Justice in the Name of Six Million Accusers: the Case of the Attorney General of the Government of Israel v. Adolf Eichmann in the Context of International Law

INTRODUCTION. The legal saga of the prosecution of Adolf Eichmann, one of the most wanted war criminals and chief “architect” of the Holocaust, raises many ethical, political and legal problems. The Eichmann trial is unprecedented in the long history of international criminal law for many reasons. Although many leaders of Nazi regime were put on trial at Nuremberg before International Military Tribunal, mass killings and other outrageous crimes against Jews was not the main object of the trial. Thereby prosecution and punishment one of the most important organizers of the genocide of Jewish people, creator of new type of evil and new type of crime, become the great task of the State of Israel.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. The theoretical basis of the study consists of the works of leading international lawyers specializing in international criminal law, as well as the international extradition of criminals; the analytical base comprises of the decisions of the Nuremberg International Military Tribunal, as well as the national courts of the State of Israel, in particular the cult decision the Attorney General of the Government of Israel v. Adolf Eichmann, as well as the decisions of the national courts of the United States, cited in the article for the purpose of comparative analysis. The methodological basis of the research comprises historical method, methods of formal logic, including analysis, synthesis and analogy, as well as systemic, comparative legal methods and method of interpretation.
RESEARCH RESULTS. Based on the study of international legal instruments and international judicial practice, as well as the national legislation of the State of Israel, the author made conclusions related to the abduction of accused from the territory of a foreign state, in particular its consequences in the form of violation of the sovereignty of the state. At the same time, the article contains a statement that the unlawfulness of the arrest does not prevent the court from exercising jurisdiction over the person. In the context of the administration of justice by the State of Israel, the author analyzes the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees of December 14, 1951, paying special attention to the problem of the possible immunity of the accused based on the refugee status granted by the state.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS. In the course of the study, the author analyzed a significant amount of materials, summarized the doctrinal positions put forward by a number of prominent international scholars, and also formed the conclusion that the trial of Eichmann marked not only the administration of justice over the international criminal, but also provided another opportunity for a broad international publicity of the horrors of the Nazi regime and the need to unite collective efforts of states to save future generations from such international crimes.

1. Ambos K. Treatise of International Criminal Law. Vol.I: Foundations and General Part. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2021. 656 p. DOI: 10.1093/law/9780199657926.001.0001

2. Annacker C. The Legal Regime of Erga Omnes Obligations in International Law. – Austrian Journal of Public and International Law. 1994. Vol. 46. No. 2. Р. 131-166.

3. Arendt H. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. New York: The Viking Press.1963. 275 p.

4. Argentine Jews or Jewish Argentines? Essays of Ethnicity, Identity, and Diaspora. Ed. by R. Rein. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. 2010.312 p.

5. Asia: Middle East Record. Vol. 1. Ed. by Y. Oron. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. 1962. 582 p.

6. Bach G. Genocide (Holocaust) Trials in Israel. – The Nuremberg Trials: International Criminal Law Since 1945: 60th Anniversary International Conference. Ed. by H.R. Reginbogin, C. Safferling, W. de Gruyter. München: K.G. Sauer Verlag GmbX. 2011. P. 216-223.

7. Baker b., Röben V. To Abduct or to Extradite: Does a Treaty Beg the Question?. – Heidelberg International Law Journal. 1993. Vol. 53. P. 657-688.

8. Bassiouni C. International Crimes: Jus Cogens and Obligatio Erga Omnes. – Law and Contemporary Problems. 1996. Vol. 59. No. 4. P. 63-74.

9. Bassiouni C. Crimes against Humanity: Historical Evolution and Contemporary Application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2011. 884 p.

10. Bassiouni C. Crimes against Humanity in International Criminal Law. 2nd ed. The Hague: Kluwer Law International. 1999. 652 p.

11. Bassiouni C. International Extradition: United States Law and Practice. 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2014. 1233 p.

