THE IMPACT OF HUMAN RIGHTS LAW ON THE PROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT OF CONTEMPORARY INTERNATIONAL LAW. PART I

Human rights law has had a powerful influence on general international law. It sets the vector of the progressive development of general international law for decades to come. Under its influence the international community began to perceive and states began to implement national sovereignty in other way and the person acquired many characteristics of international personality. Classical international law began to emerge as the global law largely due to the fact that Human rights law is the right of result, and also due to non-state, including international judicial, rulemaking, that has assigned to Human rights law self-development and constant adaptation to the changing needs of social and moral evolution of society. However, at some point, some states has ceased to encourage the international judicial activism, for example, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, the countries of Eastern Europe and, last but not least, the Russian Federation. Now international judicial rulemaking is accused of limiting freedom of national discretion in struggle against the recent crisis experienced by society due to increased terrorist threats, weakening of international competitiveness, influx of illegal migrants and refugees. In addition, a number of controversial legal positions promoted by international judicial bodies also met opposition. The authors see the possibility to eliminate the growing extremely dangerous and harmful conflict between the states and international judicial bodies in strict adherence to the latest requirements of subsidiarity,
restraint, neutrality and political impartiality and in that the international judicial bodies should focus mainly on search for a reasonable and generally acceptable balance between the interests of the individual and society, the individual and the state and between individual rights of different types.

human rights law, general international law, judicial law-making, UN treaty bodies, the European Court of Human Rights, subsidiarity, the balance of rights and interests of the individual, population groups, the State and society

1. Bajaj M. Human Rights Education: Theory, Research, Praxis. Philelohia: Penn University Press. 2017.368 p.

2. Balcer A. [et al.] Polish views of the EU: the illusion of consensus. Stefan Batory Foundation. Warsaw: Stefan Batory Foundation. 2017. 18 p.

3. Bantekas I., Oette L. International Human Rights Law Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2016. 778 p.

4. Bauring B. Postanovlenie Bol’shoi palaty Evropeiskogo suda po pravam cheloveka po delu “Kononov protiv Latvii” (17 maya 2010 goda): prava li Rossiiskaya Federatsiya v svoem ponimanii sootnosheniya politiki i mezhdunarodnogo prava? [The judgment of the Grand chamber of the European court of human rights in the case “Kononov V. Latvia” (17 may 2010): Does the Russian Federation right in its understanding of the relation of politics and international law?]. - Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie [International Justice]. 2012. № 2 (3). P.75-83. (in Russ.)

5. Brysk A., Stone M. Expanding Human Rights: 21st Century Norms and Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. 2017. 296 p.

6. Chernega V. 2017. Frantsuzskii vybor [The French choice]. - Vsya Evropa [All Europe]. 2017. № 3 (119). URL: http://alleuropalux.org/?p=14396. (accessed date: 16.04.2017) (in Russ.)

7. Clapham A. Human Rights: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2015. 193 p.

8. Costigan R., Stone R. Textbook on Civil liberties & Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2017. 560 p.

9. Davis H. Human Rights Law Directions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2016. 584 p.

10. Entin M. L. Mezhdunarodnye garantii prav cheloveka: opyt Soveta Evropy [International guarantees of human rights: the experience of the Council of Europe]. Moscow: :Izd-vo MNIMP Publ. 1997b. 296 p. (in Russ.)

11. Entin M. L. Politiko-pravovye posledstviya vstupleniya Rossii v Sovet Evropy [Political and Legal Consequences of the Russian Membership in the Council of Europe]. – Moscow Journal of International law. 1996. № 3. P. 97-110. (in Russ.)

12. Entin M.L. Glavnye otlichitel’nye osobennosti Evropeiskoi sistemy zashchity prav cheloveka [The main distinctive features of the European system for the protection of human rights]. – Moscow Journal of International Law. 2004a. № 3. P. 101-115. (in Russ.)

13. Entin M.L. Dostup k pravosudiyu [Access to Justice]. - Rossiiskaya yustitsiya [Russian Justice]. 1997a. № 6. P.2-6. (in Russ.)

