“Gender” in International Human Rights Law: Theory and Practice

INTRODUCTION. The institute for the protection of women both at international and national levels taking into account the ongoing discussions on the term “gender” is considered in the article. The authors examine the distinction between concepts “sex”, “gender” and “gender identity”, enshrined in international legal acts and documents, the States’ positions and approaches to their use, including on the example of the implementation of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence Against Women and Domestic Violence, better known as the Istanbul Convention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. During the research the authors used different international legal documents, including international treaties, recommendations of the United Nations treaty bodies, reports of the special rapporteurs and international experts, outcome documents of international conferences, as well as doctrinal sources and national legislation of foreign countries. The study was carried out based on general scientific and special scientific methods. The methods of legal modeling and forecasting were widely used in the analysis in order to define prospects for possible future studies and development of international human rights law on the protection of women from violence and domestic violence.

RESEARCH RESULTS. Demonstrating different approaches to understanding the term “gender” in protecting women from violence and domestic violence, implemented by international organizations and States, the authors examined factors that influence the position of national authorities of a number of countries when considering the possibility of accession or ratification of the core international legal acts in this area on the example of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence Against Women and Domestic Violence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION. The authors came into conclusion that the problems of violence against women and domestic violence should be viewed through the lens of gender equality concept, which does not entail the elimination of biological differences between two sexes and does not encourage women and men to change their social roles. The article stresses the need for an internationally agreed definition of the term “gender” in order to strengthen the legal and institutional mechanisms for a more efficient practical implementation of measures to combat violence against women and domestic violence.

1. Alisievich E.S. Prisoedinenie Rossii k Konventsii Soveta Evropy o preduprezhdenii i bor''be s nasiliem v otnoshenii zhenshchin i domashnim nasiliem 2011 goda: mif ili real''nost''? – Аktual''nye problemy sovremennogo mezhdunarodnogo prava. Materialy XV Mezhdunarodnogo kongressa. V 3-kh chastyakh. Chast' 1 [Topical Issues of Modern International Law. Materials of International Congress. In 3 parts. Part I]. Moscow: RUDN Publ. P. 232– 244. (In Russ.)

2. Allwood G. Gender-based violence against women in contemporary France: domestic violence and forced marriage policy since the Istanbul Convention. – Modern & Contemporary France. 2016. Vol. 4. No.24. P. 377– 394. DOI: 10.1080/09639489.2016.1203886

3. Bosak M., Vajda M.M. The reality behind the Istanbul convention: Shattering conservative delusions. – Women's Studies International Forum. 2019. Vol. 74. P. 77–83. DOI: 10.1016/j.wsif.2019.03.004

4. Bustelo M. Evaluation from a Gender+ Perspective as a Key Element for (Re)gendering the Policymaking Process. – Journal of Women, Politics & Policy. 2017. Vol. 38. Issue 1. P. 84–101. DOI:10.1080/1554477X.2016.1198211

5. Case M.A. Trans Formations in the Vatican's War on 'Gender Ideology'. – Journal of Women in Culture and Society. University of Chicago Press. 2019. Vol.44. Issue 3. P. 639– 664. DOI:10.1086/701498

6. Cerami C. Turkey, Europe and Women's Rights: The Controversial Debate on the Istanbul Convention. – Nuovi Autoritarismi e Democrazie: Diritto, Istituzioni e Società. 2021. Vol. 3. Issue 1. P. 1–9. DOI: 10.13130/2612-6672/15644

7. Dyadun K.V. Gendernyi podkhod v ugolovnom prave: istoriya i sovremennost' [Gender approach in criminal law: past and present]. – Vserossiiskii kriminologicheskii zhurnal. 2011. No. 1. P. 27–32. (In Russ.)

8. Engeli I., Mazur A. Taking implementation seriously in assessing success: the politics of gender equality policy. – European Journal of Politics and Gender. 2018. Vol. 1. Issue 1. P. 111–129. DOI: 10.1332/251510818X15282097548558

9. Fellegi Z. Proč ratifikovat Istanbulskou úmluvu aneb mezinárodní lidskoprávní smlouvy jako český národní zájem. – České zájmy v roce 2019: Analýzy ÚMV. 2019. P. 110–124.

10. Goncharenko O.K. Stambul''skaya konventsiya: problemy implementatsii spustya 10 let [Istanbul Convention: problems of implementation after a decade]. – Rossiiskaya yustitsiya. 2021. No.6. P.46-51. (In Russ.)

11. Heise L., Ellsberg M., Gottmoeller M. A global overview of gender-based violence. – International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2002. Vol. 78 Suppl. 1. P. 5–14. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7292(02)00038-3

12. Kováts E. The Emergence of Powerful Anti-Gender Movements in Europe and the Crisis of Liberal Democracy. – Gender and Far Right Politics in Europe. Ed. by M. R.Bitzan and A. Petö. Europe. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 2016. P. 175–189. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-43533-6_12

13. Kubrewa J. Gender Mainstreaming in Development. – Research Anthology on Empowering Marginalized Communities and Mitigating Racism and Discrimination. Vol.3. Hershey, PA: IRMA. 2021. P. 870–886. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-8547-4.ch041

14. Neronov, A., Neronova, M. Ponyatiya “gender” v ideologii feminizma: filosofskii analiz [The Concept of Gender in Feminist Ideology: a philosophical analysis]. – Sovremennye issledovaniya sotsial'nykh problem. 2021. Vol.13. No.3. P. 131-154. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.12731/2077-1770-2021-13-3-131-154

15. Oosterveld V. The Definition of “Gender” in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Step Forward or Back for International Criminal Justice? – Harvard Human Rights Journal. 2005. Vol. 18. P. 55-84.

16. Sekowska-Kozlowska K. The Istanbul Convention in Poland. Between the “the war on gender” and legal reform.– International Law and Violence Against Women. Ed. by J. Niemi, L. Peroni and V. Stoyanova. London: Routledge. 2020. P. 259–275.

17. Shishlova E.E. Gender kak innovatsionnyi nauchnyi i filosofskii diskurs [Gender as Innovative Scientific and Philosophical Discourse]. – MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2013. No. 1. P. 148-152. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2013-1-28-148-152

18. Vassileva R. Bulgaria’s Constitutional Troubles with the Istanbul Convention. – Verfassungsblog: On Matters Constitutional. 2018. P. 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17176/20180803-101332-0

19. Volova L.A., Mazaeva N.I. Ponyatie «gender» kak mezhdistsiplinarnyi fenomen (istoriya vozniknoveniya, spetsifika) [The concept of “gender” as an interdisciplinary phenomenon (history of occurrence, specificity)]. – Universitetskie chteniya - 2016. Materialy nauchno-metodicheskikh chtenii PGLU [University readings - 2016. Materials of scientific and methodological readings of PSLU]. Pyatigorsk: PGLU Publ. 2016. P. 6–10. (In Russ.).

20. Voronina O.A. Konstruirovanie i dekonstruktsiya gendera v sovremennom gumanitarnom znanii [Construction and deconstruction of gender in modern humanitarian knowledge]. – Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Sotsiologiya. 2019. No.1. P.5-16. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/2078-7898/2019-1-5-16