12. Bazyler M.J., Tuerkheimer F.M. Forgotten Trial of the Holocaust. New York: New York University Press. 2014. 390 p.

13. Bazyler M. J. Holocaust, Genocide, and the Law: A Quest for Justice in a Post-Holocaust World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2016. 281 p. DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195395693.001.0001

14. Bazyler M.J., Scheppach J.Y. The Strange and Curious History of the Law Used to Prosecute Adolf Eichmann. – Loyola of Los Angeles International & Comparative Law Review. 2012. Vol. 34. P. 417-461.

15. Beigbeder Y. International Justice against Impunity: Progress and New Challenges. Boston; Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff. 2005. 247 p.

16. Ben-Naftali O., Tuval Y. Punishing International Crimes Committed by the Persecuted: The Kapo Trials in Israel (1950-1960). – Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2006. Vol. 4. No. 1. P. 128-178.

17. Bilsky L. The Eichmann trial: Towards a jurisprudence of eyewitness testimony of atrocities. – Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2014. Vol. 12. No. 1. P. 27-57.

18. Bilsky L., Klagsburn R. Cultural Genocide: Between Law and History. – The Oxford Handbook of Legal History. Ed. by M. D. Dubber and Chr.Tomlins. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2018. P. 1081-1094. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198794356.013.58

19. Bond J. Principled Exclusion: A Revised Approach to Article1(F)(a) of the Refugee Convention. – Michigan Journal of International Law. 2013. Vol. 35. Issue 1. P. 15-78.

20. Bradley M. Jus Cogens’ Preffered Sister: Obligations Erga Omnes and the International Court of Justice – Fifty Years after the Barcelona Traction. – Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens): Disquisitions and Disputations. Ed. by D. Tladi. Leiden; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. 2021. P. 193-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004464124_009

21. Brown A. Judging “Privileged” Jews: Holocaust Ethics, Representation and the “Grey Zone”. New York: Berghahn. 2015. 222 p.

22. Bryant M. Eichmann in Jerusalem and in West Germany: Eichmann Trial Witnesses and the West German Prosecution of Operation Reinhard Crimes, 1958–1966. – 2012. Loyola of Los Angeles International & Comparative Law Review. Vol.34. P. 339-385

23. Cassese A. 2009. Eichmann: Is Evil So Banal? - Journal of International Criminal Justice. Vol. 7. Issue No. 3. P. 645-652.

24. Cassese’s International Criminal Law. 3rd ed. Ed. by A. Cassese [et. al.]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2013. 472 p.

25. Carlisle J. Extradition of Governments Agents as Municipal Law Remedy for state-Sponsored Kidnapping. – California Law Review. 1993. Vol. 81. Issue.6. P. 1541-1586.

26. Chernichenko S.V. Maksima “pravo ne voznikaet iz pravonarusheniya” i smenyaemost' imperativnykh norm mezhdunarodnogo prava [The Maxim "Law does not arise from the Violation of Law" and the Modification of Peremptory Norms]. – Pravovedenie. 2018. No. 1.P. 6-19. (In Russ.)

27. Cimiotta E. The Relevance of Erga Omnes Obligations in Prosecuting of International Crimes. – Heidelberg Journal of International Law. 2016. Vol. 76. P. 687-713.

28. Colangelo A. Constitutional Limits on Extraterritorial Jurisdiction: Terrorism and the Intersection of National and International Law. – Harvard International Law Journal. 2007. Vol. 48. No. 1. P. 121-201.

29. Cowles W.B. Universality of Jurisdiction over War Crimes. – California Law Review. 1945. Vol. XXXIII. N 2. P. 177-218.

30. Criddle E. Standing for Human Rights Abroad. – Cornell Law Review. 2013. Vol. 100. P. 269-333.

31. Cryer R. Prosecuting International Crimes: Selectivity and the International Criminal Law Regime. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. 347 p.

32. Cwik Сhr. 2009. The other Immigration to Argentina: The Case of Adolf Eichmann. – Clío América. Vol. 3. Issue 5. P. 85-103.

