Norwegian State Practice and the Treaty Relating to Spitsbergen (Current International Law Issues)
https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2016-3-95-103
Abstract
The author reviews the key international legal actions undertaken by Norway since 1977 in avoidance of the Treaty of 9 February 1920 relating to Spitsbergen (hereinafter - “Spitsbergen Treaty”), as well as their significance in terms of spatial extension of the sovereign rights of Norway in the Arctic. It is highlighted that Norway’s policy is based on restrictive interpretation of the Spitsbergen Treaty and replacement of its specifically created status of Spitsbergen by UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. In this connection the author analyses foreign doctrine, legal precedents, which all deny unequivocal application of restrictive approach to interpretation of a treaty, in disregard of its object and purpose. The article considers an “alternative” legal argument of Norway which asserts that Norway’s sovereignty over Spitsbergen has arisen and is currently effective by virtue of the customary law; the above argument is also set aside with reference to legal and factual counterarguments. The author concludes that applicable sources of international law challenge legality of actions that Norway is undertaking, as a result of which Norway’s legal position requires substantive improvement and affirmation.
About the Author
Vera M. Savva
Expert Council on the Arctic and Antarctic under the Chairman of the Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Вылегжанин А.Н., Зиланов В.К. Шпицберген: правовой режим прилегающих морских районов. М.: СОПС, 2006. С. 35-83.
2. A. Vylegzhanin, V. Zilanov. Spitsbergen. Legal Regime of Adjacent Marine Areas. Ed. and translated by W. Butler. Eleven International Publishing. The Netherlands. 2007. P. 27.
3. Вылегжанин А.Н. Вопросы толкования и исполнения Договора о Шпицбергене 1920 года // Московский журнал международного права. - 2010. - N 1.
4. Сборник нормативных актов. СССР-Норвегия: сотрудничество в области рыбного хозяйства. Науч. ред. В.А. Косенков, Т.И. Спивакова. - М.: ВНИРО. 1988. С. 97-99.
5. Agreement between the Government of the Kingdom of Norway on the one hand, and the Government of the Kingdom of Denmark together with the Home Rule Government of Greenland on the other hand, concerning the delimitation of the continental shelf and the fisheries zones in the area between Greenland and Svalbard (with chart). Copenhagen, 20 February 2006. / Law of the Sea Bulletin No.75, United Nations, New York, 2010. Р. 18-20 [Электронный ресурс] // Режим доступа: http://www.un.org/Depts/los/doalos_publications/LOSBulletins/bulletinpdf/bulletin75e.pdf - Дата обращения 06.09.2016.
6. Договор между Российской Федерацией и Королевством Норвегия о разграничении морских пространств и сотрудничестве в Баренцевом море и Северном Ледовитом океане, 15 сентября 2010 г. [Электронный ресурс] // Режим доступа: http://kremlin.ru/supplement/707 - Дата обращения 06.09.2016. Карта-схема [Электронный ресурс] // Режим доступа: :https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/UD/Vedlegg/Folkerett/100914_Kartskisse_final.pdf - Дата обращения 06.09.2016.
7. Continental shelf submission of Norway in respect of areas in the Arctic Ocean, the Barents Sea and the Norwegian Sea, Executive Summary; Summary of the recommendations of the Commission on the limits of the continental shelf […], 27 March 2009. [Электронный ресурс] // Режим доступа: http://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/submission_nor.htm - Дата обращения 06.09.2016.
8. D.H. Anderson, The Status Under International Law of the Maritime Areas Around Svalbard // Ocean Development & International Law. 40. 2009. P.377-378.
9. Norwegian Petroleum Directorate: 23rd licensing round - announcement. 20.01.2015 [Электронный ресурс] // Режим доступа: http://www.npd.no/en/Topics/Production-licences/Theme-articles/Licensing-rounds/23rd-Licencing-round/Announcement/ - Дата обращения 06.09.2016.
10. Презентация Eric J. Molenaar «Arctic Fishing», подготовленную в рамках семинара по теме «The EU and the Arctic. Workshop 3: The Maritime Dimension of the Arctic». Reykjavik. 24 June 2015. P.13, 15. [Электронный ресурс] // Режим доступа: http://www.uu.nl/sites/default/files/rebo-rgl-molenaar-arctic-fishing-150624.pdf - Дата обращения 06.09.2016.
