OUTER SPACE LAW: RUSSIA – UNITED STATES COMMON CHALLENGES AND PERSPECTIVES

INTRODUCTION. More than fifty years ago, on October 10th, 1967, the entry into force of the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies (“the Outer Space Treaty”) demonstrated the emergence of a new branch of international law: international outer space law (“ISL”). This article considers the contribution of the Russian Federation / U.S.S.R. and the United States and their leading lawyers and diplomats who were able to reach treaty cooperation even during the Cold War, and highlights the main historical legal steps on the way to signing of the Outer Space Treaty. The paper further focuses on the content of the Outer Space Treaty and other sources of ISL, and depicts approaches to interpretation of the treaty provisions with respect to actual legal challenges of space activities’ development, in the context of diverse economic, political and technological factors; as well as on the role of the Outer Space Treaty in the progressive development of ISL. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The theoretical background of this research consists of works of distinguished scholars and specialists in ISL as well as materials of diverse colloquiums, workshops and conferences on ISL. The analytical framework includes the Outer Space Treaty, other relevant international treaties; relevant UN GA resolutions; the 2001 Cape Town Convention and the 2012 Space Protocol; UN, COPUOS (including its subcommittees), ITU and UNIDROIT documents; national space legislation; documents and proceedings of the UNISPACE-III. The research is based on methods such as historical research, formal logic, including analysis, synthesis, analogy and modeling, as well as systematic, comparative and interpretation. RESEARCH RESULTS. Within the context of applicable principles and norms of the Outer Space Treaty, this article specifically provides an analysis of the related provisions of other sources of ISL, as well as unsettled legal issues such as 1) the international legal regime of natural resources of the Moon and other celestial bodies; 2) the use of the outer space solely for peaceful purposes; 3) the legal status of space tourists; 4) the legal regulation of commercial space activities involving a “foreign element” within the framework of the private international law and specifically private international space law (“PISL”); 5) the role of the 2001 Cape Town Convention and the 2012 Space Protocol in the context of international legal regulation of space activities, as well as, provided the entry into force of the Space Protocol, its role as the first specific international legal source of PISL; 6) International system of registration of interests in space assets as the third international system of registration related to space activities; 7) interpretation of Art. VIII of the Outer Space Treaty for the purposes of definition of law applicable to property rights over space objects located in the outer space; 8) “space object” and “space asset” as legal terms; 9) issues of international responsibility and liability, as well as extension of the scope of the concept of the “launching State”, including a proposal on addition of a potential fifth category; 10) registration and control; 11) International Space Station in the relevant legal framework; 12) ways of reaching of due relevance of international legal consequences for states resulted from the change of private law relations to the factual “participation” of the involved states in the corresponding space activities. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS. After discussing the issues noted above, this paper concludes that: 1) it is in the interest of the Russian Federation, the United States of America and other space powers to consider the role of the Outer Space Treaty as the basis for further progressive development of ISL and inter alia for orderly development of commercial space activities; 2) some burning issues of ISL, as well as other related legal challenges, can be resolved by an authentic interpretation of Outer Space Treaty provisions (e.g. by adding other specific protocols to it, or by means of a universal comprehensive convention on international space law); 3) it is important to take into account both the distinction of subject matter, as well as the relationship and interaction between diverse applicable sources and branches of international law and also relevant national legislation regarding the search for solutions of space related legal issues noted above. In sum, one needs to follow a comprehensive inclusive and coherent approach, involving science diplomacy.

the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, international space law, UN treaties on Outer Space, Outer Space, space object, international responsibility and liability, concept of the “launching state”, international legal regime of natural resources of the Moon and other celestial bodies, space resources, International Space Station, commercial space activities, the 2001 Cape Town Convention, the 2012 Space Protocol, international registration system for space assets, international interest, space asset, private international space law, uniform comprehensive convention on international space law

1. Brisibe T.C. 2013. A Normative System for Outer Space Activities in the Next Half Century. – Proceedings of the IISL 2011. 56th Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space. P. 3–28.

2. Cheng B. 1968. Le Traité de 1967 sur l’espace. – Journal du droit international. No. 3. P. 533–645.

3. Cheng B. 1997. Studies in International Space Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 798 p.

4. Doyle S.E. 2011. A Concise History of Space Law: 1910– 2009 (The Nandasiri Jesentuliyana Keynote Lectures). – New Perspectives on Space Law. Proceedings of the 53rd IISL Colloquium on The Law of Outer Space, Young Scholars Session, 2010. Ed. by Mark J. Sundahl and V. Gopalakrishnan. P. 1–24. URL: http://iislwebo.wwwnlss1.a2hosted. com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/NewPerspectivesonSpaceLaw.pdf (accessed date: 01.03.2018).