33. Czaplinski W. Concepts of Jus Cogens and Obligations Erga Omnes in International Law in the Light of Recent Developments. – Polish Yearbook of International Law. 1999. Vol. 23. P. 87-97.

34. Detter I. The Law of War. 3rd ed. – London; New York: Routledge. 2016. 568 p.

35. De Vet E. Invoking Obligations Erga Omnes in the Twenty-First Century: Progressive Developments since Barcelona Traction. – South African Yearbook of International Law. 2013. Vol. 38. P. 1-19

36. Dinstein Y. The Universality Principle and War Crimes. – International Law Studies. 1998. Vol. 71. P. 17-37.

37. Douglas L. The Memory of Judgment: Making Law and History in the Trials of the Holocaust. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. 2011. 318 p.

38. Drumbl M. Victims who Victimise. – London Review of International Law. 2016. Vol. 4. Issue 2. P. 217-247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/lril/lrw015

39. Feldestein A. Ben-Gurion, Zionism and American Jewry: 1948-1963. London: Routledge. 2006. 240 p.

40. Ferdinandusse W.N. Direct Application of International Criminal Law in National Courts. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press. 2006. 338 p.

41. Forlati S. Azioni dinanzi alla Corte internazionale di guistizia rispetto a violazioni di obblighi erga omnes. – Rivista di diritto internazionale. 2001. No. 1. P. 69-109.

42. Fournet C. The Crime of Destruction and the Law of Genocide: Their Impact on Collective Memory. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing. 2007. 175 p.

43. Fox F. The Pinochet Case No. 3. – The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 1999. Vol. 48. Issue 3. P. 687-702.

44. Friedman J. Arendt in Jerusalem, Jackson at Nuremberg: Presuppositions of the Nazi War Crimes Trials. – Israel Law Review. 1994. Vol. 28. Issue 4. P. 601-625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223700011778

45. Frilling T. A. Jewish Kapo in Auschwitz: History, Memory, and the Politics of Survivor. Waltham: Brandeis University Press. 2014. 340 p.

46. Garrod M. The Protective Principle of Jurisdiction Over War Crimes and Hollow Concept of Universality. – International Criminal Law Review. 2012. Vol. 12. No. 5. P. 763-826.

47. Glotova S. V. Prestupleniya protiv chelovechnosti: genezis i sovremennoe ponimanie kontseptsii [Crimes against Humanity: genesis and modern general international law]. – Zhurnal zarubezhnogo i sravnitel'nogo zakonodatel'stva. 2016. No. 3. P. 101-109. (In Russ.)

48. Grabenwater C. European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms: Commentary. Oxford; Portland: C.H. Beck; Nomos; Hart. 2014. 600 p.

49. Green L. The Eichmann Case. – Modern Law Review. 1960. Vol. 23. P. 507-515.

50. Green L. The Maxim Nullum Crimen Sine Lege and the Eichmann Trial. – British Yearbook of International Law 1963. Vol. 38. P. 457-471.

51. Hall C. K. Universal Jurisdiction: New Uses for an Old Tool. – Justice for Crimes against Humanity. Ed. by M. Lattimer and P. Sands. Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing. 2006. P. 47-72.

52. Hall C. K. Contemporary Universal Jurisdiction.- Human Rights and Criminal Justice for Downtrodden: Essaye in Honour of Asbjorn Eide.- Ed. by M. Bergsmo. Leiden/Boston: Martinuss Nijhoff Publishers. 2003. P. 111-138.

53. Harel I. The House on Garibaldi Street. London: Routledge. 1975. 287 p.

54. Harris D. J. Cases and Materials on International Law. London: Sweet&Maxwell. 1998. 779 p.

55. Hierarchy in International Law: The Place of Human Rights. Ed. by E. de Wet, J. Vidmar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2012. 330 p. DOI: DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199647071.001.0001

56. Human Rights and Criminal Justice for the Downtrodden: Essays in Honour of Asbjørn Eide. Ed. by M. Bergsmo. Leiden;Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. 2003. 825 p.

