Preview

Moscow Journal of International Law

Advanced search

Statehood and its International Legal Significance

https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2024-2-6-18

Abstract

INTRODUCTION. The modern system of international relations features an incredible complexity of its processes and events. Thus, in different countries there is a transformation of the existing state-legal forms as well as crises of government institutions. New types of states are appearingon the political map of the world while the established forms of international cooperationare changing. Nevertheless, states are still the main participants of international communication.

MATHERIALS AND METHODS. Therefore, to perform an in-depth analysis of the modern international system of international relations as a whole and the position of individual states in it with quantitative indicators, one needs to create research tools that allow to make a qualitative assessment. We consider the category of “statehood” to be one of the main categories able to most fully assess the qualitative position of certain states in the world system and analyze various external manifestations of their essential and most significant characteristics. This article is devoted to a theoretical analysis of the category of “statehood” as a concept through which the unchanging essence of the state as a political unity and as a participant of international communication as well as the description of the forms of its external representation in international relations.

RESEARCH RESULTS. Statehood appears as a comprehensive characteristic of the state organization of society and the degree of development of its intangible culture, which is externally distributed in various methods and forms of the political and legal structure of this society and the basis for the historical continuity of its development. Statehood is not identical to the concept of the state, as it is a qualitative characteristic of a state-organized society. Statehood is a reflection of the internal organizing essence of the state. The carrier of statehood is the people.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS. The main conclusions of the conducted research are as follows. First, the main forms of external realization of statehood in international law are the authority of the state and its national state tradition. The authority of the state is connected with the concept of international legality and is based on the constant and conscious adherence of the state to the general principles and principles of international law. National state tradition characterizes the state as a participant in international legal relations, possessing its own established state culture. Secondly, the modern system of international relations appears as a system of relations of authority of states, behind which there are all their diverse and multifaceted statuses and characteristics.

About the Author

I. A. Romaikin
National Research Mordovia State University
Russian Federation

Romaikin Ivan A., Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of State and Administrative Law

68, Bolschevistskaya st., Saransk, Republic of Mordovia, 430005



References

1. Brounli Ja. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo [International Law]. V 2 kn. Kn. 1. Moscow: Progress, 1977. 535 p. (In Russ.)

2. Brownlie I. Principles of public international law. 4th ed. Oxford, 1990. 748 p.

3. Crawford J. The criteria for statehood in international law.– British yearbook of International law. 1977. P. 93-182.

4. Cybulevskaja O.I. Aksiologicheskij podhod k pravu v globalizirujushhemsja mire [An axiological approach to law in a globalizing world]. – Bajkal'skie komparativistskie chtenija. Materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii [Baikal comparative readings. Materials of the international scientific and practical conference]. Irkutsk, 2022. P. 52-59 (In Russ.)

5. Cybulevskaja O.I., Milusheva T.V. Nravstvenno-pravovoe izmerenie predelov gosudarstvennoj vlasti [The moral and legal measurement of the limits of state power]. – Law and Modern States [Pravo i sovremennye gosudarstva]. 2015. № 6. P. 10-17. (In Russ.)

6. Cybulevskaja O.I., Milusheva T.V. Problema svobody i otvetstvennosti cherez prizmu analiticheskoj filosofii [The problem of freedom and responsibility through the prism of analytical philosophy]. – Juridicheskaja tehnika [Legal technique]. 2024. Vol. 18. P. 205-208.

7. Grachev N.I. Sushhnost' gosudarstva. [The essence of the state]. – Vestnik Saratovskoj gosudarstvennoj juridicheskoj akademii [Bulletin of the Saratov State Law Academy]. 2017. № 4 (117). P. 11-24. (In Russ.)

8. Il'in I.A. O sushhnosti pravosoznanija [About the essence of legal consciousness]. Moscow: Rarog, 1993. 235 p. (In Russ.)

9. Il'in M.V. Al'ternativnye formy suverennoj gosudarstvennosti [Alternative forms of sovereign statehood]. – Comparative Politics [Sravnitel'naja politika]. 2011. № 3 (5). Vol. 2. P. 11-19 (In Russ.)

10. Il'in M.V. Formula gosudarstvennosti [The formula of statehood]. – Politiya. 2008. № 3. P. 67-78 (In Russ.)

11. Komarovskij L. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo [International law]. Moscow, 1905. 118 p. (In Russ.)

12. Kotareva O.V. Gosudarstvennost': teoretiko-pravovoj aspekt [Statehood: theoretical and legal aspect]. – Vestnik Sibirskogo juridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii [Bulletin of the Siberian Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia]. 2023. Vol. 2 (53). P. 151-155.

13. Martens F.F. O konsulah i konsul'skoj jurisdikcii na Vostoke [About consuls and consular jurisdiction in the East]. St. Petersburg, 1873. 601 p. (In Russ.)

14. Oppengejm L. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo [International law]. Moscow: State Publishing House of Foreign Literature, 1948-1950. Vol. 1: The World. Vol. 1. 408 p. (In Russ.)

15. Shhipkov A.V. Social-tradicija [Social tradition]. Moscow: AST-PRESS BOOK, 2017. 320 p. (In Russ.).

16. Shumilov V.M. O «Global'nom prave» kak formirujushhejsja pravovoj supersisteme [About «Global Law» as an emerging legal supersystem]. – Moskovskij zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava [Moscow Journal of International Law]. 2015. № 4. P. 4-17.

17. Sulejmanov B.B. Gosudarstvennost': problemy osmyslenija kategorii [Statehood: problems of understanding the category]. – Rossijskoe pravo onlajn [Russian Law Online]. 2020. Vol. 1. P. 5-9.

18. Tihomirov L.A. Monarhicheskaja gosudarstvennost' [Monarchical statehood]. Moscow: Publishing House «E», 2016. 608 p. (In Russ.)

19. Tokarev A.A. Konceptualizacija i operacionalizacija ponjatija «gosudarstvennost'» [Conceptualization and operationalization of the concept of «statehood»]. – Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta [Bulletin of MGIMO University]. 2012. № 4 (25). P. 247-254 (In Russ.)

20. Tomsinov V.A. Hristianskaja doktrina mezhdunarodnogo prava v tvorchestve L.A. Komarovskogo [The Christian Doctrine of International Law in the works of L.A. Komarovsky]. – Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Serija 11: Pravo [Bulletin of the Moscow University. Series 11: Law]. 2019. № 3. P. 38-67 (In Russ.)

21. Velichko A.M., prot. Timofej Fetisov. Biblejskaja filosofija prava i vlasti [The Biblical philosophy of law and power]. Moskow: Veche, 2016. 192 p. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Romaikin I.A. Statehood and its International Legal Significance. Moscow Journal of International Law. 2024;(2):6-18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2024-2-6-18

Views: 1129


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0869-0049 (Print)
ISSN 2619-0893 (Online)