Issues of Interpretation and Application of the Notion of “International Legal Legitimation”

INTRODUCTION. In the process of adapting to the changing realities of geopolitics and international law, collective legitimation has become one of the main political functions of the UN as a means of politically significant approval (or disapproval) of the behaviour and positions of states as consistent with international law and at the same time meeting the needs of the present, a means of recognising them as legitimate (or illegitimate). Awareness of the dynamic nature of such a phenomenon of contemporary international law as “international legal legitimation”, competent mastery of international legal argumentation skills, their constant improvement and updating, innovative approach to the formulation of international legal positions that could really claim to be dominant and progressive, development of an optimal mechanism for their articulation and legitimation will allow to ensure the competitiveness of Russia’s international legal policy among such rigid, wilful, but, it should be admitted, calculating and shrewd strategies of legitimation, which are applied primarily by the United States of America. Against the background of Washington’s generally successful and effective international legal legitimation of its interventions, as a result of which not a single resolution was adopted either by the UN Security Council or the UN General Assembly (UNGA) that would have qualified the American invasions of Iraq, Libya or Syria as “aggression”, the international legal support for the Russian Federation’s special military operation in the Ukraine (SVO) needs to be improved, since precisely this qualification was given to it by the UNGA. The relevance and significance of the issue increases in view of the need to enhance the quality of the international legal justification of the SVO, which should be aimed at the recognition, approval and acceptance by the majority of members of the international community of Russia’s international legal position on this issue, i. e. at its international legal legitimation, capable of reversing the currently prevailing pro-Western international legal consciousness. Therefore, this phenomenon encapsulates a tremendous applied value in the context of the increasing number of hybrid threats to the national security of our country and the emergence of new sources of such threats.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. The theoretical and empirical basis of the research is constituted by domestic and mainly foreign international legal literature with an emphasis on the latest scientific developments and also with reference to the relevant to the topic law enforcement practice (practice of the International Court of Justice) and material of specialised dictionaries. On the basis of integrative (multidimensional) approach to scientific legal research, taking into account such principles of scientific cognition as theoretical novelty and scientific relevance, the study was guided, in particular, by hermeneutic, formal-legal, formallogical, structural-functional and systematic methods, as well as methods of analysis and synthesis, legal modelling, legal construction and strategic planning.

RESEARCH RESULTS. The article reviews relevant studies on the term “legitimation” in international law, outlines various approaches to the definition and interpretation of this notion, reveals the content and structural elements of the process of international legal legitimation aimed at achieving, recognising or confirming the legitimacy of an international legal position of a state. Forming her own vision of the notion of “international legal legitimation”, the author has devised a number of classifications (structural schemes): a typology of approaches to the definition of the term “legitimation” (nihilistic, idealistic and compromise), the structure of the process of international legal legitimation, the types of international legal legitimation according to the time and will criteria.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS. Amid the large-scale and powerful “legal aggression” of the West against Russia, the phenomenon of international legal legitimation of the state’s actions often raises the question of the need to be bold, inventive and even creative in formulating international legal positions in a particular area. Our hypothesis is that in the real world, in which international law is a “product of a game of powers and interests”, the direct and active involvement of the Russian Federation in the process of constructing a common model of international legal legitimation of states’ positions would help to increase the effectiveness of the protection of Russian interests. The first step on this path could be the development and approbation of an international legal mechanism of legitimation of Russia’s international legal position on the SVO. Besides, it is important to analyse the international legal legitimation practices of particular states not only in order to study and potentially absorb their experience, but also to learn how to predict and anticipate further international legal manoeuvres of a certain country so as to be able to respond to them in a timely and appropriate manner.

1. Alter K.J., Li J. Chinese and Western Perspectives on the Rule of Law and their International Implications. – The Cambridge Handbook of China and International Law. Ed. by I. de la Rasilla and C. Cai. Cambridge University Press. 2024. P. 94-112. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1017/9781009041133.007.

2. Apffelstaedt K., Schrage S., Gilbert D. U. Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives and Legitimacy: A Deliberative Systems Perspective. – Business Ethics Quarterly. Published online by Cambridge University Press. 2023. P. 1-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2023.12.