57. Inazumi M. Universal Jurisdiction in Modern International Law. Utrecht: Intersentia. 2005. 274 p.

58. Iraola R. Jurisdiction, Treaties, and Due Process. – Buffalo Law Review. 2011. Vol. 59. No. 3. P. 693-714.

59. Ireland-Piper D. Accountability in Extraterritoriality: A Comparative and International Law Perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. 2017. 208 p.

60. Jaspers K. Who Should Have Tried Eichmann? - Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2006. Vol. 4. No. 4. 853-858.

61. Jockusch L. Prosecuting “Crimes against Jewish People”: The Eichmann Trial and the History of a Legal Concept. – Eichmann Trial Reconsidered. Ed. by R. Wittmann. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 2021. P. 75-103.

62. Kelsen H. Collective and Individual Responsibility in International Law with Particular Regard to Punishment of War Criminals. – California Law Review. 1943. Vol. 31. No. 5. P. 530-571.

63. Kelsen H. General Theory of State and Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1945. 516 p.

64. Keren M. Ben-Gurion’s Theory of Sovereignty: The Trial of Adolf Eichmann. – David Ben-Gurion: Politics and Leadership in Israel. Ed. by R.W. Zweig. New York: Routledge. 1991. P. 38-51.

65. Kittichaisaree K. The Obligation to Extradite or Prosecute. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2018. 400 p.

66. Kittrie N. A Post Mortem of the Eichmann Case - The Lessons for International Law. – Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. 1964. Vol. 55. No.1. P. 16-28.

67. Kolb R. Théorie du Jus Cogens International. – Revue Belge de Droit Internationale. 2003. Vol. 36. No. 1. P. 5-55.

68. Koskenniemi M. Between Impunity and Show Trial. – Max Planck Yearbook of UN Law. 2002. Vol. 6. P. 1-21.

69. Kovac M.A. Apprehension of War Crimes Indictees: Should the United Nations' Courts Outsource Private Actors to Catch Them?. – Catholic University Law Review. 2002. Vol. 51. No. 2. P. 619-653.

70. Kress С. Universal Jurisdiction over International Crimes and the Institute de droit International. – Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2006. Vol. 4. No. 3. P. 561–585.

71. Lagerwall A. Le principe ex injuria jus non obitur en droit international. Bruxelles: Bruylant. 2016. 634 p.

72. Landis K.T. The Seizure of Noriega: A challenge Ker-Frisbie Doctrine. – American University International Law and Policy Journal. 1991. Vol. 6. Issue 4. P. 571-607.

73. Landsman S. The Eichmann Case and the Invention of the Witness-Driven Atrocity Trial. – Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. 2012. Vol. 51. No. 1. P. 77-87.

74. Lasok D. The Eichmann Trial. – International & Comparative Law Quarterly. 1962. Vol. 11. Issue 2. P. 355- 374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/11.2.355

75. Lepard B. Customary International law: A New Theory with Practical Application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2010. 440 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804717

76. Linton S. 2009. The Role of Judges in Dealing with the Legacies of the Past. - The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence. 2009. Vol. I. New York: Oceana. P. 203-248.

77. Lippert D. The Eichmann Case and the Nuremberg Trials. – American Bar Association Journal. 1962. Vol. 48. No. 8. P. 738-741.

78. Lippman M. Genocide: The Trial of Adolf Eichmann and the Quest for Global Justice. – Buffalo Human Rights Law Review. 2002. Vol. 8. P. 45-121.

79. Liskofsky S. The Eichmann Case. – The American Jewish Year Book. 1961. Vol. 62. P. 199-208.

80. Longerich P. Holocaust: The Nazi Persecution and Murder of the Jews. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2010. 645 p.

81. Macoto S. Expanding the Scope of Universal Jurisdiction through Municipal Law: From Piracy to the Crime of Aggression via Eichmann Trial. – Historical Origins of International Criminal Law: Vol. 4. Ed. by M. Bergsmo [et. al.] Oslo: Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher. 2015. P. 339-366.

