Some International Law Aspects of Safety of Civil Aircraft Flying over the Areas of Armed Conflicts and Military Exercises
https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2018-2-58-70
Abstract
Introduction. Despite the international aviation community’s attempts aimed at improvement of safety of air transport and reduction of the number of air accidents, unfortunately, many threats to safety of civil aircraft still exist to date, including armed conflicts and other military activities taking place in different parts of our planet. Malaysian Boeing 777-200 crash of 17 July 2014 in the eastern Ukraine killing 283 passengers and 15 crew members has become the tragedy clearly showing the risks, to which the civil aircraft and passengers on board flying in the airspace over the areas of armed conflicts, are exposed. In light of this accident, the author examines the present international legal regime of safety of civil aircraft flying over the areas of armed conflicts and military exercises, identifies the problems of this regime and proposes the ways of its improvement.
Materials and methods. The present research has been conducted on the basis of international air law treaties, the documents of International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), as well as the works of Russian and foreign international law experts. The methodology of the research is based upon general scientific and special methods, including dialectical method, methods of analysis and synthesis, deduction and induction, comparative legal method.
Research results. On the basis of his research the author concludes that neither the present-day international legal regime of safety of civil aircraft flying over the areas of armed conflicts and military exercises, nor existing rules of international air law prohibiting use of weapons against civil aircraft can prevent accidents similar to Malaysian airplane crash of 17 July 2014. In view of this conclusion, the author proposes improvement of international legal regime of safety of civil aviation, and in particular, amendment of the Convention on International Civil Aviation of 1944 (“Chicago Convention of 1944”) aimed at enhancement of States’ obligations relating to restriction of flights of civil aircraft within their sovereign airspace during armed conflicts or other military activities.
Discussion and conclusions. The author examines treaty and customary rules of international law governing the issues of safety of civil aircraft flying over the areas of armed conflicts and military exercises as well as ICAO standards and other acts (documents) and concludes that they do not precisely oblige the States to restrict or prohibit flights of civil aircraft in their sovereign airspace during armed conflicts, military exercises or other hazardous military activities. Moreover, the provisions of the Chicago Convention of 1944 and other international treaties prohibiting the use of weapons against civil aircraft are imperfect and do not fully protect civil aviation from different types of weapons. Therefore, the ICAO’s work following Malaysian airplane crash of 17 July 2014 for the purpose of enhancement of protection of civil aviation from the threats arising from armed conflicts and other hazardous military activities appears insufficient and must include more efficient measures, such as adoption of new international treaty rules containing precise States’ obligations.
About the Author
A. A. BatalovRussian Federation
Alexander A. Batalov - Cand. Sci. (Law), LL.M. in International Air and Space Law Leiden University ICAO.
3617, Avenue du Musée, Montreal, H3G 2E1References
1. Abeyratne R. Rulemaking in Air Transport: A Deconstructive Analysis. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. 2016. 252 p. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-44657-8
2. Abeyratne R. Civil Air Transport over Conflict Zones – ICAO’s Role in Risk Management. – Zeitschrift für Luft und Weltraumrecht. 2015. No. 1. P. 18–29.
3. Abeyratne R. Convention on International Civil Aviation. A Commentary. Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing. 2014. 737 p. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-00068-8
4. Antwerpen N. van. Cross-Border Provision of Air Navigation Services with Specific Reference to Europe. Safeguarding Transparent Lines of Responsibility and Liability. The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International. 2008. 276 p.
5. Buergenthal T. Law-Making in the International Civil Aviation Organization. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press. 247 p.
6. Chernichenko S.V. Kontury mezhdunarodnogo prava [Contours of International Law]. Moscow: Nauchnaya kniga Publ. 2014. 592 p. (In Russ.)
7. De Hoon M. Navigating the Legal Horizon: Lawyering the MH17 Disaster. – Utrecht Journal of In ternational and European Law. 2017. No. 33(84). P. 90–119.
8. Dempsey P.S. Public International Air Law. Montreal: Centre for Research in Air and Space Law. 2008. 878 p.
9. Gibney M. The Downing of MH17: Russian Responsibility? – Human Rights Law Review. 2015. No. 15. P. 169–178.
10. Huang J. Aviation Safety through the Rule of Law. ICAO’s Mechanisms and Practices. The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International. 2009. 256 p.
11. Mezhdunarodnoe vozdushnoe pravo. V 2 kn. Kn. 1. Pod red. A.N. Movchana [International Air Law. In 2 books. Book 1. Ed. by A.N. Movchan]. 1980. Moscow: Nauka Publ. 1980. 352 p. (In Russ.)
12. Milde M. Mezhdunarodnoe vozdushnoe pravo i IKAO [International Air Law and ICAO]. Saint Petersburg: Institut AEROHELP Publ. 2017. 451 p. (In Russ.)
13. Molodtsov S.V., Vylegzhanin A.N., Zilanov V.K. Anklavy otkrytogo morya i mezhdunarodnoe parvo [High Sea Areas and International Law]. – Moscow Journal of International Law. 1993. No. 3. P. 39–48. (In Russ.)
14. Naryshkin S.E. Otvety Predsedatelya Gosudarstvennoi Dumy Federal’nogo Sobraniya Rossiiskoi Federatsii S.E. Naryshkina na voprosy glavnogo redaktora Moskovskogo zhurnala mezhdunarodnogo prava [Answers of the Chairman of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation S.E. Naryshkin to the Questions of the Editor-in-chief of the Moscow Journal of International Law]. – Moscow Journal of International Law. 2015. No. 1 (97). P. 5–10. (In Russ.)
15. Ratajczyk M. Regional Aviation Safety Organizations. Enhancing Air Transport Safety through Regional Cooperation. The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International. 2015. 352 p.
16. Tunkin G.I. Teoriya mezhdunarodnogo prava [Theory of International Law]. Moscow: Zertsalo Publ. 2017. 416 p. (In Russ.)
17. Voronin E.R., Kulebyakin V.N., Nikolaev A.V. Gosudarstvennyi perevorot v Kieve v fevrale 2014 g.: mezhdunarodno-pravovye otsenki i posledstviya [The сoup d’état in Kyiv in February 2014: International Law Context and Consequences]. – Moscow Journal of International Law. 2015. No. 1 (97). P. 11–28. (In Russ.)
18. Vylegzhanin A.N., Kalamkaryan R.A. Znachenie mezhdunarodnogo obychaya v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave [The Role of International Custom in the Contemporary International Law]. – Moscow Journal of International Law. 2012. No. 2. (86). P. 5–29. (In Russ.)
19. Weber L. International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). 3rd ed. The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International. 2017. 212 p.
Review
For citations:
Batalov A.A. Some International Law Aspects of Safety of Civil Aircraft Flying over the Areas of Armed Conflicts and Military Exercises. Moscow Journal of International Law. 2018;(2):58-70. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2018-2-58-70