The Problem of Transnational Corporation’s Legal Personality in the International Law Doctrine
https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2009-4-206-219
Abstract
The intensifying international relations have affected changes, increase, and creation of new kinds of commercial interaction forms by multinational structures. For years, legal science have been seeking legal instruments, regulating international commercial relations. With the undergoing change and complexity of forms, subjects and objects, the international relations are not regulated neither by international law, nor national law. Thus, the problem of searching the new legal mechanisms, sufficient for legal regulation of the international relations, appears.
The American international law doctrine, in the person of Philip C. Jessup, found a theory of “transnational law”. Due to the increasing impact of international economic relations and with the growing role of transnational corporations this theory has evolved. The main conclusion of the article is that the circle of international law subjects should not be expanded arbitrarily. Mainly, it should be noticed in view of the jurists’ attempts to provide legal entities with international legal personality.
About the Author
M. R. BerandzeRussian Federation
Mikhail R. Berandze – post-graduate student of the Chair of International Law
References
1. Бахин С.В. Субправо = Sub law. СПб. 2000.
2. Броунли Я. Международное право. Книга первая. М., 1977.
3. Вельяминов Г.М. Россия и глобализация // Россия в глобальной политике. 2006. № 3. Г.
4. М. Вельяминов Международное экономическое право и процесс. М.: WoltersKluwer, 2004.
5. Карро Д., Жюйар П. Международное экономическое право: Учебник. М., Международные отношения. 2001.
6. Ковалев А.А. Международное экономическое право и правовое регулирование международной экономической деятельности. М., 2007.
7. Королев М.А. Наднациональность с точки зрения международного права // Московский журнал международного права. 1997. № 2.
8. Международная правосубъектность (некоторые вопросы теории) / Отв. ред. Д.И. Фельдман. М., 1971.
9. Тункин Г.И. Идеологическая борьба и международное право. М., 1967.
10. Шумилов В.М. Международное экономическое право в контексте глобализации мировой экономики (проблемы теории и практики): Автореф. дис. … д-ра юрид. наук. М., 2001.
11. Berger K. P. The new Law merchant and the global market place – A 21st century view of transnational commercial law. 2001.
12. Calliess, Gralf-Peter. Reflexive Transnational Law: The Privatisation of Civil Law and the Civilisation of Private Law // Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 23 (2002), Heft 2.
13. Jenks C. W. Mulrinarional Entities in the Law of Nations.//International Law in a Changing World. publ. in cooper. with the UN. 1963.
14. Philip C. Jessup. Transnational law. New Haven. 1956.
15. Transnational law in a changing society. N.Y. and London. Columbia Univ. press.//ed. by W. Friedmann, L. Henkin and O. Lissitzyn. 1972
16. W. Friedmann. The changing structure of international law. L. 1964.
Review
For citations:
Berandze M.R. The Problem of Transnational Corporation’s Legal Personality in the International Law Doctrine. Moscow Journal of International Law. 2009;(4):206-219. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2009-4-206-219