Personal Inviolability of Members of the Diplomatic Mission: current issues of international law

INTRODUCTION. Te establishment of diplomatic relations between States, among other mutual obligations of the parties, is based on the duty of the receiving State to provide appropriate conditions for the efcient performance of the functions of diplomatic mission. To this end, the authorities of the receiving State undertake to ensure respect for the full range of diplomatic immunities and privileges provided both in relation to the mission itself and in relation to diplomatic agents and members of their families. Te members of the diplomatic mission, in turn, undertake not to abuse the special legal status in the receiving State and not to take actions that entail interference in the internal affairs of the receiving State, undermining the security of the latter and going beyond the ofcial actions of the diplomatic mission. However, the diplomatic practice abounds in examples of massive violations of diplomatic immunities and privileges, both by the authorities of the receiving State and third parties, and by the carriers of these immunities and privileges themselves. A special place among these violations is given to the violation of the personal inviolability of diplomatic agents. Te article examines the legal nature of the immunity of personal inviolability, acts of violations in relation to this immunity and the measures taken by states to provide full protection to members of a diplomatic mission and their families.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. In the course of the study, international treaties applicable to the institution of diplomatic immunities and privileges were used, such as: Havana Conventions of 1928, Vienna Convention on diplomatic relations 1961, Vienna Convention on consular relations 1963, Convention on special missions 1969, Convention on the prevention and punishment of crimes against internationally protected persons, including diplomatic agents 1973, the Vienna Convention on the representation of states in their relations with international organizations of a universal character 1975, scientific works on diplomatic and consular law by domestic and foreign authors, as well as judgments concerning violations of diplomatic immunities and privileges. Te methodological basis of the research was formed by the following general scientifc techniques: analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, comparison, classifcation, systematization, forecasting. Were applied and such specifc scientifc methods as formal legal and comparative legal.

RESEARCH RESULTS. Te article provides a comprehensive analysis of the practice of granting and observing diplomatic immunities and privileges, based on the provisions of international treaties and acts of national law of some states. Particular attention is paid to cases of violation of diplomatic immunities and privileges and measures taken by states to prevent similar violations in the future.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS. According to the results of the research, it can be argued that there is a very dangerous tendency in the use of diplomatic immunities and privileges as a weapon of influence on states. It is necessary to develop new measures to ensure full protection of foreign bodies of external relations and their members, to strengthen domestic control over the observance of the legal status, immunities and privileges of these bodies and their members, as well as to strengthen cooperation between states to counter acts of violation directed against internationally protected persons.

1. Ahmad N. The Obligation of Diplomats to Respect the Laws and Regulations of the Hosting State: A Critical Overview of the International Practices. – Laws. 2020. Vol. 9. Issue 3. P. 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/laws9030018

2. Barker J.C. The protection of diplomatic personnel. London: Routledge. 2006. 2017 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315553825

3. Behrens P. Diplomatic Law in a New Millennium. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2017. 434 p.

4. Blishchenko I. P. Diplomaticheskoe pravo [Diplomatic Law]. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola Publ. 1990. 285 p. (In Russ.)

5. Bobylev G. V., Nagieva A. A. 2012. K teoreticheskomu obosnovaniyu diplomaticheskikh immunitetov i privilegii [Toward a Theoretical Justifcation of Diplomatic Immunities and Privileges]. – Sootnoshenie norm mezhdunarodnogo nrava i norm natsional'nogo zakonodatel'stva: aktual'nye problemy mezhdunarodnogo prava: mezhvuzovskii sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Interaction between International Law and Norms of National Legislation: Actual Problems of International Law: Interuniversity Collection of Scientifc Papers]. Ekaterinburg: Izdatel'skii dom “Ural'skaya gosudarstvennaya yuridicheskaya akademiya” Publ. 2012.P. 106–115. (In Russ.)

6. Bogucharskii E.M. Instituty sovremennoi diplomatii: kurs lektsii [Institutions of Modern Diplomacy: A Course of Lectures]. Moscow: MGIMO-Universitet Publ. 2015. 477 p. (In Russ.)

7. Demin Yu. G. Status diplomaticheskikh predstavitel'stv i ikh personala. 2-e izd. [Status of Diplomatic Missions and their Staff. 2nd ed.] Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya Publ. 2010. 224 p. (In Russ.)

8. Denza E. Diplomatic Law: Commentary on the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2016. 472 p.

9. Dixon M., McCorquodale R. Cases and materials on international law. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2003. 628 p.

10. Frey L.S., Frey M.L. The History of Diplomatic Immunity. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University Press. 1999. 727 p.

11. Iskevich I. S., Podolskiy A.V. Diplomaticheskoe i konsul'skoe pravo [Diplomatic and Consular Law]. Tambov: Izd-vo FGBOU VPO “TGTU” Publ. 2014. 136 p. (In Russ.)

12. Levin D. B. Diplomaticheskii immunitet [Diplomatic Immunity]. Moscow; Leningrad: Izd-vo AN SSSR Publ. 1949. 415 p. (In Russ.)

13. Levin D.B. O neprikosnovennosti diplomaticheskikh predstavitel'stv i ikh personala [About Inviolability of Diplomatic Representations and their Personnel]. Moscow: Yuridicheskoe izd-vo Ministerstva Yustitsii SSSR Publ. 1946. 110 p. (In Russ.)

14. Muhammad-Basheer A. Ismail. Islamic Law and Transnational Diplomatic Law: A Quest for Complementarity in Divergent Legal Theories. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 2016. 297 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137558770

15. Nagieva A.A. Diplomaticheskaya zashchita [Diplomatic Protection]. Moscow: MGIMO –Universitet Publ. 2019. 272 p. (In Russ.)

16. Samoilenko V.V. Diplomaticheskaya sluzhba [Diplomatic Service]. Moscow: Norma Publ.; INFRA-M Publ. 2014. 336 p. (In Russ.)

17. Sandrovskii K.K. Diplomaticheskoe pravo [Diplomatic Law]. Kiev: Vysshaya shkola Publ. 1981. 240 p. (In Russ.)

18. Satow E. A Guide To Diplomatic Practice (Russ. ed.: Satow E. Rukovodstvo po diplomaticheskoi praktike. Moscow: Izd-vo Instituta mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii Publ. 1961. 496 p.)

19. Satow’s Diplomatic Practice. 7th ed. Ed. by Sir I. Roberts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.2017. 814 p.

20. Vylegzhanin A.N., Kalamkaryan R.A. Znachenie mezhdunarodnogo obychaya v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave [The Role of International Custom in the Contemporary International Law]. – Moscow Journal of International Law. 2012. No. 2. P. 5–29. (In Russ.). DOI:https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2012-2-5-29

21. Zorin V.A. Osnovy diplomaticheskoi sluzhby. 2-e izd. [Fundamentals of the Diplomatic Service. 2nd ed.] Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya Publ. 1977. 367 p. (In Russ.)