On the Commercialization of the Appropriation of Natural Resources of Celestial Bodies
https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2025-2-49-70
Abstract
INTRODUCTION. The article examines the issue of such a common word combination in the practice of communication on international “space” platforms as “space resources”, which, without proper consideration of the vocabulary and terminology base of current international law, was introduced into vocabulary circulation there as a result of borrowing and uncritical use of part of the name of the informal Hague International Space Resources Governance Working Group, created in 2014. Another issue under study is how, outside the framework of international treaty and customary law, the issue of granting legal entities and individuals the right to appropriate natural resources of celestial bodies (NRCB) is resolved under the pretext of commercializing space activities.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. The materials for the study are the international space law (ISL) treaties, the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 1969, the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea of 1982, reports of the UN Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS), as well as its Legal Subcommittee (LSC), statements of some delegations at their sessions, works of Russian and foreign scientists, regulatory acts and documents of the USA, New Zealand, the Hague International Space Resources Governance Working Group. Carrying out a comparative analysis of regulatory acts and documents of the named states and group, as well as some provisions of international treaties (taking into account their conceptual, vocabulary and terminological content), the author uses the general scientific method of cognition.
RESEARCH RESULTS. The current increase in interest to the issue of the development of the NRCB has revealed the need to clarify the international legal basis for this concept for its use in further possible practical and international legal actions of the global space community aimed at solving problems associated with development of outer space. The article examines the relationship between the concept of NRCB, the terms natural resources and minerals used in international law, and the American term space resource. The use of the first concept and the last term to regulate legal relations in space outside the limits of state supremacy makes it necessary to clarify what outer space is from the point of view of the current ISL.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS. According to the norms of the current customary and treaty ISL, states only have the right to dispose (for scientific purposes) samples of mineral and other substances of celestial bodies that, in essence, represent NRCB. Assessing the currently existing international legal basis for the development of the NRCB, it can be noted that the offensive implementation of the commercialization of their appropriation is carried out with an artificially created stagnation in the development of the ISL and simultaneous attempts to use the norms of national legislation outside the territorial supremacy of states in order to create a new norm of international customary law there. The ultimate beneficiary of these norms will be global financial structures, for whose interests are commercialized space activities.
Keywords
About the Author
A. M. OreshenkovRussian Federation
Alexander M. Oreshenkov, Candidate of Law Sciences, Retired counsello
r 44, Mitinskaya St., Moscow, 125430
References
1. Abashidze A.H., Chernyh I.A. Politika i zakonodatel'stvo SShA v oblasti osvoenija prirodnyh resursov nebesnyh tel (mezhdunarodno-pravovye aspekty) [US policy and legislation in the field of development of natural resources of celestial bodies (international legal aspects)]. – Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo – 1 [Bulletin of Saint Petersburg University. Law –1]. 2022. P. 158-180. (In Russ.)
2. Berkman P.A., Vylegzhanin A.N., Modjui Zh-K., Juzbashyan M.R. Mezhdunarodnoe kosmicheskoe pravo: obshhie dlja Rossii i SShA vyzovy i perspektivy [International space law: challenges and prospects common to Russia and the United States]. – Moskovskij zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava [Moscow Journal of International Law]. 2018. No 1. P. 16-34.
3. Blazheev V.V., Jastrebova O.A., Tolstopjatenko G.P. Pravo i kosmos v jepohu global'nyh social'nyh i jekonomicheskih izmenenij [Law and space in the era of global social and economic change]. Moscow: Prospekt. 2021. 200 p. (In Russ.)
4. Filimonova A.I. Investitsionnye giganty SShA Vanguard Group i BlackRock na puti ustanovlenija global'noj monopolii [US investment giants Vanguard Group and BlackRock on path to establishing global oligopoly.] – Uchenyj sovet. [Academic Council]. 2022. No.7. (In Russ.)
5. Goswami N. Japan Is Changing the Game for Space Powers. – Magazine for the Asia-Pacific region “Diplomat”. URL: https://thediplomat.com/2023/01/japan-is-changingthe-game-for-space-powers/ (accessed date: 12.03.2025).
6. Yuzbashyan M.R. Zakon SShA ob issledovanii i ispol'zovanii kosmicheskih resursov 2015 g. i mezhdunarodnoe kosmicheskoe pravo [The US Space Resource Exploration and Utilization Act of 2015 and the International Space Law.]. – Moskovskij zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava [Moscow Journal of International Law]. 2017. No. 2 (106). P. 71-86. (In Russ.)
