mgimolawМосковский журнал международного праваMoscow Journal of International Law0869-00492619-0893Moscow State Institute of International Relations10.24833/0869-0049-2016-2-188-203mgimolaw-148Research ArticleГОЛОСА МОЛОДЫХVOICES OF THE YOUNGОтветственность за разглашение конфиденциальных сведений в международном уголовном правеResponsibility for Disclosing Information Constituting Judicial Secret in International Criminal LawКопыловаЕкатерина АлексеевнаKopylovaEkaterina A.ilc48@mail.ruМГИМО МИД РоссииРоссияMGIMO-University MFA RussiaRussian Federation20163006201602188203Copyright © Копылова Е.А., 20162016Копылова Е.А.Kopylova E.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.mjil.ru/jour/article/view/148

Одним из наиболее часто встречающихся преступлений против отправления международного уголовного правосудия в практике международных уголовных судов является разглашение конфиденциальных сведений, которые в национальных правопорядках отнесены к категориям тайны следствия и судебной тайны. Общественную опасность этого деяния сложно переоценить-предание огласке таких сведений способно расстроить расследования международных преступлений и подвергнуть опасности жизнь и здоровье ключевых свидетелей. В настоящей статье предлагается анализ элементов данного преступления.

Disclosing confidential information, which in the national jurisdictions is referred to as secret of the investigations and judicial secret, is one of the most frequently committed offences against the administration of criminal justice. The danger of such conduct is self-explanatory. It is capable of undermining the investigations into international crimes and of putting in jeopardy life and well-being of the key witnesses. This article proposes an analysis of the elements of this offence.

разглашение судебной тайныразглашение тайны следствияпреступления против отправления международного правосудиямеждународное уголовное правомеждународное уголовное правосудиеМеждународный уголовный судМеждународный уголовный суд по бывшей ЮгославииDisclosing a judicial secretdisclosing a secret of the investigationsoffences against the administration of international justiceinternational criminal lawinternational criminal justiceRome StatuteInternational Criminal CourtInternational Criminal Tribunal for the Former YugoslaviaReferencesS.T.L. Re Akhbar Beirut S.A.L. and Mr Ibrahim Mohamed Ali Al Amin, STL-14-06/I/CJ, Redacted Version of Decision in Proceedings for Contempt with Orders in lieu of an Indictment, 31 January 2014, para.54.S.T.L. Re Akhbar Beirut S.A.L. and Mr Ibrahim Mohamed Ali Al Amin, STL-14-06/I/CJ, Redacted Version of Decision in Proceedings for Contempt with Orders in lieu of an Indictment, 31 January 2014, para.54.I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Marijačić and Rebić, IT-95-14-R77.2, Trial Chamber Judgment, 10 March 2006, para.50 (Marijačić Trial Judgment).I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Marijačić and Rebić, IT-95-14-R77.2, Trial Chamber Judgment, 10 March 2006, para.50 (Marijačić Trial Judgment).Procès Gbagbo: la bourde du témoin P547 et les soupçons du juge. URL: http://www.lemonde.fr/afrique/article/2016/02/04/proces-gbagbo-la-bourde-du-temoin-p547-et-les-soupcons-dujuge_4859285_3212.html#DOOqYKTA9cuvlKmx.99 (дата обращения - 4.02.2016).Procès Gbagbo: la bourde du témoin P547 et les soupçons du juge. URL: http://www.lemonde.fr/afrique/article/2016/02/04/proces-gbagbo-la-bourde-du-temoin-p547-et-les-soupcons-dujuge_4859285_3212.html#DOOqYKTA9cuvlKmx.99 (дата обращения - 4.02.2016).I.C.C. Prosecutor v. Gbagbo