82. Mann I. 2010. The Dual Foundation of Universal Jurisdiction: Towards a Jurisprudence for the “Court of Critique”. – Transnational Legal Theory. Vol. 1. Issue 4. P. 485-521.

83. Maogoto J. The Work of National Military Tribunals under Control Council Law 10. – The Legal Regime of the International Criminal Court: Essays in Honour of Professor Igor Blishchenko. Ed. by J. Doria, H.-P. Gasser, C. Basiouni. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. 2009. P. 51-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004163089.i-1122.21

84. Minerbi S. The Eichmann Trial Diary: A Chronicle of the Holocaust. New York : Enigma Books. 2011. 256 p.

85. Mitsilegas V. Article 49 – Principle of Legality and Proportionality of Criminal Offences and Penalties. – The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary. Ed. by S. Peers [et al.]. Oxford; Portland: BECK-Hart-Nomos.2014. P. 1394-1415.

86. Mohit A. The Customary Law of International Abductions: Limits and Boundaries. – Asian Yearbook of International Law. 2006. Vol. 11. P. 123-146.

87. Mulish H. Criminal case 40/61, the of Adolf Eichmann: an Eyewitness Account. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 2009. 208 p.

88. Musmanno M. The Eichmann Kommandos. Philadelphia : Macrae Smith. 1961. 288 p.

89. Mystris D. An African Union’s Rethinking of International Criminal Justice. Leiden; Boston: Brill Nijhoff. 2021. 328 p.

90. O’Keefe R. International Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2015. 678 p.

91. Orakhelashvili A. Peremptory Norms and reparation for Internationally Wrongful Acts. – Baltic Yearbook of International Law. 2003. Vol. 3. P. 19-56.

92. Orakhelashvili A. Peremptory Norms in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2008. 660 p.

93. Orakhelashvili A. Audience and Authority – The Merit of Doctrine. – Netherlands Yearbook of International Law. 2015. Vol. 46. P. 115-145.

94. O’Sullivan A. Universal Jurisdiction in İnternational Criminal Law: The Debate and Battle foe Hegemony. London;New York: Routledge. 2017. 234 p.

95. Parvikko T. Positivists Versus Moralists: The Eichmann Trial and International Law. – Finnish Yearbook of Political Thought. 2000. Vol. 4. P. 223–50. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7227/R.4.1.11

96. Paulussen C. Male Captus Bene Detentus? Surrendering Suspects to the International Criminal Court. Antwerp: Intersentia. 2010. 1195 p.

97. Pearlman M. The Capture and Trial of Adolf Eichmann. New York: Simon and Schuster. 1963. 666 p.

98. Powderly J. The Trials of Eichmann, Barbie and Finta. – Routledge Handbook of International Criminal Law. Ed. by W. Schabas, N. Bernaz. London; New York: Routledge. 2011. P.33-50.

99. Pusse H. The Relationship between International Humanitarian Law and International Criminal Tribunals. – International Review of the Red Cross. 2006. Vol. 88. No. 861. P. 65-86.

100. Ragazzi M. The Concept of International Obligations Erga Omnes. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1997. 264 p.

101. Randall K. Universal Jurisdiction under International Law. – Texas Law Review. 1998. Vol. 66. P. 785-810.

102. Reiss R. H. The Extradition of John Demjanjuk: War Crimes, Universality Jurisdiction, and the Political Offence Doctrine. – Cornell International Law Journal. 1987. Vol. 20. Issue 2. P. 281-315.

103. Reydams L. Universal Jurisdiction: International and Municipal Legal Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2004. 286 p. DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274260.001.0001

104. Roht-Arriaza N. The Pinochet Precedent and Universal Jurisdiction. – New England Law Review. 2001. Vol. 35. No. 2. P. 311-319.

105. Rosenbaum E.M. The Eichmann Case and the Distortion of History. – Loyola of Los Angeles International & Comparative Law Review. 2012. Vol. 34. P.387-400.

