Preview

Moscow Journal of International Law

Advanced search

SPS Measures as Hidden Barriers to International Trade within WTO and EAEU (theory and practice)

https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2020-1-66-78

Abstract

INTRODUCTION. Since there are many threats in the modern world, states consider the essence of security in its various manifestations. A rather extensive understanding of security should be noted, as this concept applies to multiple directions of our life. So-called SPS measures are one of the vectors aimed at ensuring safety (protection) of human life and health. The scientific literature covers rather extensively SPS measures, taken by states, which include mandatory sanitary, veterinary and quarantine phytosanitary requirements and procedures. The novelty of the study is that SPS measures will be analyzed in terms of their use as hidden barriers to international trade, as well as how often they are used when a particular sanitary or phytosanitary measure imposed by a state or maintained in force by a member of an international organization restrains or can potentially restrain export of its goods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. In international trade certain issues of the contemplated problem are regulated by Article XX of GATT, as well as by the Special Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS Agreement). Security measures reflected in the Article XXI of GATT-94 are not considered.

RESEARCH RESULTS. Th author concluded that SPS measures construe hidden barriers to international trade. However, it is possible to establish "rules of the game", to agree on this problem in concluded agreements on the rules of application of SPS measures, minimizing the possibility of their unfair use. As for the EAEU law, it affects the development of international norms in the field under consideration.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS. The urgency of the issues dealt with in the article is based on the fact that every resident of any state in one way or another wants to be sure of the safety of all that he consumes and that the state or a number of states within the framework of an international organization are obliged to ensure this. The Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) is no exception, it also faces similar tasks. The article analyzes the results of activities in the sphere of decision-making on SPS measures and the framework of the international organization of regional economic integration – the EAEU.

About the Author

N. A. Vorontsova
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) MFA Russia
Russian Federation

Natalia A. Vorontsova, Doctor of Juridical Sciences, Professor at the Department of International Law 

76, pr. Vernadskogo, Moscow, Russian Federation, 119454



References

1. Alcover M. Russian Federation – Measures on the Importation of Live Pigs, Pork and Other Pig Products from the European Union (Russia–Pigs (EU)), DS475. – World Trade Review. 2017. Vol. 16. No.4. P. 757-761. DOI: 10.1017/S1474745617000404

2. Antonova D, Gal'tseva M., Tsaplina A. Podkhody k ponyatiyu “Sanitarnaya i fitosanitarnaya mera” v prave Vsemirnoi torgovoi organizatsii (VTO) i prave Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza (EAES) [Approaches to the concept of "Sanitary and phytosanitary measure" in the law of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the law of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU)]. – Pravo i ekonomika. 2017. No. 3. P. 16-22. (In Russ.)

3. Anufrieva L.P. EAES i “pravo EAES” v mezhdunarodnopravovom izmerenii [Eurasian Economic Union and «the Law of the Eurasian Economic Union» as per International Law Dimension]. – Moscow Journal of International Law. 2016. No. 4. P. 78-87. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2016-4-48-62

4. Arnautov O.V. Analiz normativnoi bazy Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza v sfere kachestva i bezopasnosti pishchevoi produktsii [Analysis of regulatory framework Eurasian economic union in the field of food quality and safety]. – Kubanskii nauchnyi meditsinskii vestnik. 2016. No. 2. P. 7-12. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2016-2-7-12

5. Bogatyrev A.G., Shulyat'ev I.A. Uregulirovanie mezhdunarodnykh torgovykh sporov v ramkakh Vsemirnoi torgovoi organizatsii (VTO) [Settlement of International Commercial Disputes in the World Trade Organization]. – Sovremennyi yurist. 2014. No. 2. P. 56-75. (In Russ.).

6. Boklan D., Lifshits I. Eurasian Economic Union Court and WTO Dispute Settlement Body: two Housewives in one Kitchen. – Russian Law Journal. 2019. Vol. 7. No. 3. P. 169-193. https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2019-7-3-169-193

7. Bosshe, P., Zdouc, W. The law and Policy of the World Trade organization. Text, Cases and Materials. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2013. 1112 p.

8. Boza S., Muñoz J. Factors underlying sanitary and phytosanitary regulation for food and agricultural imports notified by WTO members. – The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development. 2017. Vol. 26. Issue 6. P. 712-723. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2017.1 293712

9. Edelev D.A., Kantere V.M., Matison V.A. Regulirovanie torgovykh otnoshenii v stranakh chlenakh VTO na osnove mnogostoronnikh soglashenii [Regulation of trade relations in WTO member countries through multilateral agreements]. – Pishchevaya promyshlennost'. 2013. No. 9. P. 54-58. (In Russ.)

