Trial in absentia and the modern international criminal procedure
https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2023-1-76-85
Abstract
INTRODUCTION. The article discusses the theoretical and practical problems of conducting trials in the absence of the accused (in absentia) in international criminal courts and tribunals.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. The article is based on international human rights treaties that regulate the rights of the accused in criminal proceedings, the statutory and procedural documents of these courts, and the practice of interpreting and applying the right of the accused to be present at the trial.
RESEARCH RESULTS. International human rights treaties establish the minimum rights of the accused in criminal proceedings. Among these rights is the right of the accused to be present at the trial. However, the practice of interpreting this right by the relevant conventional international bodies and international criminal courts and tribunals imposes significant limitations. A number of such restrictions appear to be both reasonable and justified. However, in many cases the restrictions are arbitrary and their justification is legally flawed.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS. Universal and a number of regional international human rights treaties, in particular, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 1966 contain norms that are binding not only for states in their application of national law, but also establish general human rights standards in international law. Due to this circumstance, the provisions of such treaties bind any institutions operating directly in the system of international law, in particular, international criminal courts and tribunals. Thus, international criminal courts and tribunals are bound by the provisions of these treaties, not only in terms of their implementation, but also in terms of their interpretation. The practice of these courts demonstrates a very inconsistent application and not always convincing interpretation of the rights of the accused in general and the right to be tried in his presence. Currently, this practice is trying to change the previously formed trend towards increasingly severe restrictions on exceptions to the right of the accused to be tried in his presence.
About the Author
A. B. Mezyaev
University of Management “TISBI”
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander B. Mezyaev, Doctor of Juridical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Constitutional and International Law
13, ul. Mushtari, Kazan, 420012
References
1. Benderskaya E.G. Rassmotrenie ugolovnogo dela v otsutstvie podsudimogo: mezhdunarodno-pravovoe regulirovanie i zakonodatel'stvo evropeiskikh gosudarstv [Consideration of a criminal case in the absence of the defendant: international legal regulation and legislation of the European states]. – Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaya yustitsiya. 2009. No. 4. P. 36-40. (In Russ.)
2. Herath E. Trials in Absentia: Jurisprudence and Commentary on the Judgment in Chief Prosecutor v. Abul Kalam Azad in the Bangladesh International Crimes Tribunal. – Harvard International Law Journal. 2014. Vol. 55. P. 1-12. URL: https://harvardilj.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/15/2014/06/HILJ-Online_volume-55_Herath.pdf (accessed 12.01.2023)
3. Ivanov D.V., Korzhenyak A.M., Lapikhina E.C. Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems and International Law. –Moscow Journal of International Law. 2021. No. 3. P.6-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2021-3-6-19
4. Kazakov A. A. Zaochnoe sudebnoe razbiratel'stvo po ugolovnym delam: praktika Evropeiskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka i problemy pravoprimeneniya v Rossii [Trial in absentia in criminal cases: the practice of the European Court of Human Rights and problems of law enforcement in Russia]. – Rossiiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal. 2009. No. 2. P. 214-222. (In Russ.)
5. Kohler H. Global Justice or Global Revenge? International Criminal Justice at the Crossroads. Wein; New York: Springer. 2003. 449 p.
6. Kostenko N.I. Sudoproizvodstvo Mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo suda -osnova mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo protsessa [Judicial proceedings of the International Criminal Court - the basis of the international criminal process]. – Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2001. No. 2. P. 64-67. (In Russ.)
7. Lazutin L. A. [et al.]. Mezhdunarodnoe gumanitarnoe pravo. Voina, pamyat', spravedlivost' (yuridicheskie i istoricheskie aspekty) [International humanitarian law: war,memory, justice (legal and historical aspects)]. Moscow: Yurait Publ. 2020. 312 p. (In Russ.)
8. McDonald G.K. Trial Procedure and Practices. – Substantive and Procedural Aspects of International Criminal Law. The Experience of International and National Courts. Vol. 1. Commentary. Ed. by G.K. McDonald and O. SwaakGoldman. The Hague; London; Boston: Kluwer Law International. 2000. P. 547-622.
9. Mezyaev A.B. Protsess protiv Slobodana Miloshevicha v Gaagskom tribunale: nekotorye mezhdunarodno-pravovye problem [Trial against Slobodan Milosevic in the Hague Tribunal: some international legal problems.]. – Rossiiskii ezhegodnik mezhdunarodnogo prava, 2004 [Russian Yearbook of International Law]. Saint Petersburg: SKF-Neva Publ. 2005. P. 91-103. (In Russ.)
10. Mirovich D. Mezhdunarodnyi tribunal po byvshei Yugoslavii i Evropeiskaya konventsiya o zashchite prav cheloveka [International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the European Convention on Human Rights]. – Kazanskii zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava i mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii 2012. No. 5. S. 216-220.
11. Motrokhin E.Yu. O pravovoi prirode i meste postanovlenii Evropeiskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka v pravovoi sisteme Rossiiskoi Federatsii [On the legal nature and place of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in the legal system of the Russian Federation]. –Kazanskii zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava i mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii. 2015. No. 7. P. 202-208. (In Russ.)
12. Robinson P. Ensuring Fair and Expeditious Trials at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. – European Journal of International Law. 2000. Vol. 11. Issue 3. P. 569-589.
13. Suhfree C. Is The International Criminal Court Biased Against Africa? Justifying the African Narrative of ICC Bias. – Kazanskii zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava i mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii. 2018-2019. No. 10. P. 43-53.
14. Vasyakina E.V. Rol' Vseobshchei Deklaratsii prav cheloveka v deyatel'nosti Mezhdunarodnogo tribunala po byvshei Yugoslavii [The role of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in the activities of the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia]. – Kazanskii zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava i mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii. 2018-2019. No. 10. P. 60-66. (In Russ.)
15. Volevodz A.G. Mezhdunarodnye pravookhranitel'nye organizatsii [International law enforcement organizations]. Moscow: Prospekt Publ. 2011. 344 p. (In Russ.)
16. Vylegzhanin A.N. [et al]. The Term “Rules-based International Order” in International Legal Discourses. –Moscow Journal of International Law. 2021. No. 2. P. 35-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2021-2-35-60
17. Wladimiroff M. Rights of Suspects and Accused. – Substantive and Procedural Aspects of International Criminal Law. The Experience of International and National Courts. Vol. 1. Commentary. Ed. by G.K. McDonald and O. Swaak-Goldman. The Hague; London; Boston: Kluwer Law International. 2000. P. 415-450.
18. Zappala S. Human Rights in International Criminal Proceedings. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2003. 312 p.
Review
For citations:
Mezyaev A.B. Trial in absentia and the modern international criminal procedure. Moscow Journal of International Law. 2023;(1):76-85. https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2023-1-76-85
Views:
1228
Email this article 