3. d’Aspremont J., De Brabandere E. The Complementary Faces of Legitimacy in International Law: The Legitimacy of Origin and the Legitimacy of Exercise. – Fordham International Law Journal. 2011. Vol. 34. Issue 2. Article 3. P. 190-235.

4. Becker B. The New Legitimacy and International Legitimation: Civilization and South African Foreign Policy. – Foreign Policy Analysis. 2010. Vol. 6. Issue 2. P. 133-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2010.00105.x.

5. Bjola C. Legitimating the Use of Force in International Politics: A Communicative Action Perspective. – European Journal of International Relations. 2005. Vol. 11. Issue 2. P. 266-303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066105052968.

6. Black’s Law Dictionary. Definitions of the Terms and Phrases of American and English Jurisprudence, Ancient and Modern. Revised fourth edition by the publisher’s editorial staff. St. Paul, Minn. West Publishing Co. 1968. 1882 p.

7. Black’s Law Dictionary. 9th ed. Bryan A. Garner (Editor in Chief). West, a Thomson Reuters. 2009. 1920 p.

8. Bodansky D. The Legitimacy of International Governance: A Coming Challenge for International Environmental Law? – American Journal of International Law. 1999. Vol. 93. Issue 3. P. 596-624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/ 2555262.

9. Bodansky D. The Concept of Legitimacy in International Law. – Legitimacy in International Law. Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht. Band 194. Ed. by R. Wolfrum and V. Röben. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 2008. P. 309-317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-540-77764-9_14.

10. Bodansky D. Legitimacy in International Law and International Relations. – Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art. Ed. by J.L. Dunoff and M.A. Pollack. Cambridge University Press. 2012. P. 321-342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139107310.016.

11. Brierly J.L. The Law of Nations. An Introduction to the International Law of Peace. Sixth Edition. Revised by Waldock C. H. M. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1963. 442 p.

12. Brunnée J., Toope S. J. Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account. Cambridge University Press. 2010. 411 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9780511781261.

13. Buchanan A. The Legitimacy of International Law. – The Philosophy of International Law. Ed. by S. Besson and J. Tasioulas. New York: Oxford University Press. 2010. P. 79-96.

14. Buchanan A., Keohane R.O. The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions. – Ethics & International Affairs. 2006. Vol. 20. Issue 4. P. 405-437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2006.00043.x.

15. Caron D.D. The Legitimacy of the Collective Authority of the Security Council. – The American Journal of International Law. 1993. Vol. 87. No. 4. P. 552-588. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.2307/2203616.

16. Chernichenko S.V. Kontury mezhdunarodnogo prava. Obshchie voprosy [Contours of International Law. General Issues.]. Moscow: Nauchnaja kniga Publ. 2014. 592 p. (In Russ.)

17. Chesterman S., Johnstone I., Malone D. M. Law and Practice of the United Nations: Documents and Commentary. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2016. 741 p.

18. Claude I.L. Collective Legitimization as a Political Function of the United Nations. – International Organization. 1966. Vol. 20. Issue 3. P. 367-379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0020818300012832.

19. Crawford J. The Problems of Legitimacy-Speak. – Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting. 2004. Vol. 98. P. 271-273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272503700061425.

20. Danelyan A.A., Oganesyan T.D. Mezhdunarodnyj ugolovnyj sud i immunitety [International Criminal Court and Immunities]. – Jelektronnoe setevoe izdanie “Mezhdunarodnyj pravovoj kur'er” [Electronic network edition “International Legal Courier”]. 2024. (In Russ.). URL: https://inter-legal.ru/mezhdunarodnyj-ugolovnyj-sud-i-immunitety#_ftnref1 (accessed date: 06.03.2024).

21. Dellavalle S. Legitimacy and Rationality in National and International Law-Making. – European Society of International Law (ESIL) Paper Series. 2022. P. 1-24. URL: https:// hdl.handle.net/1814/74559 (accessed date: 12.05.2024).

