The Procedure for Admitting New Members to the European Union: Legal Aspect
https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2024-3-63-78
Abstract
INTRODUCTION. The article is devoted to the process of accession of new states to the European Union (EU). The authors try to demonstrate the evolution of the procedure for admitting new members since the formation of the European Communities and identify the main subjects of this procedure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. The current research is based on various international legal documents, including the founding treaties of the European Union, as well as acts of EU institutions and doctrinal sources.
RESEARCH RESULTS. The research represents a retrospective analysis of the formation of the procedure for accession of new members to the European Communities/EU. It was found out that the norms of the founding agreement set only the general legal framework of the procedure, and its specific content differed through out the existence of the European integration project. The actual content of the accession process is determined by the member states, which, through the institutions of the Communities/Union, primarily the Council and the European Council, formulate the criteria and principles of accession. The Commission also plays a significant role in the process. The role of the European Parliament in this procedure is insignificant, although this institution tries to increase its influence throughout the negotiation process.
DISCUSSION AND COCLUSION. To sum up, the accession procedure is typologically close to a special legislative procedure. Since its origin the accession of new states to the EU has been transformed from a rule-making procedure enshrined in the founding treaties to a set of various instruments and practices, including non-legal (political) ones.
About the Authors
N. N. Mazaeva
Russian Foreign Trade Academy
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalya N. Mazaeva - Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of International Law, Dean of the Faculty of International Law
6A, Vorobyovskoe highway, Moscow, 119285
I. V. Astapenko
Russian Foreign Trade Academy
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ilya V. Astapenko - Post-graduate student
6A, Vorobyovskoe highway, Moscow, 119285
References
1. Armakolas I., Triantafyllou G. Greece and EU enlargement to the Western Balkans: understanding an ambivalent relationship. – Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies. 2017. Vol. 17. Issue 4. P. 1-19.
2. Bélanger M.-E., Schimmelfennig F. Politicization and rebordering in EU enlargement: membership discourses in European parliaments. – Journal of European Public Policy. 2021. Vol. 28. Issue 3. P. 407-426. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2021.1881584.
3. Cvetkova Ju.V. Mehanizm rasshirenija Evropejskogo sojuza na sovremennom jetape [The mechanism of enlargement of the European Union at the present stage]. – Nauchnye trudy Severo-Zapadnogo instituta upravlenija RANHiGS [Scientific works of the North-West Institute of Management of RANEPA]. 2017. № 2 (29). T. 8. S. 181-190. (In Russ.)
4. Hillion Ch. The Creeping Nationalisation of the EU Enlargement Policy. Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies (SIEPS). 2010. Report No. 6. Stockholm, November.
5. Huszka B. Human Rights on the Losing end of EU Enlargement: The Case of Serbia. – JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies. 2017. P. 1-16.
6. Janse R. Is the European Commission a credible guardian of the values? A revisionist account of the Copenhagen political criteria during the Big Bang enlargement. – International Journal of Constitutional Law. 2019. Vol. 17. Issue 1. P. 43-65.
7. Klygin A.V. Turcija v sovremennyh evrointegracionnyh processah [Türkiye in modern European integration processes]. – Materialy H ezhegodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii «Evropa regionov» [Proceedings of the X annual scientific and practical conference “Europe of Regions”]. Belgorod: Izd-vo «Jepicentr». 2022. S. 10-15. (In Russ.)
8. Kochenov D. EU Enlargement Law: History and Recent Developments: Treaty – Custom Concubinage? – European Integration online Papers. 2005. Vol. 9. Issue 6. P. 1-23.
9. Kochenov D., Janse R. Admitting Ukraine to the EU: Article 49 TEU is the “Special Procedure”. – EU Law Live. 2022. March 30.
10. Lorca A.A. The evolution of the European Union enlargement policy: a historical approach to the Copenhagen criteria. – 20 Years of EU Membership Paper Series. 2024. P. 3-14.
11. Maniokas K. Methodology of the EU Enlargement: a Critical Appraisal. – Lithuanian foreigh policy review. 2000. Vol. 5. P. 35-60.
12. Meyhew А. Recreating Europe: The European Union’s Policy towards Central and Eastern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1998.
13. Nicholson F, East R. From Six to Twelve. The Enlargement of the European Communities. Longman. 1987. 298 p.
14. Sasse G. The Politics of Conditionality: The Norm of Minority Protection before and after EU Accession. – Journal of European Public Policy. 2008. Vol. 15. Issue 6. P. 844.
15. Shherbak I.N. Evropejskij sojuz – Zapadnye Balkany: dinamika integracii [European Union – Western Balkans: integration dynamics]. – Nauchno-analiticheskij vestnik IE RAN [Scientific and Analytical Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences]. 2024. № 2. S. 37-47. (In Russ.)
16. Snyder F. Soft Law and Institutional practice in the European Community. – European University Institute Law Working Paper. 1993. № 93/5.
17. Tatham A. Enlargement of the European Union. Wolters Kluwer Law & Business. 2009. 592 p.
18. Trykanova S.A., Cyvarev D.A. Problemy rasshirenija ES [Problems of EU enlargement]. – Innovacii. Nauka. Obrazovanie [Innovations. Science. Education]. 2021. № 40. S. 855-859. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Mazaeva N.N., Astapenko I.V. The Procedure for Admitting New Members to the European Union: Legal Aspect. Moscow Journal of International Law. 2024;(3):63-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2024-3-63-78
Views:
341
Email this article 