7. Krylov A.M. Sravnitel'nyj analiz finansirovanija grazhdanskih kosmicheskih programm Rossii, Kitaja, Indii I SShA [Comparative analysis of funding for civil space programs in Russia, China, India and the USA]. – Elektronnyj zhurnal “Tehnologii i sredstva svjazi” Spetsial'nyj vypusk “Sputnikovaja svjaz' i vestshanie” [Electronic journal “Technologies and means of communication” Special issue “Satellite communications and broadcasting”]. 2012. URL: http://lib.tssonline.ru/articles2/sputnik/sravnitelniianaliz-finansirovaniya (data obrashhenija: 12.03.2025). (In Russ.)
8. Loginov E.L., Loginov. A.E. Kosmos kak strategicheskij prioritet v bor'be za mirovoe ekonomicheskoe liderstvo v XXI veke [Outer Space as a Strategic Priority in the Struggle for Global Economic Leadership in the 21st Century]. – Natsional'nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost' [National interests: priorities and security]. 2010. No. 25 (82). P. 52-61. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kosmos-kakstrategicheskiy-prioritet-v-borbe-za-mirovoe-ekonomicheskoe-liderstvo-v-xxi-veke/viewer (data obrashhenija: 12.03.2025). (In Russ.)
9. Oreshenkov A.M. Teoreticheskie osnovy mezhdunarodno-pravovogo aspekta udalenija “kosmicheskogo musora” [Theoretical Basis of International Legal Aspect of “Space Debris” Removal]. – Moskovskij zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava [Moscow Journal of International Law]. 2024. No 2. P. 46-64. (In Russ.)
10. Oreshenkov A.M. Status Mezhagentskogo koordinatsionnogo komiteta po kosmicheskomu musoru kak mezhdunarodnoj struktury [Status of the Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee as an International Structure]. – Predstavitel'naja vlast' XXI vek. [Representative Power – XXI Century]. 2024. No. 7-8. P. 51-58. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=74512825 (data obrashhenija: 12.03.2025). (In Russ.).
11. Popova E.V. Rol' kosmicheskih issledovanij i astronomii v razvitii obstchestva [The role of space exploration and astronomy in the development of society]. – Ekonomicheskie strategii [Economic strategies]. No. 3-2009. Р. 48-52. (In Russ.)
12. Serov M.V., Stshikanov A.Ju. Perspektiva pilotiruemoj kosmonavtiki v istoricheskom masshtabe: opyt prognoza [The Prospect of Manned Spaceflight on a Historical Scale: An Experiment in Forecasting]. – Izborskij klub [Izborsk Club]. 2021. No. 1-2 (87-88). P. 144-149. (In Russ.)
13. Shaw K.L., Whitmore D.P. Mining in the United States: overview. Thomson Reuters – Practical Law. URL: https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/w-019-3805?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc. Default)&firstPage=true#co_anchor_a379024 (accessed date: 12.06.2023).
14. Volynskaja O.A. Mezhdunarodnye politico-pravovye aspekty ispol'zovanija kosmicheskih resursov. [International political and legal aspects of the use of space resources]. – Zhurnal rossijskogo prava [Journal of Russian Law]. 2018. No. 9. Р. 145-153. (In Russ.)
15. Vylegzhanin A., Yuzbashyan M., Alekseev M. Mezhdunarodno-pravovaya kosmicheskaya politika SShA: priglashenie k utochneniyu statusa prirodnyh resursov nebesnyh tel ili vyzov bol'shinstvu gosudarstv? [International Legal Outer Space Policy of the United States of America]. – Mezhdunarodnye protsessy [International processes]. 2023. No. 21 (3). P. 6-30. (In Russ.)
16. Zharkova O.A. Organizacionno-pravovoj mehanizm zashhity morskoj sredy ot zagrjaznenija s sudov [The organizational and legal mechanism for protecting the marine environment from pollution from ships]. – Izvestija vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Pravovedenie [News of higher educational institutions. Legal studies]. 1996. No. 2. P. 89-93. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Oreshenkov A.M. On the Commercialization of the Appropriation of Natural Resources of Celestial Bodies. Moscow Journal of International Law. 2025;(2):49-70. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2025-2-49-70