Ответственность за разглашение конфиденциальных сведений в международном уголовном праве


https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2016-2-188-203

Полный текст:


Аннотация

Одним из наиболее часто встречающихся преступлений против отправления международного уголовного правосудия в практике международных уголовных судов является разглашение конфиденциальных сведений, которые в национальных правопорядках отнесены к категориям тайны следствия и судебной тайны. Общественную опасность этого деяния сложно переоценить-предание огласке таких сведений способно расстроить расследования международных преступлений и подвергнуть опасности жизнь и здоровье ключевых свидетелей. В настоящей статье предлагается анализ элементов данного преступления.

Об авторе

Екатерина Алексеевна Копылова
МГИМО МИД России
Россия


Список литературы

1. S.T.L. Re Akhbar Beirut S.A.L. and Mr Ibrahim Mohamed Ali Al Amin, STL-14-06/I/CJ, Redacted Version of Decision in Proceedings for Contempt with Orders in lieu of an Indictment, 31 January 2014, para.54.

2. I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Marijačić and Rebić, IT-95-14-R77.2, Trial Chamber Judgment, 10 March 2006, para.50 (Marijačić Trial Judgment).

3. Procès Gbagbo: la bourde du témoin P547 et les soupçons du juge. URL: http://www.lemonde.fr/afrique/article/2016/02/04/proces-gbagbo-la-bourde-du-temoin-p547-et-les-soupcons-dujuge_4859285_3212.html#DOOqYKTA9cuvlKmx.99 (дата обращения - 4.02.2016).

4. I.C.C. Prosecutor v. Gbagbo and Blé Goudé, ICC-02/11-01/15-T-13-Red-ENG, 3 February 2016, p.25, lns.6-8.

5. I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Tadić, IT-94-1-A-AR77, Judgment on Allegations of Contempt against Prior Counsel, Milan Vujin, 31 January 2000, paras.13, 18/

6. I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Blaškić, IT-95-14-AR108bis, Judgment on the Request of The Republic of Croatia for Review of the Decision of Trial Chamber II of 18 July 1997, 29 October 1997, paras.25, 33, fn.27.

7. I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Tadić, IT-94-1-A, Judgment, 15 July 1999, paras.321-322.

8. I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Simić, et al., IT-95-9-PT, Separate Opinion of Judge David Hunt on Prosecutor’s Motion for a Ruling Concerning the Testimony of a Witness, 27 July 1999, para. 25.

9. S.T.L. Re Akhbar Beirut S. A. L. Ibrahim Mohamed Al Amin, STL-14-06/I/CJ/, Redacted Version of Decision in Proceedings for Contempt with Orders in Lieu of an Indictment, 31 January 2014, para. 10.

10. S.C.S.L. Independent Counsel v. Samura, SCSL-2005-01, Judgment in Contempt Proceedings, 26 October 2005, para. 14.

11. I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Tadić, Case No. IT-94-1-A-R77, Judgment on Allegations of Contempt Against Prior Counsel, Milan Vujin, 31 January 2000, para. 24.

12. I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Marijačić and Rebić, IT-95-14-R77.2, Trial Chamber Judgement, 10 March 2006, para. 15.

13. I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Aleksovski, IT-95-14/1-AR77, Judgment on appeal by Anto Nobilo against finding of contempt, 30 May 2001, para. 39.

14. I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Margetić, IT-95-14-R77.6, Sentencing judgement, 7 February 2007, para. 13.

15. S.C.S.L. Independent Counsel v. Brima, et al., SCSL-04-16-AR77, Decision on Defence Appeal Motion pursuant to Rule 77(J) on Both the Imposition of Interim Measures and an Order pursuant to Rule 77(C)(iii), 23 June 2005, para. 26.

16. S.C.S.L. Independent Counsel v. Samura, SCSL-2005-01, Judgment in Contempt Proceedings, 26 October 2005, para. 16.

17. S.T.L. Re Al Jadeed [Co.] S.A.L./New TV S.A.L. (N.T.V.), Karma Mohamed Thasin Al Khayat, STL-14-05/T/CJ, Public Redacted Version of Judgment, 18 September 2015, para. 34.

18. S.T.L. Re Al Jadeed [Co.] S.A.L./New TV S.A.L. (N.T.V.), Karma Mohamed Thasin Al Khayat, STL-14-05/PT/AP/AR126.1, Decision on Interlocutory Appeal Concerning Personal Jurisdiction in Contempt Proceedings, 2 October 2014, para. 32.

