Limits of Application of the jura novit arbiter Principle in International Arbitration: Some Issues of Theory and Practice

INTRODUCTION. The principle of jura novit arbiter or jura novit tribunus is an analogue of the doctrine of jura novit curia in international arbitration proceedings which is free from the peculiarities of national laws. The significance of its application in international arbitration lies in the powers of an arbitral tribunal to participate in ascertaining the content of the applicable law. Given the features of international arbitration, material limitations are put on the jura novit arbiter principle in order to protect the rights and interests of disputing parties. However, limitations have both positive and negative legal effects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. The authors researched the provisions of international treaties, case law of tribunals and state courts demonstrating the scope of the arbitrator’s discretionary powers and the effects of its limitation, as well as the works of Russian and foreign scholars. The methodological basis of the research includes general scientific and special methods.

RESEARCH RESULTS. The analyses of international treaties and case law led to the elaboration of the list of the main limits of the jura novit arbiter application. The study examined the issues in the relationship between jura novit arbiter and other principles aimed at narrowing the scope of its functioning.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS. The results of the analysis allow to draw the following conclusions. First, there are three major constraints put on the arbitrators' discretion: 1) ne ultra petita (not beyond the request), 2) due process in terms of a right to be heard and the foreseeability test, 3) expediency and efficiency of arbitral proceedings. Secondly, the limitation of the principle is a double-edged sword: on the one hand, it ensures legal certainty and predictability of an arbitral proceeding and its outcome, secures the rights and interests of the parties. On the other hand, the aforementioned limitations reveal also some downsides: there is no clear guidance on identifying conditions under which the ne ultra petita principle does not serve as a boundary of the jura novit arbiter principle; the "foreseeability" is an evaluative concept; and the imbalance between expediency and efficiency principles and jura novit arbiter may give rise to concerns about the established content of the applicable law.

1. Alberti C.P. Iura Novit Curia in International Commercial Arbitration - How much justice do you want?. – International Arbitration and International Commercial Law: Synergy, Convergence and Evolution. The Hague: Kluwer Law International. 2011. P. 3-32.

2. Alberti C.P., Bigge D. Ascertaining the content of the applicable law and jura novit tribunus: approaches in commercial and investment arbitration. – Dispute Resolution Journal. Vol. 70. No. 2. P. 1-20.

3. Born G. International commercial arbitration. 2nd ed. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business. 2014. 4408 p.

4. Capper M. Proving the Contents of the Applicable Substantive Law(s). – The application of substantive law by international arbitrators. Institute Dossier XI. Paris: ICC. 2014. P. 31-54.

5. Concise International Arbitration. Ed. by L.A. Mistelis. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International. 2010. 1115 p.

6. Dimolitsa A. The equivocal power of the arbitrators to introduce ex officio new issues of law. – ASA Bull. 2009. Vol. 27. Issue 2. P. 427-440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/asab2009042

7. Ferrari F., Kröll S. Conflict of Laws in International Commercial Arbitration. New York: Juris. 2019. 472 p.

8. Fouchard Gaillard & Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration. Ed. by E. Gaillard and J. Savage. 1999. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International. 1280 p.

9. Hunter M. Philip A. The Duties of an Arbitrator. – The leading arbitrators’ guide to international arbitration. New York: JurisNet. 2014. P. 477-490.

10. Jarvin S. The Sources and Limits of the Arbitrator’s Powers. – Arbitration International. 1986. Vol. 2. Issue 2. P. 140- 163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/2.2.140

11. Kurkela M.S. Due process in arbitration: a Finnish perspective. – Journal of International Arbitration. 2004. Vol. 21. Issue 2. P. 221-225.

12. Lew J. Iura Novit Curia and Due Process. – Queen Mary School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper. 2011. No. 72/2010. 19 p. URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID1733531_code1175289.pdf?abstractid=1733531&mirid=1 (accessed 01.04.2023)

13. Ly F. Conflicts of Law in International Arbitration-An Overview. Munich: European Law Publishers. 2011. 16 p.

14. Mantakou A.P. The misadventures of the principle jura novit curia in international arbitration-a practitioner’s approach. – Essays in honour of Spyridon Vl. Vrellis. Ed. by I. Kunda. Athen: Nomiki Vivliothiki. 2014. P. 487-498.

15. Mohamed S.A.W. Ascertaining the content of the applicable law in international arbitration: converging civil and common law approaches. – The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management. 2017. Vol. 83. Issue 4. P. 112-122

16. Monteiro M.V. Jura novit curia in international commercial arbitration. Helsinki: University of Helsinki. 2013. 53 p.

17. Popov E.V. Voprosy vybora primenimogo prava v mezhdunarodnom kommercheskom i investitsionnom arbitrazhe [Issues of Selection of Applicable Law in the International Commercial and Investment Arbitration]. – Mezhdunarodnoe ekonomicheskoe pravo. 2017. No. 1. P. 45-54. (In Russ.)

18. Scherer M. 2005. The Recognition of Transnational Substantive Rules by Courts in Arbitral Matters. – Towards a uniform international arbitration law?. New York: IAI Series on International Arbitration. P. 91-121.

19. Wobeser C. 2011. The Effective Use of Legal Sources: How Much Is Too Much and What Is the Role for Iura Novit Curia?. – Arbitration Advocacy in Changing Times. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International. P. 207-220