14. Entin M.L. Mezhdunarodnoe prinuzhdenie k soblyudeniyu prav cheloveka v Evrope [International coercion to respect human rights in Europe]. - Vsya Evropa [All Europe]. 2007. № 2 (8). URL: www.alleuropalux.org. (accessed date: 16.04.2017). (in Russ.)Ventura M. Pravo i religiya vne natsional’nykh granits: polozhitel’noe znachenie Evropeiskogo suda po pravam cheloveka [Law and Religion Beyond National Borders: The Virtue of the European Court of Human Rights]. - Gosudarstvo, religiya, tserkov’ v Rossii i za rubezhom [State, religion and Church in Russia and abroad]. 2013. №2 (31). P. 177-212. (in Russ.)

15. Entin M.L. Mezhgosudarstvennyi kontrol’ za ispolneniem reshenii Evropeiskogo suda po pravam cheloveka [Interstate control over the implementation of decisions of the European Court of Human Rights]. - Aktual’nye problemy mezhdunarodnogo grazhdanskogo protsessa. Pod. red. Bakhina S.V. [Actual Problems of International Civil Process. Ed. by Bakhin S.V.]. St. Petersburg: SKF “Rossiya-Neva” Publ. 2003c. P. 26-50. (in Russ.)

16. Entin M.L. Sovershenstvovanie metodov obucheniya pravam cheloveka [Improvement of human rights education methods]. - Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie [Comparative Constitutional Review]. 2004c. № 2. 115-120. (in Russ)Entin M.L. Spravedlivoe sudebnoe razbiratel’stvo po pravu Soveta Evropy i Evropeiskogo Soyuza [A fair trial according to the law of the Council of Europe and the European Union]. - Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie [Comparative Constitutional Review].2003b. № 3. P.85-87. (in Russ.)

17. Entin M.L. Zashchita i obespechenie prav cheloveka po pravu Evrosoyuza. Kurs lektsii [The protection and promotion of human rights on European Union law. A course of lectures]. Moscow: MGIMO Publ. 2003a. 126 p. (in Russ.)

18. Entin M.L. Zashchita i obespechenie prav cheloveka po pravu Evrosoyuza [The protection and promotion of human rights on European Union law]. - Lektsii po aktual’nym problemam mezhdunarodnogo i evropeiskogo prava. Otv. red. Entin M.L., Galenskaya L.N. [Lectures on actual problems of international and European law. Ed. by L.M. Entin, L.N. Galenskaya]. St. Petersburg.: SKF “Rossiya-Neva” Publ. 2004b. P. 156-251. (in Russ.)

19. Harris D., O’Boil M., Uorbrik K. 2016. Pravo Evropeiskoi konventsii po pravam cheloveka [The law of the European Convention on Human Rights]. Moscow: Razvitie pravovykh sistem Publ. 1432 p. (in Russ.)

20. Hehir A., Murray R.W. Protecting Human Rights in the 21st Century. New York: Routledge. 2017. 278 p.

21. Hijmans H. European Union as Guardian of Internet Privacy. The Story of Art 16 TFEU. Brusseles : Springer. 2016. 604 p.

22. Ispolinov A. Ispolnenie reshenii mezhdunarodnykh sudov: teoriya i praktika [Execution of decisions of international courts: theory and practice. International law]. - Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie [International Justice]. 2017. №1. P. 45-67. (in Russ.)

23. Joppke C. The Secular State Under Siege: Religion and Politics in Europe and America. Cambridge: Polity Press. 2015. 240 p.

24. Kazinyan A.G.. Khartiya osnovnykh prav Evropeiskogo Soyuza [The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union]. – Moscow Journal of International Law. 2003. №1 (49). P.70-93. (in Russ.)

25. Murray A. Information Technology Law. The Law and Society. 3d. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2016. 653 p.

26. Nefedov B.I. Reguliruet li mezhdunarodnoe pravo otnosheniya s uchastiem chastnykh lits? (Chast’ 1) [Does International Law Regulate Relations with Participation of Individuals? (Part 1)]. – Moscow Journal of International Law. 2017. №1 (105). P.3-19. (in Russ.)

27. Ohlin J.D. Theoretical Boundaries of Armed Conflicts and Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2016. 418 p.

28. Rainey B., Wicks E., Ovey Cl. Jacobs, White & Ovey: The European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2017. 722 p.

29. Shelton D. The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2015. 1088 p.

30. Smith Rh. Textbook on International Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2015. 440 p.

31. Vylegzhanin A.N., Kalamkarian P.A. Znachenie mezhdunarodnogo obychaia v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave [The Role of International Custom in the Contemporary International Law]. - Moscow Journal of International Law. 2012. № 2 (86). P. 5-29 (in Russ.).