10. Gulyaeva T.K., Nikitina V.A., Fedosov Ya.K. Printsip nediskriminatsii v “prave VTO” [Principle of non-discrimination in “WTO law”]. – Rossiiskii vneshneekonomicheskii vestnik. 2015. No. 8. P.82-91. (In Russ.)

11. Kadysheva O.V. K voprosu o pretsedentnom kharaktere reshenii Organa po razresheniyu sporov vo Vsemirnoi torgovoi organizatsii [To a question about precedential value of decisions of the dispute settlement body of the World Trade Organization]. – Evraziiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal. 2014. No. 6. P. 97-101. (In Russ.)

12. Lifshits I.M. Chlenstvo Evropeiskogo soyuza v mezhdunarodnykh organizatsiyakh v kontekste ego pravosub"ektnosti [EU Membership in International Organizations in the Context of its Personality]. – Moscow Journal of International Law. 2015. No.1. P. 54-67. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-20191-54-67

13. Mitin A.N. Chto my znaem o printsipakh i pravilakh VTO? [What do we know about WTO principles and rules?]. – Pravo Vsemirnoi torgovoi organizatsii: vliyanie na ekonomiku i zakonodatel'stvo gosudarstv EvropeiskoAziatskogo regiona. Otv. red. V.D. Perevalov [Law of the World Trade Organization: influence on the economy and legislation of the States of the European-Asian region. Ed. by V.D. Perevalov]. Moscow: Statut Publ. 2014. P. 22-27. (In Russ.)

14. Orefice G. Non-Tariff Measures, Specific Trade Concerns and Tariff Reduction. – World Economy. 2017. Vol. 40. Issue 9. P. 1807-1835. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12447

15. Rachkov I.V. Vsemirnaya torgovaya organizatsiya: pravo i instituty [World Trade Organization: law and institutions]. Moscow: Institut prava i publichnoi politiki Publ. 2019. 294 p. (In Russ.)

16. Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures and Non-tariff Barriers to Trade under the WTO and Cotonou Agreements. CTA International Seminar. Brussels. 2002. 21 p. URL: https:// www.tcd.ie/Economics/staff/amtthews/FoodPolicy/CourseMaterials/Readings/O%27Connor_SPS_barriers.pdf (accessed 16.09.2019).

17. Shumilov V.M. Fenomen prava VTO i zakonodatel'stvo Rossii [The Phenomenon of WTO Law and Russia’s legislation]. – Sovremennyi yurist. 2013. No. 2. P. 88-106. (In Russ.)

18. Smbatyan A. S. Vsemirnaya torgovaya organizatsiya: unikal'nost' i adekvatnost' [World Trade Organization: uniqueness and adequacy]. – Pravo VTO. 2012. No. 1.P. 4-11. (In Russ.)

19. Vorontsova N.A. Liberalizatsiya torgovli v ramkakh Evraziiskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza (na primere Soglasheniya EAES-V'etnam) [Trade Liberalization within the Eurasian Economic Union (the Case of the EAEUVietnam Agreement)]. – Moscow Journal of International Law. 2015. No. 4. P. 103-115. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2015-4-103-115

20. Vorontsova N.A. Pravovoi analiz polozhenii Dogovora o Evraziiskom ekonomicheskom soyuze [Legal Analysis of the Agreement on the Eurasian Economic Union]. – Moscow Journal of International Law. 2014. No. 4. P. 7887. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-00492014-4-78-87

21. Vorontsova N.A. Vsemirnaya torgovaya organizatsiya: k voprosu ob uproshchenii tamozhennykh protsedur torgovli. Chast' I [World Trade Organization: on the facilitation of customs procedures for trade. Part I]. – Moscow Journal of International Law. 2018. No. 1. P.44-59. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-20181-44-59

22. Weiler J.H.H. [et al.]. International and Regional Trade Law: The Law of the World Trade Organization Unit VIII: General Exceptions. 2017. 137 p. URL: http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/wp-content/uploads/WTOUnit-8-General-Exceptions-2017-editon.pdf (accessed 16.09.2019).

23. Zenkin I.V. Mezhdunarodnoe torgovoe parvo [International Trade Law]. Moscow: Tsentral'nyi izdatel'skii dom Publ. 2010. 462 p. (In Russ.)

24. Carreau D., Juillard P. Droit international économique (Russ. ed.: Carreau D., Juillard P. Mezhdunarodnoe ekonomicheskoe pravo. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya Publ. 2002. 580 p.)


Review

For citations:


Vorontsova N.A. SPS Measures as Hidden Barriers to International Trade within WTO and EAEU (theory and practice). Moscow Journal of International Law. 2020;(1):66-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2020-1-66-78

Views: 2173


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0869-0049 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0893 (Online)