Approaches to Understanding and Normative Definition of the Category “Cybercrime” and Related Concepts in the Practice of Regional International Organizations

INTRODUCTION. Against the background of the unfolding epidemic of coronavirus, the trends in cybercrime that appeared in previous years have reached unprecedented magnitudes. The rapid transfer of many basic spheres of social functioning to a digital platform in an actual legal vacuum provided criminals with almost unlimited opportunities. In these circumstances, the task of improving and unifying the basic categories in the field of combating the «new form of crime» is of paramount interest not only from the point of view of theory, but also in order to create an effective international legal mechanism to counter this threat.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. The material for the study were legal documents developed under the auspices of 14 regional international organizations, which represent one or another regional group, scientific works of foreign and domestic scientists. The methodological basis of the study was the general scientific and private scientific methods of cognition, traditional for legal work.
RESEARCH RESULTS. The study revealed inconsistencies in terminology, the absence of a uniformly understood and applied normative definition of a «new form of crime» and related concepts that would meet the criterion of authenticity. Regional international organizations operate with such concepts as "cybercrime", "attacks against information systems", "crimes in the field of computer information", "crimes in the field of information technology", "information crime", "crimes related to computers and networks", "digital security risks", "the use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) for terrorist and criminal purposes". All this indicates the absence of common approaches to understanding the very essence and specific features of this criminal phenomenon.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS. The author draws attention to the fact that the term "cybercrime" is used in 7 out of 14 groups of international documents of a regional nature. Analysis of the work of domestic and foreign researchers confirms the validity of the use of the term "cybercrime", as most fully and accurately reflecting the unique properties of this type of crime, its technical component. Based on the correlation and comparative study of the terms "information crime", "computer crime", "cybercrime", the author formulates basic provisions that can be taken into account when trying to develop a unified concept. The author draws attention to the fact that, taking into account the specific nature of the object, subject and virtual environment of committing these crimes, any legal norm should be formulated and correlated with the objective possibility of its practical implementation, taking into account technical characteristics.

1. Baturin Yu.M., Zhodzishskii A.M. Komp'yuternaya prestupnost' i komp'yuternaya bezopasnost' [Computer Crime and Computer Security]. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literature Publ. 1991. 160 p. (In Russ.)

2. Boiko O.A. Ponyatie “kiberprestupnost'”: osnovnye definitsii [The Concept of Cybercrime: the main definitions]. – Ugolovnaya yustitsiya: zakonodatel'stvo, teoriya i praktika. Sbornik materialov VІІІ Respublikanskoi nauchnoprakticheskoi konferentsii studentov, magistrantov i aspirantov [Criminal Justice: legislation, theory and practice. Collection of materials of the VIII Republican Scientific and Practical Conference of students, undergraduates and postgraduates]. Brest: BrGU imeni A.S. Pushkina. 2017. P. 123–126. (In Russ.)

3. Bosler A.M., Berenblum Т. Introduction: new directions in cybercrime research. – Journal of Crime and Justice. 2019. Vol. 42. Issue 5. P. 495–499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2019.1692426

4. Buz S. I. Kiberprestupleniya: ponyatie, sushchnost' i obshchaya kharakteristika [Cyber crimes: concept, essence and general characteristic]. – Yurist-Pravoved. 2019. No. 4. P.78–82. (In Russ.)

5. Choi K.S., Lee J.R. Theoretical analysis of cyber-interpersonal violence victimization and offending using cyberroutine activities theory. – Computers in Human Behavior. 2017. Vol. 73 P. 394–402. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.061

6. DiMasi J.A., Hansen R.W., Grabowski H.G. The Price of Innovation: New Estimates of Drug Development Costs. – Journal of Health Economics. 2003. Vol. 22. Issue 2. P. 151–185. DOI:10.1016/S0167-6296(02)00126-1

7. Evdokimov, K. N. Samodeterminatsiya komp'yuternoi prestupnosti v usloviyakh ee transformatsii v tekhnotronnuyu prestupnost' [Self-determination of Computer Crime in the Conditions of its Transformation into Technotronic Vrime]. – Pravovye sredstva obespecheniya natsional'noi bezopasnosti Rossiiskoi Federatsii: istoriya i sovremennost'. Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. Otv. redaktor E.M. Yakimova [Legal Means of Ensuring the National Security of the Russian Federation: history and modernity. Materials of the international scientific and practical conference. Ed. by E.M. Yakimova]. Irkutsk: Baikal'skii gosudarstvennyi universitet Publ. 2020. P. 26–33. (In Russ.)

