Preview

Moscow Journal of International Law

Advanced search

THE ACTIVITIES OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS ON THE ENSURING OF A UNIVERSAL ACCESS TO MEDICINE IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF MECHANISMS PROTECTING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2017-106-2-107-117

Abstract

Ensuring universal access to medicines is an important topic of the international agenda and national healthcare police. Access to medicines is determined by systemic interaction of a number of factors, including investment policy issues, intellectual
property protection, trade processes, and implementation of state guarantees in free medical care. There are clear imbalances in the provision of adequate level of investment in medicines development, acceptable price formation and ensuring a sufficient level of intellectual property rights protection. Effective regulation of these processes requires expanding the scope of cooperation between international
organizations and strengthening the mandate of the World Health Organization to form an international agenda in access to medicines, which will take into account the interests of producers and society. The authors, based on the analysis of the specifics of the pharmaceutical industry development and the level of innovative medicines availability in various regions of the world, came to the conclusion that at the current stage, the initiatives implemented by international organizations do not have a proper balance between the interests of the society and pharmaceutical producers. The authors defined that unified standards of intellectual property rights protection can guarantee the possibility for companies to maintain a high level of funding of R&D to recover economic losses due to investments that do not lead to the creation of a market product. The authors also found that international legal documents establish general principles of regulation that determine the need to refer to the most successful practices, implemented at the national level to ensure a balanced approach to stimulate the development of innovations and expand the coverage of the population with the essential drugs.

About the Authors

A. Kh. ABASHIDZE
People’s Friendship University of Russia (RUDN-University)
Russian Federation
Doctor of Juridical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department, Department of International Law


V. S. MALICHENKO
People’s Friendship University of Russia (RUDN-University)
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Law)


References

1. Abashidze A.Kh., Malichenko V.S. Problemy mezhdunarodno-pravovoi kvalifikatsii narushenii prav cheloveka farmatsevticheskimi kompaniyami [The International Legal Responsibility of Pharmaceutical Companies for Human Rights Violations]. – Moscow Journal of International Law. 2014. №2 (94). P. 4-20. (in. Russ.)

2. Competitiveness of the EU market and industry for pharmaceuticals. Volume II: Markets, Innovation & Regulation. 2009. 112 p. URL: http://www.pedz.uni-mannheim.de/daten/edz-h/gdb/09/vol_2_markets_innovation_regulation_en.pdf (accessed date: 19.04.2017).

3. Correa C.M. Implementation of the WTO General Council Decision on Paragraph 6 of the DOHA Declaration on the Trips Agreement and Public Health. 2004. 49 p. URL: http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/pdf/s6159e/s6159e.pdf (accessed date: 19.04.2017).

4. DiMasi J.A., Grabowski H.G. The Cost of Biopharmaceutical R&D: Is Biotech Different?. - Managerial and Decision Economics. 2007. Vol. 28. Issue 4–5. P. 469–479. DOI: 10.1002/mde.1360

5. DiMasi J.A., Hansen R.W., Grabowski H.G. The Price of Innovation: New Estimates of Drug Development Costs. - Journal of Health Economics. 2003. Vol. 22. Issue 2. P. 151–185.

6. Dutfield G. Intellectual Property Rights and the life science industries: A Twentieth Century History. London, New-York: Routledge. 2003. 304 p.

7. Fink C., Reichenmiller P. Tightening TRIPS: the intellectual property provisions of recent US free trade agreements. 2005. 11 p. URL: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/173901468140377145/pdf/321110TradeNote20.pdf (accessed date: 19.04.2017).

8. Guzman A.T. Global governance and the WTO. – Harvard International Law Journal. 2004. Vol. 45. № 2. P. 303-352.

9. Public health, innovation and intellectual property rights: report of the Commission on Intellectual Property Rights, Innovation and Public Health. 2006. 205 p. URL: http://www.who.int/intellectualproperty/documents/thereport/ENPublicHealthReport.pdf. (accessed date: 19.04.2017).

10. Velasquez G., Boulet P. Globalization and Access to Drugs: Perspectives on the WTO/TRIPS Agreement. 1999. 105 p. URL: http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/pdf/whozip35e/whozip35e.pdf (accessed date: 19.04.2017).


Review

For citations:


ABASHIDZE A.Kh., MALICHENKO V.S. THE ACTIVITIES OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS ON THE ENSURING OF A UNIVERSAL ACCESS TO MEDICINE IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF MECHANISMS PROTECTING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS. Moscow Journal of International Law. 2017;106(2):107-117. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2017-106-2-107-117

Views: 702


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0869-0049 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0893 (Online)