5. Estrella Faria J.A. 2017. Towards the Establishment of the International Registry of Secured Interests in Space Objects: The Space Protocol to the Cape Town Convention and Rail Protocol. – United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space, Scientific and Technical Subcommittee, Fifty-fourth session, Vienna, 30 January–10 February 2017. 20 p. URL: http://www.unoosa.org/documents/pdf/copuos/stsc/2017/tech-23E.pdf (accessed date: 01.03.2018).

6. Galloway E. 2000. Commentary Paper to the Existing United Nations Treaties: Strength and Needs (Session 1) – Proceedings of the Workshop on Space Law in the Twentyfirst Century, UNISPACE IIII Technical Forum, Vienna, Austria, July 1999. UN Doc. ST/SPACE/2. P. 24–28. URL:http:// www.unoosa.org/res/oosadoc/data/documents/2000/ stspace/stspace2_0_html/st_space_02E.pdf (accessed date: 01.03.2018).

7. Goode R. 2002. The Cape Town Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment: A Driving Force for International Asset-Based Financing. – Uniform Law Review. No. 1. P. 3–15.

8. Goode R. 2013. The Treatment of Intangible Assets under the Cape Town Convention and Protocols. – Cape Town Convention Journal. No. 1. P. 43–49.

9. Jankowitsch P. 2015. The Background and History of Space Law. – Handbook of Space Law. Ed. by Frans von der Dunk with Fabio Tronchetti. Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing. P. 1–28.

10. Kolosov Yu.M. 1979. Vstupitel’naya stat’ya [Opening Article]. – Nozari F. Kosmicheskoe pravo [Space Law]. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literaturа Publ. P. 7–39. (In Russ.)

11. Kolosov Yu.M. 2000. Commentary Paper to the Existing United Nations Treaties: Strength and Needs (Session 1). – Proceedings of the Workshop on Space Law in the Twenty-first Century, UNISPACE IIII Technical Forum, Vienna, Austria, July 1999. UN Doc. ST/SPACE/2. P. 30–32. URL: http://www.unoosa.org/res/oosadoc/data/documents/2000/stspace/stspace2_0_html/st_space_02E. pdf (accessed date: 01.03.2018).

12. Kolosov Yu.M. 2014. Bor’ba za mirnyi kosmos. 2-e izd. [Striving for Peaceful Outer Space. 2nd ed.]. Moscow: Statut Publ. 128 p. (In Russ.)

13. Kolosov Yu.M. 2014. Otvetstvennost’ v mezhdunarodnom prave. 2-e izd. [Responsibility and Liability in International Law. 2nd ed.]. Moscow: Statut Publ. 224 p. (In Russ.)

14. Kolosov Yu.M., Yuzbashyan M.R. Vklad rossiiskoi (sovetskoi) yurisprudentsii v stanovlenie i razvitie mezhdunarodnogo kosmicheskogo prava [Contribution of Russian (Soviet) Jurisprudence to Formation and Development of International Space Law]. – Moscow Journal of International Law. 2015. No. 2(98). P. 12–32. (In Russ.)

15. Kopal V. 2000. Discussion paper to the Existing United Nations Treaties: Strength and Needs (Session 1). – Proceedings of the Workshop on Space Law in the Twenty-first Century, UNISPACE IIII Technical Forum, Vienna, Austria, July 1999. UN Doc. ST/SPACE/2. P. 11–18. URL: http:// www.unoosa.org/res/oosadoc/data/documents/2000/ stspace/stspace2_0_html/st_space_02E.pdf (accessed date: 01.03.2018).

16. Kopal V. 2003. Introduction to the United Nations Treaties and principles on Outer Space. – Proceedings of the United Nations/International Institute of Air and Space Law Workshop on Capacity Building in Space Law (2002). UN Doc. ST/SPACE/14. P. 10–24. URL: http://www.unoosa.org/res/oosadoc/data/documents/2003/stspace/ stspace14_0_html/st_space_14E.pdf (accessed date: 01.03.2018).

17. Kopal V. 2006. International Legal Regime on Outer Space: Outer Space Treaty, Rescue Agreement and the Moon Agreement. – Proceedings of the United Nations/ Nigeria Workshop on Space Law: Meeting International Responsibility and Addressing Domestic Needs, Abuja, 21-24 November 2005, United Nations. UN Publication ST/SPACE/32. P. 8–17. URL: http://www.unoosa.org/ pdf/publications/st_space_32E.pdf (accessed date: 01.03.2018).