19. S.T.L. The Prosecutor v. Ayyash, et al., STL-11-01/PT/PTJ, Order for Immediate Removal of Disseminated Material and Cessation of Dissemination, 10 August 2012.

20. I.C.C. Prosecutor v. Bemba Gombo, et al., ICC-01/05-01/13-1093-Anx, Protocol on the Handling of Confi dential Information during Investigations and Contact between a Party and Witnesses of the other Parties, 20 July 2015.

21. I.C.C. Prosecutor v. Bemba Gombo, et al., ICC-01/05-01/13-T-10-Red-ENG, 29 September 2015, p.66, lns.14-24., p.72, ln.24 - p.73, ln.1.

22. I.C.C. Prosecutor v. Ruto and Sang, ICC-01/09-01/11-458-AnxA-Corr, Protocol Establishing a Redaction Regime in the Case of the Prosecutor v. Ruto and Sang, 5 October 2012.

23. I.C.C. Prosecutor v. Ntaganda, ICC-01/04-02/06-411-AnxA, Protocol Establishing a Redaction Regime in the Case of the Prosecutor v. Ntaganda, 12 December 2014.

24. I.C.C. Prosecutor v. Gbagbo, ICC-02/11-01/11-737-AnxA, Protocol Establishing a Redaction Regime in the Case of the Prosecutor v. Laurent Gbagbo, 15 December 2014.

25. Guidelines Governing the Relations between the Court and Intermediaries for the Organs and Units of the Court and Counsel working with intermediaries. March 2014. P. 6. URL: http://www.legal-tools.org/uploads/tx_ltpdb/GRCI-Eng_02.pdf (дата обращения - 7.03.2016).

26. I.C.T.Y. Re Florence Hartmann, IT-02-54-R77.5, Judgment on Allegations of Contempt, 14 September 2009, para.20 (Hartmann Trial Judgment).

27. Re Florence Hartmann, IT-02-54-R77.5-А, Judgment, 19 July 2011.

28. I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Blaškić, IT-95-14, Judgement, 3 March 2000, para.254 (Blaškić Judgment).

29. S.C.S.L. Prosecutor v. Brima, Kamara and Kanu, SCSL-04-16-T, Judgment, 20 June 2007, p.570-571 (Brima, et al. Judgment).

30. S.C.S.L. Prosecutor v. Brima, Kamara and Kanu, SCSL-04-16-T, Sentencing Judgment, 19 July 2007, p.36.

31. S.C.S.L. Prosecutor v. Bangura, Kargbo, Kanu, Kamara, SCSL-2011-02-T, Judgment in Contempt Proceedings, 25 September 2012.

32. I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Aleksovski, IT-95-14/1-AR77, Judgment on appeal by Anto Nobilo against fi nding of contempt, 30 May 2001, para.54 (Nobilo Judgment).

33. Eser A. Mental Element - Mistake of Fact and Mistake of Law // The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary / Ed. by A. Cassese, P. Gaeta, J. Jones. Vol.I. OUP Oxford, 2002. P. 931.

34. S.C.S.L. In The Matter of Contempt Proceedings Arising from the Case of The Prosecutor v. Taylor, SCSL-12-01-T, Judgment in Contempt Proceedings, 19 October 2012, para.39.

35. I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Blaškić, IT-95-14-A, Judgment, 29 July 2004, para.39.

36. Model Penal Code, § 2.02(c). URL: http://www.dubberkelman.com/restricted/student_cd/web/MPC/PART1/snippets/mental.htm (дата обращения - 13.03.2016).

37. Recklessness or Indirect Intent // Cassese’s International Criminal Law / 3rd ed. Oxford University Press, 2013. P. 46.


Дополнительные файлы

Для цитирования: Копылова Е.А. Ответственность за разглашение конфиденциальных сведений в международном уголовном праве. Московский журнал международного права. 2016;(2):188-203. https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2016-2-188-203

For citation: Kopylova E.A. Responsibility for Disclosing Information Constituting Judicial Secret in International Criminal Law. Moscow Journal of International Law. 2016;(2):188-203. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2016-2-188-203

Просмотров: 83

Обратные ссылки

  • Обратные ссылки не определены.


Creative Commons License
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0869-0049 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0893 (Online)