22. Eichenberg R.C. Victory Has Many Friends: U.S. Public Opinion and the Use of Military Forde, 1981-2005. – International Security. 2005. Vol. 30. No. 1. 146. P. 140-177.

23. Falk R. The Iraq War and the Future of International Law. – Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting. 2004. Vol. 98. P. 263- 266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272503700061395.

24. Falk R., Juergensmeyer M., Popovski V. Legality and Legitimacy in Global Affairs. Oxford University Press. 2012. 459 p.

25. Franck T.M. Legitimacy in the International System. – The American Journal of International Law. 1988. Vol. 82. No. 4. P. 705-759. DOI: https://doi.org/doi:10.2307/2203510.

26. Franck T.M. The Power of Legitimacy among Nations. Oxford University Press. 1990. 320 p.

27. Franck T.M. Fairness in International Law and Institutions. Oxford University Press UK. 1995. 536 p.

28. Habermas J. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Band I. Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung. Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp. 1981. 534 p.

29. Habermas J. Legitimationsprobleme im Spätkapitalismus (1973). Suhrkamp Verlag, 14. Auflage. 2019. 208 S.

30. Hakimi M. Fractures in the Foundation: Is Waging Aggressive War Still Prohibited by International Law? – Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting. 2022. Vol. 116. P. 87. https://doi.org/10.1017/amp.2022.19.

31. Hardy J. Legitimacy in the Use of Force: Opinio or Juris? – Proceedings of the Sixth Oceanic Conference on International Studies. University of Melbourne. 2014. P. 1-17.

32. Herdegen M. Völkerrecht. 22., überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage. Grundrisse des Rechts. München: Verlag C.H.Beck. 2023. 553 S.

33. Higgins R. Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It. Oxford Scholarly Authorities on International Law, Clarendon Press. 1995. 304 p.

34. Howse R. The Legitimacy of the World Trade Organization. – The Legitimacy of International Organizations. Ed. by J.-M. Coicaud and V. Heiskanen. Tokyo: UN University Press. 2001. P. 355-407.

35. Hughes D. How States Persuade: An Account of International Legal Argument Upon the Use of Force. – Georgetown Journal of International Law. 2019. Vol. 50. No. 4. P. 839-946.

36. Jongen H., Scholte J.A. Institutional Sources of Legitimacy in Multistakeholder Global Governance at ICANN. – Regulation & Governance. 2024. Vol. 18. Issue 3. P. 1018-1039. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12565.

37. Kamminga M.T. Confiscating Russia’s Frozen Central Bank Assets: A Permissible Third-Party Countermeasure? – Netherlands International Law Review. 2023. Vol. 70. P. 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-023- 00231-7.

38. Koskenniemi M. “Not Excepting the Iroquois Themselves…”. Machiavelli, Pufendorf and the Prehistory of International Law. European University Institute, Max Weber Programme, Max Weber Lecture Series. 2007. 41 p.

39. Koskenniemi M. Miserable Comforters: International Relations as New Natural Law. – European Journal of International Relations. 2009. Vol. 15. Issue 3. P. 395-422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066109338229.

40. Koskenniemi M. Law, Teleology and International Relations: An Essay in Counterdisciplinarity. – International Relations. 2012. Vol. 26. Issue 1. P. 3-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117811433080.

41. Krahmann E. From Performance to Performativity: The Legitimization of US Security Contracting and its Consequences. – Security Dialogue. 2017. Vol. 48. Issue 6. P. 541- 559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010617722650.

42. Kumm M. The Legitimacy of International Law: A Constitutionalist Framework of Analysis. European Journal of International Law. 2004. Vol. 15. Issue 5. P. 907-931. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/15.5.907.

43. de Lacharrière G. La Politique Juridique Extérieure. Economica, Collection Enjeux Internationaux, Paris. 1983. 236 p.

44. Lefkowitz D. The Legitimacy of International Law. – Philosophy and International Law: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy and Law. Cambridge University Press. 2020. P. 98-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316481653.006.