and Blé Goudé, ICC-02/11-01/15-T-13-Red-ENG, 3 February 2016, p.25, lns.6-8.I.C.C. Prosecutor v. Gbagbo and Blé Goudé, ICC-02/11-01/15-T-13-Red-ENG, 3 February 2016, p.25, lns.6-8.I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Tadić, IT-94-1-A-AR77, Judgment on Allegations of Contempt against Prior Counsel, Milan Vujin, 31 January 2000, paras.13, 18/I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Tadić, IT-94-1-A-AR77, Judgment on Allegations of Contempt against Prior Counsel, Milan Vujin, 31 January 2000, paras.13, 18/I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Blaškić, IT-95-14-AR108bis, Judgment on the Request of The Republic of Croatia for Review of the Decision of Trial Chamber II of 18 July 1997, 29 October 1997, paras.25, 33, fn.27.I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Blaškić, IT-95-14-AR108bis, Judgment on the Request of The Republic of Croatia for Review of the Decision of Trial Chamber II of 18 July 1997, 29 October 1997, paras.25, 33, fn.27.I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Tadić, IT-94-1-A, Judgment, 15 July 1999, paras.321-322.I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Tadić, IT-94-1-A, Judgment, 15 July 1999, paras.321-322.I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Simić, et al., IT-95-9-PT, Separate Opinion of Judge David Hunt on Prosecutor’s Motion for a Ruling Concerning the Testimony of a Witness, 27 July 1999, para. 25.I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Simić, et al., IT-95-9-PT, Separate Opinion of Judge David Hunt on Prosecutor’s Motion for a Ruling Concerning the Testimony of a Witness, 27 July 1999, para. 25.S.T.L. Re Akhbar Beirut S. A. L. Ibrahim Mohamed Al Amin, STL-14-06/I/CJ/, Redacted Version of Decision in Proceedings for Contempt with Orders in Lieu of an Indictment, 31 January 2014, para. 10.S.T.L. Re Akhbar Beirut S. A. L. Ibrahim Mohamed Al Amin, STL-14-06/I/CJ/, Redacted Version of Decision in Proceedings for Contempt with Orders in Lieu of an Indictment, 31 January 2014, para. 10.S.C.S.L. Independent Counsel v. Samura, SCSL-2005-01, Judgment in Contempt Proceedings, 26 October 2005, para. 14.S.C.S.L. Independent Counsel v. Samura, SCSL-2005-01, Judgment in Contempt Proceedings, 26 October 2005, para. 14.I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Tadić, Case No. IT-94-1-A-R77, Judgment on Allegations of Contempt Against Prior Counsel, Milan Vujin, 31 January 2000, para. 24.I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Tadić, Case No. IT-94-1-A-R77, Judgment on Allegations of Contempt Against Prior Counsel, Milan Vujin, 31 January 2000, para. 24.I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Marijačić and Rebić, IT-95-14-R77.2, Trial Chamber Judgement, 10 March 2006, para. 15.I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Marijačić and Rebić, IT-95-14-R77.2, Trial Chamber Judgement, 10 March 2006, para. 15.I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Aleksovski, IT-95-14/1-AR77, Judgment on appeal by Anto Nobilo against finding of contempt, 30 May 2001, para. 39.I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Aleksovski, IT-95-14/1-AR77, Judgment on appeal by Anto Nobilo against finding of contempt, 30 May 2001, para. 39.I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Margetić, IT-95-14-R77.6, Sentencing judgement, 7 February 2007, para. 13.I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Margetić, IT-95-14-R77.6, Sentencing judgement, 7 February 2007, para. 13.S.C.S.L. Independent Counsel v. Brima, et al., SCSL-04-16-AR77, Decision