106. Ryngaert C. Jurisdiction in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2015. 262 p.

107. Safarov N.A. Ekstraditsiya v mezhdunarodnom ugolovnom prave: problemy teorii i praktiki [Extradition in International Criminal Law: problems of theory and practice] Moscow: Wolters Kluwer. 2005. 415 p. (In Russ.)

108. Safarov N.A. Nasil'stvennoe pokhishchenie obvinyaemykh: teoriya i praktika zapadnoi yurisprudentsii [Forced Abduction: theory and practice of western jurisprudence]. – Rossiiskii ezhegodnik ugolovnogo prava [Russian Yearbook of Criminal Law]. 2006. No. 1. P. 392-410. (In Russ.)

109. Safarov N.A. Presledovanie mezhdunarodnykh prestuplenii: universal'naya yurisdiktsiya protiv diplomaticheskogo immuniteta [Prosecution of International Crimes: Universal Jurisdiction versus Diplomatic Immunity]. – Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2011. N 9. P. 81-92. (In Russ.)

110. Schabas W. Retroactive Application of Genocide Convention. – University of St. Thomas Journal of Law and Policy. 2010. Vol. 4. N 2. P. 36-59.

111. Schabas W. Unimaginable Atrocities: Justice, Politics, and Rights at the War Crimes Tribunals. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2012. 240 p. DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199653072.001.0001

112. Schabas W. The European Convention on Human Rights: A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2015. 1308 p.

113. Scharf M. Customary International Law in Times of Fundamental Change: Recognizing Croatian Moments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2013. 228 p.

114. Schwabach A., Patchett S.A. Doctrine or Dictum: The KerFrisbie Doctrine and Official Abductions which Breach International Law. – University of Miami Inter-American Law Review. 1993. Vol. 25. No. 4. P. 20-56.

115. Schwarzenberger G. The Eichmann Judgment: An Essay in Censorial Jurisprudence. – Current Legal Problems. 1962. Vol. 15. Issue 1. P. 248–265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/15.1.248

116. Sclütter B. Developments in Customary International Law: Theory and the Practice of the International Court of Justice and the International ad hoc Criminal Tribunals for Rwanda and Yugoslavia. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. 2010. 370 p.

117. Shani Y. The Road to the Genocide Convention and Beyond. - The UN Genocide Convention: A Commentary. Ed. by P. Gaeta. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2009. P. 3-26.

118. Simentić J. To exclude or not to exclude, that is the question. Developments regarding bases for exclusion from refugee status in the EU. – German Law Journal. 2019. Vol. 20 . Issue 1. P. 111-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2019.5

119. Singer I. Reductio ad Absurdum: The Kapo Trial Judgments’ Contribution to International Criminal Jurisprudence and Customary International Law. – Criminal Law Forum. 2013. Vol. 24. No. 3. P. 235-258.

120. Söyler Y. Barcelona Traction davası ve uluslararası hukuka etkisi. – Gazi Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi. 2015. Vol. XIX. P. 207-247.

121. Staker K. Jurisdiction. – International Law. Ed. by M. Evans. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2014. P. 289-315.

122. Straschnov A. The Judicial System in Israel. - Tulsa Law Journal. 1999. Vol. 34. P.527-535.

123. Tams C. Enforcing Obligations Erga Omnes in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2005. 424 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511494116

124. Tams C., Tzanakopoulos A. Barcelona Traction at 40: The ICJ as an Agent of Legal Development. – Leiden Journal of International Law. 2010. Vol. 33. Issue 4. P. 781-800. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156510000361

125. Tanaka Y. The Legal Consequences of Obligation Erga Omnes in International Law. – Netherlands International Law Review. 2021. Vol. 68. No.1. P. 1-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-021-00184-9

126. Tan Y. The Rome Statute as Evidence of Customary International Law. Leiden; Boston: Brill Nijhoff. 2021. 488 p.

127. The 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of refugees and Its 1967 Protocols: A Commentary. Ed. by A. Zimmermann. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2011. 1675 p. DOI: 10.1093/actrade/9780199542512.001.0001

128. The Arc of Due Process in American Constitutional Law. Ed. by E.T. Sullivan, T.M. Masarro. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2013. 272 p.