45. Legitimating Decisions in International Economic Law. – Establishing Judicial Authority in International Economic Law. Ed. by J. Jemielniak, L. Nielsen, H. P. Olsen. Cambridge International Trade and Economic Law. Cambridge University Press. 2016. P. 213-319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316544860.

46. Luban D. Fairness to Rightness: Jurisdiction, Legality, and the Legitimacy of International Criminal Law. – The Philosophy of International Law. Ed. by S. Besson and J. Tasioulas. New York: Oxford University Press. 2010. P. 569-588.

47. Lukashuk I.I. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. Obshchaja chast': ucheb. dlja studentov jurid. fak. i vuzov. [International Law. General Part: Textbook for Students of Law Faculties and Universities]. Izd. 3-e, pererab. i dop. Moscow: Wolters Kluwer Publ. 2005. 432 p. (In Russ.)

48. Murase S. Unilateral Responses to International Terrorism: Self-defense or Law Enforcement? – Multiculturalism and International Law. Ed. by S. Yee and J. Morin. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill | Nijhoff. 2009. P. 429-453.

49. Müllerson R.A. Dawn of a New Order. Geopolitics and the Clash of Ideologies. I.B.Tauris, London | New York. 2017. 277 p.

50. Müllerson R.A. Regime Change: From Democratic Peace Theories to Forcible Regime Change. Nijhoff Law Specials, Volume 84. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden | Boston. 2013. 247 p.

51. O’Connell M.E. The End of Legitimacy. – Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting. 2004. Vol. 98. P. 269-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272503700061413.

52. Opinion of the International Law Advisory Board, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation. Problems of Legality of the International Criminal Court (translation by graduate students V.V. Pchelintseva and A.M. Korzhenyak). – Moscow Journal of International Law. 2024. No. 2. P. 92-104.

53. Orakhelashvili A. International Law and International Politics. Foundations of Interdisciplinary Analysis. Principles of International Law. Edward Elgar Publishing. 2020. 304 p.

54. Pellet A., Miron A., Forteau M., Nguyen Q. D., Daillier P. Droit International Public. 9e éd. Paris: LGDJ, Lextenso. 2022. 2048 p.

55. Popovski V., Turner N. Legality and Legitimacy in International Order. – United Nations University, Policy Brief. 2008. No. 5. P. 1-8.

56. Problemy pravomernosti dejatel'nosti Mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo suda: Zakljuchenie Mezhdunarodno-pravovogo soveta pri MID Rossii. Рerevod A.M. Korzhenyak, V.V. Pchelintsevoj (MGIMO MID Rossii). [Problems of Legality of the International Criminal Court: Conclusion of the International Law Advisory Board under the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia. Translated by A. M. Korzhenyak, V. V. Pchelintseva]. Moscow: Diplomaticheskaja akademija MID Rossii Publ. 2024. 64 p. (In Russ.)

57. Quadri R. Diritto internazionale pubblico. III edizione. G. Priulla Editore Palermo. 1960. 653 p.

58. Ratner S.R. Persuading to Comply: On the Deployment and Avoidance of Legal Argumentation. – Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art. Ed. by J.L. Dunoff and M.A. Pollack. Cambridge University Press. 2012. P. 568-590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139107310.028.

59. Roberts A. Legality vs Legitimacy: Can Uses of Force be Illegal but Justified? – Human Rights, Intervention, and the Use of Force, Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law. Ed. by P. Alston and E. Macdonald. Oxford. 2008. P. 179-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552719.003.0005.

60. Salmon J. Dictionnaire de droit international public. Bruylant. 2001. 1200 p.

61. Schachter O. The Role of Power in International Law. – Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law). 1999. Vol. 93. P. 200-205.

62. Schwarzenberger G., Brown E.D. A Manual of International Law. 6th ed. Professional Books Limited. 1976. 612 p.

63. Schwarzenberger G. International Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals. Volume III. International Constitutional Law. Fundamentals – The United Nations – Related Agencies. London, Stevens & Sons Limited. 1976. 680 p.

64. Shaw M.N. International Law. 9th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2021. 1308 p.

65. Slaughter A.-M. The Use of Force in Iraq: Illegal and Illegitimate. – Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting. 2004. Vol. 98. P. 262-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272503700061383.