8. Furnell S.M. Categorising cybercrime and cybercriminals: The problem and potential approaches. – Journal of Information Warfare. 2001. Vol. 1. Issue 2. P. 35–44.

9. Goodman M.D., Brenner S.W. The Emerging Consensus on Criminal Conduct in Cyberspace. – International Journal of Law and Information Technology. 2002. Vol. 10. Issue 2. P. 139–223. DOI: 10.1093/ijlit/10.2.139

10. Gordon S., Ford R. On the Definition and Classification of Cybercrime. – Journal in Computer Virology. 2006. Vol. 2. Issue 1. P. 139–223. DOI: 10.1007/s11416-006-0015-z

11. Grabosky P.N. Virtual Criminality: Old Wine in New Bottles. – Social & Legal Studies. 2001.Vol. 10. Issue 2. P. 243-249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/a017405

12. Ilievski A. An Explanation of the Cybercrime Victimisation: Self-Control and Lifestyle/ Routine Activity Theory. – Innovative Issues and Approaches in Social Sciences. 2016. Vol. 9. Issue 1. P. 30–47. DOI: 10.12959/issn.1855-0541.IIASS-2016- № 1-art02

13. Krylov D.O., Malyugina A.V. K voprosu o terminologii v sfere kiberprestupnosti (na materiale angliiskogo yazyka) [On the Issue of Terminology in the Field of Cybercrime (based on the material of the English language)]. – Mezhdunarodnyi studencheskii nauchnyi vestnik. 2017. No. 1. (In Russ.). URL: https://eduherald.ru/ru/article/view?id=16836 (accessed 15.05.2021)

14. Madriaza P. [et al.]. 6th International Report on Crime Prevention and Community Safety: Preventing Cybercrime. Montréal: International Centre for Prevention of Crime. 2018. 161 p.

15. Moore R. Cybercrime: Investigating High-Technology Computer Crime. New York: Routledge Publ. 2014. 312 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315721767

16. Organizovannyi terrorizm i organizovannaya prestupnost'. Otv. red. A.I. Dolgova [Organized Terrorism and Organized Crime. Ed. by A.I. Dolgova]. Moscow: Rossiiskaya kriminologicheskaya assotsiatsiya Publ. 2002. 128 p. (In Russ.)

17. Parker D.B. Computer crime Criminal Justice Resource Manual. Cambridge, Mass.; Department of Justice. 1989. 223 p.

18. Parker D.B. Fighting Computer Crime: A New Framework for Protecting Information. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1983. 512 p.

19. Petrova I.A., Lobachev I.A. Prestupleniya v sfere komp'yuternoi (tsifrovoi) informatsii: diskussionnye voprosy opredeleniya ponyatiya, ob"ekta ugolovno-pravovoi okhrany i predmeta posyagatel'stv [Crimes in Sphere of Computer (Digital) Information: debatable issues of definition of the concept, object of criminal legal protection and subject of encroachments]. – Zhurnal prikladnykh issledovanii. 2020. No. 1. P. 52-62. (In Russ.)

20. Selivanov N. A. Problemy bor'by s komp'yuternoi prestupnost'yu [Problems of Combating Computer Crimes]. – Zakonnost'. 1993. No. 8. P. 36-40. (In Russ.)

21. Shinder D.L. Cross M. Scene of the Cybercrime. 2nd ed. Burlington, MA : Syngress Pub. 2008. 732 p.

22. Sklyarov S.V., Evdokimov K.N. Sovremennye podkhody k opredeleniyu ponyatiya, struktury i sushchnosti komp'yuternoi prestupnosti v Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Modern Approaches to the Concept, Structure and Nature of Computer Crime in the Russian Federation]. – Criminology Journal of Baikal National University of Economics and Law. 2016. Vol. 10. No. 2. P. 322-330. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17150/1996-7756.2016.10(2).322–330

23. Vekhov V. B. Komp'yuternye prestupleniya: Sposoby soversheniya, metodiki rassledovaniya [Computer crimes: methods of commission, methods of investigation]. Moscow: Pravo i zakon Publ. 1996. 182 p. (In Russ.)

24. Wall D. Cybercrime: The Transphormation of Crime in the Information Age. Cambridge: Polity Press. 2007. 288 p.

25. Wiener N. The Human Use of Human Beings (Russ. ed.: Wiener N. Kibernetika i obshchestvo. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo AST Publ. 228 p.)

26. Yar M. The Novelty of «Cybercrime»: an Assessment in Light of Routine Activity Theory. – European Journal of Criminology. 2005. Vol. 2. Issue 4. P. 407-427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/147737080556056