Internationally Mandatory Rules: Different Theories Explaining the Mechanism of their Application (Part II)
https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2010-2-48-69
Abstract
The article examines different theories, which were proposed in Western European literature for explanation of the notion of internationally mandatory rules (art. 1192 of Russian Civil Code). The content, advantages and disadvantages of the following theories are analyzed: theory of strictly territorial application of public law rules, special connection theory, theory of the proper law of contract, theory of taking internationally mandatory rules into consideration as facts of the case, as well as theory of special multilateral conflict of law rules.
The author does not recommend using different criteria in order to determine the opportunity of taking into consideration the internationally mandatory rules of lex contractus, on the one hand, and internationally mandatory rules of third states, on the other hand. The author comes to the conclusion that the most promising are the special connection theory and theory of taking internationally mandatory rules into consideration as facts of the case, as well as their combination, which means the opportunity of application of this or that internationally mandatory rule on two consecutive levels – level of international private law and substantive law level.
About the Author
A. V. Asoskov
Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anton V. Asoskov – Ph.D. in Law, master of private law, assistant professor at the Chair of Civil Law, Faculty of Law;
Arbitrator in ICAC
Office No.745, MSU, Uchebniy Korpus 1, Leninskiye Gory, Moscow 119991
References
1. Брун М.И. Публичный порядок в МЧП. Петроград, 1916. –97 с.
2. Лунц Л.А. Курс международного частного права: в 3 тт. М., 2002. –1007 c.
3. Узойкин Д.А. Валютные сделки, лишенные исковой силы // Законодательство. 2001. № 8.
4. Эбке В. Международное валютное право. Пер.с нем. М., 1997. –332 с.
5. Basedow J. Conflicts of Economic Regulation // Am. J. Comp. L. 1994. Vol. 42. P. 423-447.
6. Bonomi A. Mandatory Rules in Private International Law. The quest for uniformity of decisions in a global environment // Yearbook of Private International Law. Vol.I. 1999. P. P. 215-247.
7. Fawcett J. A United Kingdom Perspective on the Rome I Regulation. // La Nuova Disciplina Comunitaria della Legge Applicabile ai Contratti (Roma I). Ed. N. Boschiero. 2009. P. 191-224.
8. Honsell H., Vogt N., Schnyder A., Berti St. Internationales Privatrecht. 2. Auflage. 2007. ß 1975 S.
9. Internationales Vertragsrecht. Das internationale Privatrecht der Schuldverträge. Hrsg. Christoph Reithmann, Dieter Martiny. 7. Auflage. 2010. –2179 S.
10. Kaye P. The New Private International Law of Contract of the European Community. Implementation of the EEC’s Contractual Obligations Convention in England and Wales under the Contracts (Applicable Law) Act 1990. 1993. – 515 P.
11. Kegel G., Schurig Kl. Internationales Privatrecht: ein Studienbuch. 9. Aufl. 2004. – 1190 S.
12. Kunda I. Internationally Mandatory Rules of a Third Country in European Contract Conflict of Laws. The Rome Convention and the Proposed Rome I Regulation. 2007. – 402 p.
13. Proctor Ch. Mann on the Legal Aspect of Money. 6th ed. 2005. – 831 P.
14. Schweizerisches Privatrecht. Band XI. Internationales Privatrecht. Hrsg. D. Girsberger. Teilband 1. Allgemeine Lehren. A. Furrer, D. Girsberger, K. Siehr. 2008. – 395 S.
15. Siehr K. Ausländische Eingriffsnormen im inländischen Wirtschaftskollisionsrecht // RabelsZ. 1988. Band 52. S. 41-103.
16. Siehr K. Das Internationale Privatrecht der Schweiz. 2002. – 797 S.
17. Vischer Fr. Connecting factors / International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law. Vol. III Private International Law. Chief Ed. K. Lipstein. Chapter 4. 1999.
18. Vischer Fr. General Course on Private International Law // Recueil des Cours / Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law. Vol. 232. 1992-I. P. 9-256.
19. von Bar Chr., Mankowski P. Internationales Privatrecht. Band I. Allgemeine Lehren. 2. Auflage. 2003. – 745 S.
20. Zeppenfeld M. Die allseitige Anknüpfung von Eingriffsnormen im internationalen Wirtscaftsrecht. 2001. – 186 S.
Review
For citations:
Asoskov A.V. Internationally Mandatory Rules: Different Theories Explaining the Mechanism of their Application (Part II). Moscow Journal of International Law. 2010;(2):48-69. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2010-2-48-69
Views:
404
Email this article 