18. Kopal V. 2008. Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies. – United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law. 10 p. URL: http://legal.un.org/avl/pdf/ha/tos/tos_e.pdf (accessed date: 01.03.2018).

19. Koroma A.G. 2012. The Development of International Law and the Peaceful Uses for Outer Space. – Proceedings of the IISL 2011. 54th Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space. P. 3–20.

20. Schrogl K.-U. 2016. Space Law and Diplomacy. – 8th Nandasiri Jasentuliyana Keynote Lecture. 14 p. URL: http:// www.iislweb.org/docs/2016keynote.pdf (accessed date: 01.03.2018).

21. Stanford M.J. 2012. The Availability of a New Form of Financing for Commercial Space Activities: The Extension of the Cape Town Convention to Space Assets. – Cape Town Convention Journal. No. 1. P. 109–123.

22. Vereshchetin V.S. 1977. Mezhdunarodnoe sotrudnichestvo v kosmose. Pravovye voprosy [International Cooperation in the Outer Space: legal issues]. Moscow: Nauka Publ. 264 p. (In Russ.)

23. Vereshchetin V.S. 2010. The Law of Outer Space in the General Legal Field (Commonality and Particularities). – Revista Brasileira de Direito Aeronáutico e Espacial. Abril. P. 42–49.

24. Vereshchetin V.S. [et al.]. 1991. Pravovoe regulirovanie poletov cheloveka v kosmos (Opyt mezhdunarodnogo sotrudnichestva uchenykh) [Legal Regulation of Human Space Flights (Scholars’ International Cooperation Experience)] – Sovetskii zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava, No. 1. P. 76–81. (In Russ.)

25. Von der Dunk F.G. 2007. Space for Tourism? Legal Aspects of Private Spaceflight for Tourist Purpose. – Proceedings of the 49th Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space (2006). Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. P. 18–28.

26. Vylegzhanin A.N., Yuzbashyan M.R. 2011. Kosmos v mezhdunarodno-pravovom kontekste [Space in the International Law Context]. – Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. No. 3 (27). P. 18–30. (In Russ.)

27. Yuzbashyan M. 2011. Potential Uniform International Legal Framework for Regulation of Private Space Activities. – New Perspectives on Space Law. Proceedings of the 53rd IISL Colloquium on The Law of Outer Space, Young Scholars Session, 2010. Ed. by Mark J. Sundahl and V. Gopalakrishnan. P. 70–83. URL: http://iislwebo.wwwnlss1. a2hosted.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/NewPerspectivesonSpaceLaw.pdf (accessed date: 04.03.2018)

28. Yuzbashyan M. 2013. Interaction between Diverse Sources of Law Applicable to Legal Challenges Caused by Commercial Space Activities. – Proceedings of the IISL 2012. 55th Colloquium on The Law of Outer Space. P. 74–92.

29. Yuzbashyan M.R. 2017a. Novelly Keiptaunskoi konventsii 2001 g. i Kosmicheskogo protokola 2012 g. v kontekste mezhdunarodno-pravovogo regulirovaniya kosmicheskoi deyatel’nosti [Novelties of the 2001 Cape Town Convention and the 2012 Space Protocol from the Perspective of International Legal Framework for Regulation of Space Activities]. – Evraziiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal. No. 9 (112). P. 38–41. (In Russ.)

30. Yuzbashyan M.R. 2017b. Zakon SShA ob issledovanii i ispol’zovanii kosmicheskikh resursov 2015 g. i mezhdunarodnoe kosmicheskoe pravo [The US Space Resource Exploration and Utilization Act of 2015 and the International Space Law]. – Moscow Journal of International Law. No. 2(106). P. 71–86. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24833/0869-0049-2017-2-106-71-86

31. Zhukov G.P. 1966. Kosmicheskoe pravo [Space Law]. Moscow: Mezhdunar. otnosheniya Publ. 296 p. (In Russ.)

32. Zhukov G.P. 2008. 40 let dogovoru o printsipakh deyatel’nosti gosudarstv po issledovaniyu i ispol’zovaniyu kosmicheskogo prostranstva, vklyuchaya Lunu i drugie nebesnye telatela [40 Years Anniversary of the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies]. – Rossiiskii ezhegodnik mezhdunarodnogo prava. 2007 [Russian Yearbook of International law. 2007]. Saint-Petersburg: SKF “Rossiya - Neva” Publ. P. 195–216. (In Russ.)