bond having as its basis a social fact of attachment, a genuine connection of existence, interests and sentiments, together with the existence of reciprocal rights and duties”. International Court of Justice, Nottebohm Case, Judgment of April 6th, 1955. P. 23.R. McCorcodale, M. Dixon. Cases & Materials on International Law. Oxford University Press. Fourth Edition. 2003. P. 492-520.R. McCorcodale, M. Dixon. Cases & Materials on International Law. Oxford University Press. Fourth Edition. 2003. P. 492-520.I.C.J. Reports, Case of Certain Norwegian Loans, Judgment of July 6th, 1957. P. 6, 9, 23-24, 27.I.C.J. Reports, Case of Certain Norwegian Loans, Judgment of July 6th, 1957. P. 6, 9, 23-24, 27.French Declaration accepting the compulsory jurisdiction of the Court, International Court of Justice, Case of Certain Norwegian Loans, Judgment of July 6th, 1957. P. 21.French Declaration accepting the compulsory jurisdiction of the Court, International Court of Justice, Case of Certain Norwegian Loans, Judgment of July 6th, 1957. P. 21.«Договаривающиеся державы согласились не прибегать к вооруженной силе для истребования договорных долгов, взыскиваемых правительством одной страны с правительства другой страны, как причитающихся ее подданным». http://docs.pravo.ru/document/view/20754067/19827671/ (дата обращения - 24.01.2015)«Договаривающиеся державы согласились не прибегать к вооруженной силе для истребования договорных долгов, взыскиваемых правительством одной страны с правительства другой страны, как причитающихся ее подданным». http://docs.pravo.ru/document/view/20754067/19827671/ (дата обращения - 24.01.2015)International Court of Justice, Case concerning the Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited, Second Phase, Judgment of February 5th 1970. Para 25. P. 12.International Court of Justice, Case concerning the Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited, Second Phase, Judgment of February 5th 1970. Para 25. P. 12.International Court of Justice, Case concerning the Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited, Second Phase, Judgment of February 5th 1970. Para 3. Р. 7.International Court of Justice, Case concerning the Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited, Second Phase, Judgment of February 5th 1970. Para 3. Р. 7.International Court of Justice, Case concerning the Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited, Second Phase, Judgment of February 5th 1970. Para 35. P. 33.International Court of Justice, Case concerning the Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited, Second Phase, Judgment of February 5th 1970. Para 35. P. 33.I.C.J .Reports, Case concerning the Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited, Second Phase, Judgment of February 5th 1970. P.48.I.C.J .Reports, Case concerning the Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited, Second Phase, Judgment of February 5th 1970. P.48.International Court of Justice. Case Concerning Elettronica Sicula S.P.A. (ELSI), United States of America v. Italy. Judgment of July 20th 1989.International Court of Justice. Case Concerning Elettronica Sicula S.P.A. (ELSI), United States of America v. Italy. Judgment of July 20th 1989.I.C.J. Reports, Case Concerning Elettronica Sicula S.P.A. (ELSI), United States of America v. Italy. Judgment of July 20th 1989. P. 37.I.C.J. Reports, Case Concerning Elettronica Sicula S.P.A. (ELSI), United States of America v. Italy. Judgment of July 20th 1989. P. 37.I.C.J. Reports, International Court of Justice, Case concerning Elettronica Sicula S.P.A. (ELSI), Judgment of July 20th 1989. P. 51.I.C.J. Reports, International Court of Justice, Case concerning Elettronica Sicula S.P.A. (ELSI), Judgment of July 20th 1989. P. 51.International Court of Justice, Case concerning Elettronica Sicula S.P.A. (ELSI), Judgment of July 20th 1989. Para 114. P. 57.International Court of Justice, Case concerning Elettronica Sicula S.P.A. (ELSI), Judgment of July 20th 1989. Para 114. P. 57.I.C.J. Reports, Case concerning Elettronica Sicula S.P.A. (ELSI), Judgment of July 20th 1989. Para 122. P. 62.I.C.J. Reports, Case concerning Elettronica Sicula S.P.A. (ELSI), Judgment of July 20th 1989. Para 122. P. 62.I.C.J. Reports, Case concerning Elettronica Sicula S.P.A. (ELSI), Judgment of July 20th 1989. Para 130. P. 66.I.C.J. Reports, Case concerning Elettronica Sicula S.P.A. (ELSI), Judgment of July 20th 1989. Para 130. P. 66.I.C.J. Reports, Case concerning Elettronica Sicula S.P.A. (ELSI), Judgment of July 20th 1989. Para 136. P. 70.I.C.J. Reports, Case concerning Elettronica Sicula S.P.A. (ELSI), Judgment of July 20th 1989. Para 136. P. 70.International Court of Justice, Case Concerning Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru, Nauru v. Australia, Judgment of June 26th 1992.International Court of Justice, Case Concerning Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru, Nauru v. Australia, Judgment of June 26th 1992.International Court of Justice, Case Concerning Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru, Judgment of June 26th 1992. P. 246-248, 250, 252, 255.International Court of Justice, Case Concerning Certain Phosphate Lands in Nauru, Judgment of June 26th 1992. P. 246-248, 250, 252, 255.International Court of Justice. Case Concerning Certain Property. Judgment of February 10th 2005. P.10.International Court of Justice. Case Concerning Certain Property. Judgment of February 10th 2005. P.10.http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=INT;n=10380.http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc;base=INT;n=10380.Convention on Settlement of the Matters Arising out the War and the Occupation, 1952 Article 3 of Chapter 61.Convention on Settlement of the Matters Arising out the War and the Occupation, 1952 Article 3 of Chapter 61.International Court of Justice. Case Concerning Certain Property. Judgment of February 10th 2005. P. 17-18.International Court of Justice. Case Concerning Certain Property. Judgment of February 10th 2005. P. 17-18.International Court of Justice. Case Concerning Certain Property. Judgment of February 10th 2005. Para. 49. P. 25.International Court of Justice. Case Concerning Certain Property. Judgment of February 10th 2005. Para. 49. P. 25.International Court of Justice. Case Concerning Certain Property. Judgment of February 10th 2005. Para. 53. P. 27.International Court of Justice. Case Concerning Certain Property. Judgment of February 10th 2005. Para. 53. P. 27.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.