International Legal Regulation of Counter-Terrorism in Peacetime and During the Armed Conflicts: a regional approach of the Commonwealth of Independent States

INTRODUCTION. The increase in the number of armed conflicts involving non-State armed groups recognized as terrorist in States and international organizations has been the trend in recent years. In this regard, the question relating to the links between terrorism and armed conflict, as well as between the international legal regulation of combating terrorism and international humanitarian law, is on the agenda. The article examines the regional approaches of the CIS to countering terrorism within armed conflicts and during counter-terrorism operations in peacetime.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. The material for the research included the universal treaties, the model legislation of the CIS on IHL and in the field of combating terrorism, as well as the conceptual documents of the military-strategic cooperation of the CIS member states in particular in identifying areas and forms of countering international terrorism as a modern military threat. The methodological basis of the research included general scientific and private scientific methods of cognition traditional for legal researches.

RESEARCH RESULTS. The research substantiates the hypothesis that within the Commonwealth there were formed the legal regimes, which are based on the generally recognized principles and norms of international law governing the issues of military counteraction to terrorist threats both in peacetime and during armed conflicts. The article analyzes international treaties, model legislation of the CIS and national legal acts of the member states establishing the legitimacy of military methods and means of response to terrorist challenges and threats within the special legal regime of the "counter-terrorist operation". A relevant aspect of the study was the identification of the prospects of military cooperation between the CIS member states through the development of new mechanisms for combating terrorism– "military-police operations" in the system of their joint counter-terrorism activities.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS. In modern realities, it is the most effective to build the counteraction to terrorism within the CTO legal regime which enable to combine law enforcement and military tasks faced by the state within ensuring its internal and external security, and also contains guarantees for ensuring and protecting human rights. Meanwhile, the involvement of the armed forces of the state in combating terrorism does not mean an unequivocal transfer of the situation from peacetime to the regime of martial law. The CIS, conscientiously fulfilling its obligations under the key acts of IHL, has set out in its model legislation the norms prohibiting terrorism during armed conflicts and establishing responsibility for acts of its. In addition, under the auspices of the CIS there has been developed and successfully implemented the model legislation regulating the use of military methods and means of response to terrorist challenges and threats within a special legal regime of a “counter-terrorism operation” separated from the regime of the use of armed forces within the IHL.

1. Aleshin V.V. Protivodeistvie terrorizmu: o realizatsii norm mezhdunarodnogo prava i rossiiskogo zakonodatel'stva [Counterterrorism meassures: application of international law and the law of the Russian Federation]. – Mos-cow Journal of International Law. 2019. No. 4. P. 79–90. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2019-4-79-90

2. Bellal A., Giacca G., Cassey-Maslen S. International law and armed non state actors in Afganistan. — International Review of the Red Cross. 2011. Vol. 93. No. 81. Р. 47—79.

3. Carswell J.E. Klassifikatsiya konflikta: dilemma, stoyashchaya pered voennosluzhashchim [Classification of conflict: a dilemma facing the military]. – Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal Krasnogo Kresta. 2009. No. 847. P. 195—221. (In Russ.)

4. Cherniadyeva N.A. Tendentsii razvitiya mezhdunarodno-pravovoi bor'by s terrorizmom [Trends of development of international legal fight against terrorism]. – Moscow Journal of International Law. No. 4. P. 61—78. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2019-4-61-78

5. Cohen А., Zlotogorski D. Proportionality in International Humanitarian Law Consequences, Precautions, and Procedures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2021. 262 р. DOI:10.1093/oso/9780197556726.001.0001

6. David E. Principes de droit des conflits armés (Russ. ed.: David E. Printsipy prava vooruzhennykh konfliktov. Mos-cow: MKKK Publ. 2011. 1144 p.)

7. Ferraro Т. International humanitarian law, principled humanitarian action, counterterrorism and sanctions: Some perspectives on selected issues. – International Review of the Red Cross. 2021. Vol. 103. Р. 109–155. DOI: 10.1017/S1816383121000965

8. Gasser H.-P Terroristicheskie akty, “terrorizm” i mezhdunarodnoe gumanitarnoe pravo [Acts of Terrorism, "Terrorism" and International Humanitarian Law]. — Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal Krasnogo Kresta. 2002. No. 847. P. 235—268. (In Russ.)