on Defence Appeal Motion pursuant to Rule 77(J) on Both the Imposition of Interim Measures and an Order pursuant to Rule 77(C)(iii), 23 June 2005, para. 26.S.C.S.L. Independent Counsel v. Brima, et al., SCSL-04-16-AR77, Decision on Defence Appeal Motion pursuant to Rule 77(J) on Both the Imposition of Interim Measures and an Order pursuant to Rule 77(C)(iii), 23 June 2005, para. 26.S.C.S.L. Independent Counsel v. Samura, SCSL-2005-01, Judgment in Contempt Proceedings, 26 October 2005, para. 16.S.C.S.L. Independent Counsel v. Samura, SCSL-2005-01, Judgment in Contempt Proceedings, 26 October 2005, para. 16.S.T.L. Re Al Jadeed [Co.] S.A.L./New TV S.A.L. (N.T.V.), Karma Mohamed Thasin Al Khayat, STL-14-05/T/CJ, Public Redacted Version of Judgment, 18 September 2015, para. 34.S.T.L. Re Al Jadeed [Co.] S.A.L./New TV S.A.L. (N.T.V.), Karma Mohamed Thasin Al Khayat, STL-14-05/T/CJ, Public Redacted Version of Judgment, 18 September 2015, para. 34.S.T.L. Re Al Jadeed [Co.] S.A.L./New TV S.A.L. (N.T.V.), Karma Mohamed Thasin Al Khayat, STL-14-05/PT/AP/AR126.1, Decision on Interlocutory Appeal Concerning Personal Jurisdiction in Contempt Proceedings, 2 October 2014, para. 32.S.T.L. Re Al Jadeed [Co.] S.A.L./New TV S.A.L. (N.T.V.), Karma Mohamed Thasin Al Khayat, STL-14-05/PT/AP/AR126.1, Decision on Interlocutory Appeal Concerning Personal Jurisdiction in Contempt Proceedings, 2 October 2014, para. 32.S.T.L. The Prosecutor v. Ayyash, et al., STL-11-01/PT/PTJ, Order for Immediate Removal of Disseminated Material and Cessation of Dissemination, 10 August 2012.S.T.L. The Prosecutor v. Ayyash, et al., STL-11-01/PT/PTJ, Order for Immediate Removal of Disseminated Material and Cessation of Dissemination, 10 August 2012.I.C.C. Prosecutor v. Bemba Gombo, et al., ICC-01/05-01/13-1093-Anx, Protocol on the Handling of Confi dential Information during Investigations and Contact between a Party and Witnesses of the other Parties, 20 July 2015.I.C.C. Prosecutor v. Bemba Gombo, et al., ICC-01/05-01/13-1093-Anx, Protocol on the Handling of Confi dential Information during Investigations and Contact between a Party and Witnesses of the other Parties, 20 July 2015.I.C.C. Prosecutor v. Bemba Gombo, et al., ICC-01/05-01/13-T-10-Red-ENG, 29 September 2015, p.66, lns.14-24., p.72, ln.24 - p.73, ln.1.I.C.C. Prosecutor v. Bemba Gombo, et al., ICC-01/05-01/13-T-10-Red-ENG, 29 September 2015, p.66, lns.14-24., p.72, ln.24 - p.73, ln.1.I.C.C. Prosecutor v. Ruto and Sang, ICC-01/09-01/11-458-AnxA-Corr, Protocol Establishing a Redaction Regime in the Case of the Prosecutor v. Ruto and Sang, 5 October 2012.I.C.C. Prosecutor v. Ruto and Sang, ICC-01/09-01/11-458-AnxA-Corr, Protocol Establishing a Redaction Regime in the Case of the Prosecutor v. Ruto and Sang, 5 October 2012.I.C.C. Prosecutor v. Ntaganda, ICC-01/04-02/06-411-AnxA, Protocol Establishing a Redaction Regime in the Case of the Prosecutor v. Ntaganda, 12 December 2014.I.C.C. Prosecutor v. Ntaganda, ICC-01/04-02/06-411-AnxA, Protocol Establishing a Redaction Regime in the Case of the Prosecutor v. Ntaganda, 12 December 2014.I.C.C. Prosecutor v. Gbagbo, ICC-02/11-01/11-737-AnxA, Protocol Establishing a Redaction Regime in the Case of the Prosecutor v. Laurent Gbagbo, 15 December 2014.I.C.C. Prosecutor v. Gbagbo, ICC-02/11-01/11-737-AnxA, Protocol Establishing a Redaction Regime in the Case of the Prosecutor v. Laurent Gbagbo, 15 December 2014.Guidelines Governing the Relations between the Court and Intermediaries for the Organs and Units of the Court and Counsel working with intermediaries. March 