11. T. Pedersen. The Dynamics of Svalbard Diplomacy // Diplomacy and Statecraft. 19. 2008. P. 236-262.
12. Adam Grydehøj. Informal Diplomacy in Norway’s Svalbard Policy: The Intersection of Local Community Development and Arctic International Relations // Global Change, Peace & Security. 26(1). 2013.
13. Allan Sande. Oil Drilling & Ecosystem Management Planning of the Barents Sea. Briefing Note // Arctic Yearbook. 2014. P.2.
14. Ø. Jensen. The Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf: An Administrative, Scientific, or Judicial Institution? // Ocean Development & International Law. 45:2. 2014. P. 171-185.
15. T.L. McDorman. “The Role of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf: A Technical Body in a Political World // International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 17. 2002. P. 301-324.
16. Вылегжанин А.Н., Молодцова Е.С.,Дудыкина И.П. Зарубежные исследования права, применимого к отграничению (delineation) и разграничению (delimitation) арктического шельфа // Московский журнал международного права. - №3. - 2015. - С.9-11.
17. T. Pedersen, T. Henriksen Svalbard’s Maritime Zones: The End of Legal Uncertainty? // The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law. Vol. 24. 2009. P. 151.
18. Предложения к «Дорожной карте» развития международно-правовых основ сотрудничества России в Арктике: рабочая тетрадь. № VI. РСМД. Москва, 2013. С. 31-32.
19. T. Pedersen. The Dynamics of Svalbard Diplomacy // Diplomacy and Statecraft. 19. 2008. P. 255.
20. Case concerning the territorial dispute (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya/Chad), Judgement (par.41), 1994.
21. Oil Platform Case (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America), Preliminary Objection (par.23), 1996.
22. https://www.regjeringen.no/en/find-document/dep/JD/reports-to-the-storting/19992000/report-no-9-to-the-storting-/4/id456892/ - Дата обращения 06.09.2016.
23. D.H. Anderson, The Status Under International Law of the Maritime Areas Around Svalbard // Ocean Development & International Law. 40. P. 379-380.
24. A.D. McNair, Law of Treaties. Clarendon Press, 1961. P. 765.
25. D.H. Anderson, The Status Under International Law of the Maritime Areas Around Svalbard // Ocean Development & International Law. 40. P. 379.
26. Lake Lanoux Arbitration (France v. Spain). Award, 16 November 1957. P. 16 [Электронный ресурс] // Режим доступа: http://www.ecolex.org/server2.php/libcat/docs/COU/Full/En/COU-143747E.pdf - Дата обращения 06.09.2016.
27. Iron Rhine Arbitration (Belgium v. Netherlands). Award, 24 May 2005. Reports of International Arbitral Awards, Volume XXVII; United Nations, 2008. P. 65 [Электронный ресурс] // Режим доступа: http://legal.un.org/riaa/cases/vol_XXVII/35-125.pdf - Дата обращения 06.09.2016.
28. R. Churchill, G. Ulfstein. Marine Management in Disputed Areas; The. Case of the Barents Sea. Routledge, London and New York 1992. C.23-25.
29. D.H. Anderson, The Status Under International Law of the Maritime Areas Around Svalbard // Ocean Development & International Law. 40. P. 380.
30. A.D. McNair, Law of Treaties. Clarendon Press, 1961. P. 365.
31. D.H. Anderson. The Status Under International Law of the Maritime Areas Around Svalbard // Ocean Development & International Law. 40. P. 380.
32. Report No.9 to the Storting (1999-2000). Svalbard. Par.4.1.1 (The Treaty and Norway's exercise of authority). [Электронный ресурс] // Режим доступа: https://www.regjeringen.no/en/find-document/dep/JD/reports-to-the-storting/19992000/report-no-9-to-the-storting-/4/id456892/ - Дата обращения 06.09.2016.
Review
For citations:
Savva V.M. Norwegian State Practice and the Treaty Relating to Spitsbergen (Current International Law Issues). Moscow Journal of International Law. 2016;(3):95-103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2016-3-95-103
Views:
1077
Email this article 