Preview

Moscow Journal of International Law

Advanced search

Prospects for Criminal Prosecution of George W. Bush

https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2012-3-57-76

Abstract

The author explores legal prospects for criminal prosecution of George W. Bush in foreign courts for sanctioning the use of “enhanced interrogation techniques” to extract information from detainees in U.S. special prisons. She analyses whether decision by former U.S. president to authorize torture against suspected terrorists can be qualified as his “official acts” covered by functional immunity. The purpose of the article is to establish the potential existence of a rule of customary international law providing for an exception from immunity of ex-heads of state who have committed international crimes, in particular, torture. In order to do that, the author analyses national jurisprudence (criminal cases against A.Pinochet, H.Habré and D.Bauterse), decisions by international courts, non-official codifications of international law of immunities, and legal writings. She also studies the question of whether commission of international crimes entails the exception from state immunity and immunity of state officials ratione materiae from foreign civil jurisdiction.

About the Author

S. V. Shatalova
MGIMO-University MFA Russia
Russian Federation

Svetlana V. Shatalova ‒ Second Secretary, Embassy of the Russian Federation in the United States of America, postgraduate student of the Chair of International Law



References

1. Иммунитет государственных должностных лиц от уголовного преследования. Меморандум Секретариата. Комиссия международного права ООН. Шестидесятая сессия. Документ А/CN.4/596. 251 c.

2. Колодкин Р.А. Второй доклад об иммунитете должностных лиц государства от иностранной уголовной юрисдикции. Комиссия международного права ООН. Шестьдесят вторая сессия. 10 июня 2010 г. Документ А/CN.4/631. 63 с.

3. Akande D., Shah S. Immunities of State Officials, International Crimes, and Foreign Domestic Courts // European Journal of International Law. Vol. 21 (2011). No. 4. Pp. 815-852.

4. Alebeek R. Immunity of States and Their Officials in International Criminal Law and International Human Rights Law. Oxford University Press. 2008. 449 p.

5. Bianchi A. Immunity versus Human Rights: The Pinochet Case // European Journal of International Law. Vol. 10 (1999). No. 2. Pp. 237-277.

6. Caplan, L.M. State Immunity, Human Rights, and Jus Cogens: a Critique of the Normative Hierarchy Theory // AJIL. Vol. 97 (2003). Pp. 741-781.

7. Cassese A. When May Senior State Officials be Tried for International Crimes? Some Comments on The Congo v. Belgium Case // European Journal of International Law. No. 13 (2002). No. 4. Pp. 853-875.

8. Verhoeven J. Les immunités de jurisdiction et d’exécution. Rapport proviso ire // Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit international. Vol. 69 (2000-2001). 2009.

9. Watts, A. The Legal Position in International Law of Heads of States, Heads of Governments and Foreign Ministers // Recueil des cours. Académie de droit international. Vol. 247 (1994-III).

10. Wirth, S. Immunity for Core Crimes? The ICJ’s Judgment in the Congo v. Belgium Case // European Journal of International Law. Vol. 13 (2002). No. 4. Pp. 877-893.


Review

For citations:


Shatalova S.V. Prospects for Criminal Prosecution of George W. Bush. Moscow Journal of International Law. 2012;(3):57-76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2012-3-57-76

Views: 487


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0869-0049 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0893 (Online)