THE “AIRCRAFT NATIONALITY” IN INTERNATIONAL LAW

INTRODUCTION. An aircraft bears nationality of the state in which it is registered. This rule was first set in international air law conventions in the beginning of the XX century and it is still effective. At the same time there are no established criteria which the state entitled to put an aircraft in its register should fit. Due to this for the time being, aviation liberalization and deregulation have made it possible for air carriers to use leased aircraft registered in another states, and to adopt common maritime “flags of convenience” practice. This is true for our country, as more than 80% of fleet used at regular passenger flights by major Russian airlines, including the national carrier Aeroflot, is registered outside the Russian Federation. As a result, the meaning of “aircraft nationality” has become rather formalistic. The objective of this research is to study the impact of this situation on the global civil aviation and to search for legal solutions to mitigate possible negative effect thereof. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Study materials include international agreements on civil aviation, primarily Convention on International Civil Aviation of 1944, as well as documents of International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), international conventions on the law of the sea, UN International Court practice and studies of legal scholars. General scientific and private scientific methods of cognition composed methodological basis for the study. RESEARCH RESULTS. In the course of the study the author reveals two approaches to the “aircraft nationality” definition in international law. The first one is based on the notion that aircraft belongs to a state due to the fact of registration. This approach substantiates the idea of exclusive flag state jurisdiction over aircraft, similarly to a state’s jurisdiction over the regions adjoining to its territory (e.g. territorial waters). The second approach provides for the link between a state and an aircraft as the core nature of “nationality”, with registration being merely the confirmation thereof. Consequently, state’s jurisdiction is based on personal principle instead of territorial, which allows states other than flag state, primarily state of operator, to exercise jurisdiction over aircraft. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS. The author concludes that well-established formalistic approach to the “aircraft nationality” together with the exclusive flag state jurisdiction rule have adverse effect on civil aviation in the course of its liberalization and deregulation. The case is not only the economy of single states, but global undermining of uniform compliance by air carriers with international safety standards, as well as impeding or completely eliminating state supervision over aircraft maintenance and aviation security. The author suggests for air law development subject to the concept of “nationality” as the link between a state and an aircraf

state of aircraft registration, “open skies” agreements, “flag of convenience”, “genuine link”, Convention on International Civil Aviation, quasi-territorial jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction, aircraft of the Russian Federation

1. Abeyratne R.I.R. Aviation Security Law. Heidelberg; New York; Dordrecht; London: Springer. 2010. 287 p.

2. Abeyratne R.I.R. Convention on International Civil Aviation: a Commentary. Heidelberg; New York; Dordrecht; London: Springer. 2014. 737 p.

3. Boczek B.A. Flags of Convenience: An International Legal Study. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1962. 354 p.

4. Cheng B. The Law of International Air Transport. London: Stevens. 1962. 231 p.

5. Cogliati-Bantz V.P. Means of Transportation and Registration of Nationality: Transportation Registered by International Organizations. London; New York: Routledge Research in International Law. 2015. 285 p.

6. Cooper J.C. The National Status of Aircraft. – Journal of Air Law and Commerce. 1950. Vol. 17. P. 292–316.

7. Francois J.P.A. Supplementary Report on the Right of International Organizations to Sail Vessels Under their Flags. – Yearbook of International Law Commission. Vol. 2. 1956. P. 102–103.

8. Honig J.P. The Legal Status of Aircraft. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. 1956. 214 p.

9. Huang J. Aviation Safety through the Rule of Law. ICAO’s Mechanisms and Practices. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International. 2009. 256 p.

10. International Human Resource Management: a Case Study Approach: collective monograph. Ed. by D. Wintersberger. London; New York: Kogan Page. 2017. 291 p.

11. Klyuchnikov Yu.V. Vozdukhoplavanie i mezhdunarodnoe pravo [Air Navigation and International Law]. – Yuridicheskii vestnik [Legal Bulletin]. 1916. Book 14. No. 2. P. 144–159. (In Russ.).

12. Korf S.A. Vozdukhoplavanie i mezhdunarodnoe pravo [Air Navigation and International Law]. – Russkaya mysl’ [Russian Opinion]. 1913. Book XII. Part 2. P. 51–72. (In Russ.)

13. Maleev Yu.N. Devyataya «svoboda vozdukha» ili skrytyi kabotazh. [Ninth “Freedom of the Air” or Hidden Cabotage]. – Moscow Journal of International Law. 2017. No. 2 (106). P. 63–70. (In Russ.)

14. Maleev Yu.N. Edinoe regional’noe nebo: kontseptsiya i real’nost’ [United Regional Sky: Concept and Reality]. – Moscow Journal of International Law. 2013. No. 2 (90). P. 59–69. (In Russ.)

15. Maleev Yu.N. Mezhdunarodnoe vozdushnoe pravo: voprosy teorii i praktiki [International Air Law. Matters of Theory and Practice]. Moscow: Mezhdunar. otnosheniya Publ. 1986. 238 p. (In Russ.)

16. McDougal M.S. The Maintenance of Public Order and the Nationality of Ships. – The American Journal of International Law. 1960. Vol. 54. P. 25–116.

17. Mendelsohn A.I. Flags of Convenience: Maritime and Aviation. – Journal of Air Law and Commerce. 2014. Vol. 79. P. 151–159.

18. O’Connel D.P. International Law. In 2 v. Vol. 1. London: Stevens. 1970. 595 p.

19. Shubber S. Jurisdiction over Crimes on Board Aircraft. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. 1973. 369 p.

20. Snodgrass P.D. Aviation Flags of Convenience: Ireland and the Case of Norwegian Airlines International. – Issues in Aviation Law and Policy. 2015. Vol. 14. Issue 2. P. 245–275.

21. Stewart J.T. Lease, Charter and Interchange of Aircraft: a Governmental Perspective. – Akron Law Review. 1980. Vol. 14. Issue 2. P. 187–213.

22. Vejsman R.L. Vozdukhoplavanie v ego otnoshenii k pravu voobshche i k ugolovnomu pravu v osobennosti [Air Navigation and Its Relation to the Law in General and to the Criminal Law in Particular]. – Trudy yuridicheskogo obshchestva pri Imperatorskom S.-Peterburgskom universitete. T. 2: Vtoroe polugodie 1909 g. [Proceedings of the Law Society at the Imperial Saint-Petersburg University. Vol. 2: Second half of 1909]. Saint-Petersburg: Tip. M.M. Stasyulevicha Publ. 1911. P. 90–123 (In Russ.)