129. The Law of War Crimes: National and International Approaches. Ed. by T. MacCormack, G. Simpson. The Hague: Kluwer Law International. 1997. 254 p.

130. The Nuremberg Trial and International Law. Ed. by G. Ginsburgs, V.N. Kudriavtsev. Dodrecht; Boston;London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. 1990. 288 p

131. The Oxford Companion to International Criminal Justice. Ed. by A. Cassese. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2009. 1096 p.

132. The Travaux Préparatoires of the Crime of Aggression. Ed. by S. Barriga, C. Kress and L. Grover. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2012. 835 p.

133. The United Nations Principles to Combat Impunity: A Commentary. Ed. by F. Haldemann, T. Unger. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2018. 471 p. DOI: 10.1093/law/9780198743606.001.0001

134. Thirlway H. The Sources of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2014. 272 p.

135. Tomuschat C. The Legacy of Nuremberg. – Journal of International Criminal Justice. 2006. Vol. 4. N 4. P. 830-844. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mql051

136. Trunk I. Judenrat: The Jewish Council in Eastern Europe Under Nazi Occupation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.1972. 663 p.

137. Ukabiala N., Pickard D., Yamamoto A. Erga Omnes Partes before the International Court of Justice: From Standing to the Judgment on the Merits. – ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law. 2021. Vol. 27. Issue 2. P. 234-250.

138. Universal Jurisdiction and the Prosecution of Serious Crimes under International Law. Ed. by S. Macedo. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press. 2004. 392 p.

139. Urs P. Obligations Erga Omnes and the Question Standing before the International Court of Justice. – Leiden Journal of International Law. 2021. Vol. 34. Issue 2. P. 505-525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156521000091

140. Van Siedregt E. Individual Criminal Responsibility in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2012. 330 p. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199560363.001.0001

141. Vlasic M., De Sousa J. P. The Use of Force by Private Parties against Suspect Pirates. – Prosecuting Maritime Piracy: Domestic Solution to International Crimes. Ed. by M. Scharf, M. Newton, M. Sterio. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2015. P. 119-149.

142. Webb P.House of Lords, Judgment, R. v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, Ex Parte Pinochet Ugarte (Amnesty International Intervening) (No 3), 1999. - British Contribution to International Law (1915-2015). Ed. by J. Barrett, J.-P. Gauci. Leiden; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. 2020. P. 1539-1560.

143. Wenig J.M. 1997. Enforcing the Lessons of History: Israel Judges the Holocaust. – The Law of War Crimes: National and International Approaches. The Hague/Boston/London: Kluwer Law International. P. 103-122.

144. Weitz Y. In the Name of Six Million Accusers: Gideon Hausner as Attorney General and His Place in the Eichmann Trial. – Israel Studies. 2009. Vol. 14. No. 2. P. 26-49.

145. Wilson R. A History of the Role of Defense Counsel in International Criminal and War Crimes Tribunals. – Defenses in International Criminal Proceedings. Ed. by M. Bohlander, R. Boed, R. Wilson. New York: Transnational Publishers. 2006. Р. 31-66.

146. Woodhouse D. The Pinochet Case: A Legal and Constitutional Analysis. Oxford: Hart Publishing. 2000. 304 p.

147. Wright Q. The Law of the Nuremberg Trial. – American Journal of International Law. 1947. Vol. 41. Issue 1. P. 38 – 72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2193853

148. Yablonka H., Tlamim M. The Development of Holocaust Consciousness in Israel: The Nuremberg, Kapos, Kastner, and Eichmann Trial. – Israel Studies. 2003. Vol. 8. No. 3. Р. 1-24.

149. Zvyagintsev A. G. Nyurnbergskii nabat: reportazh iz proshlogo, obrashchenie k budushchemu [Nuremberg alarm: reportage from the past, looking to the future]. Moscow: OLMA Media Grup Publ. 2006. 1120 p. (In Russ.)