When and Why the Doctrine of a “Rules-Based International Order” Emerged

INTRODUCTION. It is no understatement to say that the “rules-based international order” doctrine, as opposed to the “international order based on law”, has emerged as one of the most debated concepts in global politics during in the late ХХ and early ХХI centuries. This concept presents a framework where general rules of conduct for states, though not norms of jus cogens under general international law, are considered legally binding for all states and other participants in international relations. Consequently, it challenges the traditionally recognized supremacy of international law in governing these relations, seeking to erode established practices of international law-making. This doctrine is actively utilized by leading Western powers to substantiate their political positions and accuse strategic competitors of failing to adhere to these “rules” deemed as legally binding. Understanding the essence and origin of this doctrine is crucial in unraveling its significance.

 MATERIALS AND METHODS. The set of used methodological approaches encompass a range of general scientific and specialized methods, including historical analysis, formal logic, synthesis, as well as systemic and comparative legal methods.

RESEARCH RESULTS. The research indicates that the doctrine of a rules-based international order entered international diplomatic discourse in the early 1990s, arising as a consequence of the collapse of the Soviet Union and the emergence of a unipolar world.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS. The author reaches the conclusion that in the context of this emerging unipolarity, the United States deemed it appropriate to unilaterally (or at most in conjunction with its closest allies) dictate universally binding rules of conduct in international relations to the global community. The doctrine of a rules-based internation[1]al order provided the necessary scientific justification to validate such a policy. Initially, this doctrine garnered substantial support in international politics but subsequently faced a decline in its proponents, particularly with the shift towards a polycentric world order. While it continues to exist to some extent, the goals for which it was originally conceived have been largely nullified.

1. Alekseev S.S. Obshhie dozvoleniya i obshhie zaprety` v sovetskom prave [General permissions and general prohibitions in Soviet law]. Moscow: Yurid. lit. 1989. 288 p. (In Russ.)

2. Chalmers M. Which Rules? Why There is No Single ‘RulesBased International System’. London: Royal United Services Institute. 2019. 52 p. (In Engl.)

3. Dugard J. The choice before us: International law or a ‘rules-based International order’. – Leiden Journal of International Law. 2023. № 36. P. 223-232.

4. E`llison G. Mif o liberal`nom poryadke. Ot istoricheskoj sluchajnosti k obshheprinyatomu mneniyu [The myth of the liberal order. From historical accident to conventional wisdom]. – Rossiya v global`noj politike [Russia in global politics]. 2018. T. 16. № 4. P. 174-184. (In Russ.)

5. E`ntin M., E`ntina E. Ot mirovogo liberal`nogo poryadka k normalizacii mezhdunarodny`x otnoshenij [From Liberal World Order to Normalization of International Relations]. – Mirovaya e`konomika i mezhdunarodny`e otnosheniya [World economy and international relations]. 2017. T. 61. № 12. P. 5-17. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-12-5-17 (In Russ.)

6. Grinin L.E. Global`ny`e processy` i kontury` novogo mirovogo poryadka [The global processes and the contours of a new world’s order]. – Filosofiya i obshhestvo [Philosophy and Society]. 2015. № 3-4 (77). P. 7-33. (In Russ.)

7. Hosoya Y. Defending the Liberal International Order: The UK–Japan Partnership in an Uncertain World. – The UK and Japan: Forging a Global and Proactive Partnership. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs. 2019. P. 73-83. (In Engl.)

8. Ikenberry J. G. The Liberal International Order and its Discontents. – Journal of International Studies. № 3 (38). 2010. P. 512. (In Engl.)

9. Kalamanov V.A. Formirovanie novy`x global`ny`x «Pravil igry`»: rol` Rossii [The formation of the new global “Rules of the game”: The role of Russia]. – Vestnik RUDN: Mezhdunarodny`e otnosheniya [Bulletin of the RUDN: International Relations]. 2016. № 1. P. 95-113. (In Russ.)

10. Kroenig M., Cimmino J. Global Strategy 2021: An Allied Strategy for China. Washington: Atlantic Council. Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security. 2020. 83 p. (In Engl.)

11. Kulikov M.A. Manipulirovanie yuridicheskimi celyami i sredstvami v pravotvorcheskom processe i ego rezul`taty`[Manipulation of legal goals and means in the lawmaking process and its results]. – Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravooxranitel`naya praktika [Legal science and law enforcement practice]. 2022. № 3 (61). P. 6-14. (In Russ.)

12. Lavrov S.V. O prave, pravax i pravilax [About the law, rights and rules]. – Rossiya v global`noj politike [Russia in global politics]. 2021. № 4 (110). P. 8-20. (In Russ.)

13. Nefedov B.I. Ponyatie «pravila» v doktrine «mezhdunarodnogo poryadka, osnovannogo na pravilax» [The concept of “rules” in the doctrine of “the world (international) order based on rules”]. – Rossiya i sovremenny`j mir [Russia and the modern world]. 2021. № 3. P. 6-21. (In Russ.)

14. Raymond G., Nasu H., Seng Tan S., McLaughlin R. et al. Prospects for the Rules-Based Global Order. Canberra: Australian National University. Strategic and Defence Studies Centre. 2017. 25 p. (In Engl.)

15. Scott Sh. International Law as Ideology: Theorising the Relationship between International Law and International Politics. – European Journal of International Law. 1994. Vol. 5. Issue 3. P. 313-325. (In Engl.)

16. Scott Sh. The Decline of International Law as a Normative Ideal. – Victoria University of Wellington Law Review. 2018. Vol. 49 (4). P. 630-631. (In Engl.)

17. Sellars K. Rules or Law? Kenneth Bailey and the Law of the Sea. – Australian Outlook. Online journal of the Australian Institute of International Affairs. 26 July. 2018. (In Engl.)

18. Voronin E.R. Liberal`ny`j poryadok, osnovanny`j na «pravilax», i mezhdunarodnoe pravo [A liberal order based on “rules” and international law]. – Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn` [International life]. 2020. № 2. P. 88-95. (In Russ.)

19. Vylegzhanin A.N., Nefedov B.I., Voronin E.R., Magomedova O.S., Zotova P.K. The Term “Rules-based International Order” in International Legal Discourses – Moscow Journal of International Law. 2021. No. 2. P. 35-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2021-2-35-60. (In Engl.)

20. Ward A. “Adapt or Die”, Ideas for Modernizing the RulesBased International Order. – Chatham House Expert Perspectives. June 2019. P. 5. (In Engl.)

21. Weber M. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. London: W. Hodge. 1947. 403 p. (In Engl.)