9. Gromoglasova E.S. Sovremennyi voenno-silovoi kontrterrorizm: mezhdunarodno-politicheskii i pravovoi aspekty [The Use of Force in Modern Counter-Terrorism: International Legal and Political Aspects]. — Vestnik RUDN. International Relations. 2016. Vol. 16. No. 3. P. 426—436. (In Russ.)

10. Henckaerts J.-M., Doswald-Beck L. Customary International Law. Volume 1: Rules (Russ.ed.: Henckaerts J.-M., Doswald-Beck L. Obychnoe mezhdunarodnoe gumanitarnoe pravo. Tom. I. Normy. Moscow: MKKK Publ. 2006. 818 p.)

11. International humanitarian law and the challenges of contemporary armed conflicts: Recommitting to protection in armed conflict on the 70th anniversary of the Geneva Conventions. — International Review of the Red Cross. 2019. Vol. 101. Р. 69–949. DOI: 10.1017/S1816383119000523

12. Khlestov O.N., Myshlyaeva M. Vooruzhennaya bor'ba protiv mezhdunarodnogo terrorizma (politiko-pravovye aspekty) [Armed struggle against international terrorism (political and legal aspects)]. — Moscow Journal of International Law. 2001. No. 4. P. 11—21. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2001-4-11-21

13. Kochubei M.A., Mareev P.L. Sovmestnaya voenno-politseiskaya operatsiya v sisteme kontrterroristicheskoi deyatel'nosti stran SNG (teoreticheskii aspekt) [Joint military-police operation in the system of counter-terrorism activities of the CIS countries (theoretical aspect)]. — Mezhdunarodnoe sotrudnichestvo evraziiskikh gosudarstv: politika, ekonomika, pravo. 2020. No. 4. P. 56—71. (In Russ.)

14. Kotlyarov I.I. Mezhdunarodno-pravovoe regulirovanie vooruzhennykh konfliktov (osnovnye teoreticheskie problemy i praktika): monografiya [International legal regulation of armed conflicts (main theoretical problems and practice): a monograph]. Moscow: Yurlitinform Publ. 2013. 504 p. (In Russ.)

15. Kotlyarov I.I., Puzyreva Yu.V. Mezhdunarodnoe gumanitarnoe pravo i model'noe zakonodatel'stvo SNG [International Humanitarian Law and the Model Legislation of the CIS]. — Moscow Journal of International Law. 2012. No.3. P. 18-38. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2012-3-18-38

16. Radzhabov S.A. Vooruzhennyi konflikt v Afganistane: uchastniki, pravovaya kvalifikatsiya i primenyaemoe pravo [Armed Conflict in Afghanistan: Participants, Legal Qualifications, and Applicable Law]. — Rossiiskii ezhegodnik mezhdunarodnogo prava. Spetsial'nyi vypusk [Russian Yearbook of International Law. Special Issue]. Saint Petersburg: SKF “Rossiya-Neva”. 2013. P. 320-337. (In Russ.)

17. Rusinova V.N. Prava cheloveka v vooruzhennykh konfliktakh: problemy sootnosheniya norm mezhdunarodnogo gumanitarnogo prava i mezhdunarodnogo prava prav cheloveka: monografiya. 2-e izd. [Human Rights in Armed Conflicts: Problems of Correlation Between International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law: a monograph. 2nd ed.]. Moscow: Statut Publ. 2017. 398 p. (In Russ.)

18. Sassòli M. International Humanitarian Law: Rules, Controversies, and Solutions to Problems Arising in Warfare. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. 2019. 656 p.

19. Saul B. From conflict to complementarity: Reconciling international counterterrorism law and international humanitarian law. – International Review of the Red Cross. 2021. Vol. 103. Р. 157–202. DOI:10.1017/S181638312100031X

20. Shetai V. Vklad Mezhdunarodnogo suda v mezhdunarodnoe gumanitarnoe pravo [The contribution of the International Court of Justice to international humanitarian law]. — Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal Krasnogo Kresta. 2003. No. 850. P. 89-128. (In Russ.)

21. Sinyakin I.I. Perspektivy mezhdunarodno-pravovogo sotrudnichestva po bor'be s terrorizmom [Prospects for the International Legal Cooperation in the Struggle against Terrorism]. — Moscow Journal of International Law. 2017. No. 1. P. 78–87. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2017-1-78-87