66. Steffek J. The Legitimation of International Governance: A Discourse Approach. – European Journal of International Relations. 2003. Vol. 9. Issue 2. P. 249-275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066103009002004.

67. Tago A. Why Do States Join US-Led Military Coalitions? The Compulsion of the Coalition’s Missions and Legitimacy. – International Relations of the Asia-Pacific. 2007. Vol. 7. No. 2. P. 179-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcl001.

68. Tasioulas J. Parochialism and the Legitimacy of International Law. – Parochialism, Cosmopolitanism, and the Foundations of International Law. Ed. by M.N.S. Sellers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2011. P. 16-39.

69. The Charter to the United Nations: A Commentary. Ed. by B. Simma. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1994. 1258 p.

70. The Kosovo Report: Conflict, International Response, Lessons Learned. Independent International Commission on Kosovo. Oxford. 2000. 372 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199243093.001.0001.

71. The Legitimacy of International Organizations. Ed. by J.-M. Coicaud and V. Heiskanen. Tokyo: UN University Press. 2001. 578 p.

72. Thomas C.A. The Concept of Legitimacy and International Law. – LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers. 2013. P. 1-32.

73. Thomas C.A. The Uses and Abuses of Legitimacy in International Law. – Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2014. Vol. 4. Issue 4. P. 729-758. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqu008.

74. Tomsinov V. A. «Krymskoe pravo», ili Juridicheskie osnovanija vossoedinenija Kryma s Rossiej [“Crimean Law”, or Legal Foundations of Crimea’s Reunification with Russia]. Moscow: IKD Zertsalo-M Publ. 2016. 132 p. (In Russ.)

75. Virally M. Réflexions sur la Politique Juridique des Etats. – Le Droit International en Devenir, Graduate nstitute Publications. 1990. P. 123-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.iheid.4388.

76. Vylegzhanin A.N., Magomedova O.S. Mezhdunarodnopravovaja politika gosudarstva. Sovremennye kontseptsii [International legal policy of a state. Modern concepts]. – Mezhdunarodnye protsessy [International Trends]. 2022. No. 3. P. 112-126. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2022.20.3.70.7.

77. Vylegzhanin A.N., Korzhenyak A.M. Mekhanizm mezhdunarodno-pravovoj legitimatsii vooruzhennogo vtorzhenija SShA v Irak v 2003 g.: uroki na budushhee (chast' 1) [The Mechanism of International Legal Legitimation of the 2003 U.S. Armed Invasion of Iraq: Lessons for the Future (Part 1)]. – Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta [Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law]. 2025a. No. 1 (in print). (In Russ.).

78. Vylegzhanin A.N., Korzhenyak A.M. Mekhanizm mezhdunarodno-pravovoj legitimatsii vooruzhennogo vtorzhenija SShA v Irak v 2003 g.: uroki na budushhee (chast' 2) [The Mechanism of International Legal Legitimation of the 2003 U.S. Armed Invasion of Iraq: Lessons for the Future (Part 2)]. – Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta [Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law]. 2025b. No. 2 (in print). (In Russ.).

79. Weber M. Rechtssoziologie. Neuwied, Hermann Luchterhand Verlag. 1960. 346 s.

80. Welsh J., Zaum D. Legitimation and the UN Security Council. – Legitimating International Organizations. Ed. by D. Zaum. Oxford (online edn). 2013. P. 65-87. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199672097.003.0004.

81. Wheatley S. The Democratic Legitimacy of International Law (Studies in International Law). Hart Publishing. 2010. 424 p.

82. Wolfrum R. Legitimacy of International Law from a Legal Perspective: Some Introductory Considerations. – Legitimacy in International Law. Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht. Band 194. Ed. by R. Wolfrum and V. Röben. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 2008. P. 1-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77764-9_1.

83. Zaum D. International Organizations, Legitimacy, and Legitimation. – Legitimating International Organizations. Ed. by D. Zaum. Oxford (online edn). 2013. P. 3-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199672097.003.0001.