2014. P. 6. URL: http://www.legal-tools.org/uploads/tx_ltpdb/GRCI-Eng_02.pdf (дата обращения - 7.03.2016).Guidelines Governing the Relations between the Court and Intermediaries for the Organs and Units of the Court and Counsel working with intermediaries. March 2014. P. 6. URL: http://www.legal-tools.org/uploads/tx_ltpdb/GRCI-Eng_02.pdf (дата обращения - 7.03.2016).I.C.T.Y. Re Florence Hartmann, IT-02-54-R77.5, Judgment on Allegations of Contempt, 14 September 2009, para.20 (Hartmann Trial Judgment).I.C.T.Y. Re Florence Hartmann, IT-02-54-R77.5, Judgment on Allegations of Contempt, 14 September 2009, para.20 (Hartmann Trial Judgment).Re Florence Hartmann, IT-02-54-R77.5-А, Judgment, 19 July 2011.Re Florence Hartmann, IT-02-54-R77.5-А, Judgment, 19 July 2011.I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Blaškić, IT-95-14, Judgement, 3 March 2000, para.254 (Blaškić Judgment).I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Blaškić, IT-95-14, Judgement, 3 March 2000, para.254 (Blaškić Judgment).S.C.S.L. Prosecutor v. Brima, Kamara and Kanu, SCSL-04-16-T, Judgment, 20 June 2007, p.570-571 (Brima, et al. Judgment).S.C.S.L. Prosecutor v. Brima, Kamara and Kanu, SCSL-04-16-T, Judgment, 20 June 2007, p.570-571 (Brima, et al. Judgment).S.C.S.L. Prosecutor v. Brima, Kamara and Kanu, SCSL-04-16-T, Sentencing Judgment, 19 July 2007, p.36.S.C.S.L. Prosecutor v. Brima, Kamara and Kanu, SCSL-04-16-T, Sentencing Judgment, 19 July 2007, p.36.S.C.S.L. Prosecutor v. Bangura, Kargbo, Kanu, Kamara, SCSL-2011-02-T, Judgment in Contempt Proceedings, 25 September 2012.S.C.S.L. Prosecutor v. Bangura, Kargbo, Kanu, Kamara, SCSL-2011-02-T, Judgment in Contempt Proceedings, 25 September 2012.I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Aleksovski, IT-95-14/1-AR77, Judgment on appeal by Anto Nobilo against fi nding of contempt, 30 May 2001, para.54 (Nobilo Judgment).I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Aleksovski, IT-95-14/1-AR77, Judgment on appeal by Anto Nobilo against fi nding of contempt, 30 May 2001, para.54 (Nobilo Judgment).Eser A. Mental Element - Mistake of Fact and Mistake of Law // The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary / Ed. by A. Cassese, P. Gaeta, J. Jones. Vol.I. OUP Oxford, 2002. P. 931.Eser A. Mental Element - Mistake of Fact and Mistake of Law // The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary / Ed. by A. Cassese, P. Gaeta, J. Jones. Vol.I. OUP Oxford, 2002. P. 931.S.C.S.L. In The Matter of Contempt Proceedings Arising from the Case of The Prosecutor v. Taylor, SCSL-12-01-T, Judgment in Contempt Proceedings, 19 October 2012, para.39.S.C.S.L. In The Matter of Contempt Proceedings Arising from the Case of The Prosecutor v. Taylor, SCSL-12-01-T, Judgment in Contempt Proceedings, 19 October 2012, para.39.I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Blaškić, IT-95-14-A, Judgment, 29 July 2004, para.39.I.C.T.Y. Prosecutor v. Blaškić, IT-95-14-A, Judgment, 29 July 2004, para.39.Model Penal Code, § 2.02(c). URL: http://www.dubberkelman.com/restricted/student_cd/web/MPC/PART1/snippets/mental.htm (дата обращения - 13.03.2016).Model Penal Code, § 2.02(c). URL: http://www.dubberkelman.com/restricted/student_cd/web/MPC/PART1/snippets/mental.htm (дата обращения - 13.03.2016).Recklessness or Indirect Intent // Cassese’s International Criminal Law / 3rd ed. Oxford University Press, 2013. P. 46.Recklessness or Indirect Intent // Cassese’s International Criminal Law / 3rd ed. Oxford University Press, 2013. P. 46.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.