International Legal Protection of Animals: Problems and Prospects

INTRODUCTION. The purpose of this work is to identify the main problems of modern international legal protection of animals and the theoretical justification of the need to change their legal status (regime). The main task of the research is to study modern concepts that have already become the basis of international legal acts for the protection of various categories of animals, as well as ideas that have sufficient potential to lay the foundation for a more conscious attitude to other biological species. Furthermore, the research highlights significant shortcomings of the global legal policy on animal protection, which hinder the achievement of the main goals of international cooperation in this area. The research also suggests new approaches that can solve both ethical and environmental problems of human-animal relationships in the very near future. In addition, this scientific work provides various philosophical and legal arguments that confirm the need to assign a special legal status to animals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. The research examines the doctrinal positions of mainly foreign researchers and legal experts dealing with the problems of international legal protection of animals. This study uses the norms of some international legal agreements of a global and regional nature, as well as the provisions of recommendation documents. The research used general theoretical (analysis, synthesis, comparison, induction, deduction, abstraction, generalization, idealization, analogy, modeling, concretization, logical, systematic and comparative approaches) and special legal methods (historical-legal, formal-legal and the method of legal forecasting).

RESEARCH RESULTS. Based on the results of the study, the author identifies the main problems of international legal regulation of relations on the conservation of biodiversity in the framework of the implementation of the concepts of environmental protection and sustainable development. In addition, the study highlights the most important achievements and significant gaps in the EU's legal policy on animal welfare. Through the synthesis and generalization of the main provisions of the concept of well-being and the concept of animal rights, this scientific work forms an idea of the most successful model of international legal protection of animals. Based on the obtained result, the study predicts the inevitable change in their legal status (regime) and the revision of the existing anthropocentric paradigm of modern legal science.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS. The vast majority of existing international legal agreements on the protection and use of animals protect the secondary interests of modern consumer society, where animals have a rank based on their usefulness, without taking into account their immanent value. If the trends of recent decades continue, the environmental goals set by international environmental law will remain unattainable. In order to solve a layer of ethical and environmental problems, it is necessary to abandon the anthropocentric approach, which permeates the entire system of international law, in favor of a more perfect organization of human relations with nature (for example, in favor of anthropocosmocentrism, cosmocentrism, biocentrism, etc.). In addition, the identification of animals with property does not correspond to modern ideas about them as sentient beings. It is unacceptable to treat them as «things» within the framework of national legal systems and international law. Regardless of whether they will have legal capacity or will lead a new, specific category of persons, animals must have a certain set of international legal guarantees.

1. Avdeeva I.A. Transformatsiya gumanizma: ot antropotsentrizma k biotsentrizmu v kontekste postroeniya novykh printsipov otnosheniya cheloveka k zhivotnym [Transformation of humanism: from anthropocentrism to biocentrism in the context of building new principles of humananimal relations]. – Filosofiya i obshchestvo. 2018. No. 3. P. S. 66–82. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.30884/jfio/2018.03.05

2. Bentham J. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (Russ. ed: Bentham J. Vvedenie v osnovaniya nravstvennosti i zakonodatel'stva. Moscow: ROSSPEN Publ. 1998. 415 p.)

3. Brożek B. The Troublesome “Person”. – Legal Personhood: Animals, Artificial Intelligence and the Unborn. Law and Philosophy Library. Vol. 119. Cham: Springer. 2017. P. 3–13. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-53462-6_1

4. Cardozo E.D. The Legal Guardianship of Animals. 3rd ed. Belo Horizonte: Minas Gerais. 2020. 346 p.

5. Chirkin V.E. Yuridicheskoe litso publichnogo prava: monografiya [Legal entity of public law: a monograph]. Moscow: Norma Publ. 2007. 352 p. (In Russ.)

6. Duncan I.J.H., Fraser D. Understanding animal welfare. – Animal Welfare. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publ. 1997. P. 19–31.

7. Favre D. An International Treaty for Animal Welfare. – Animal Law and Welfare – International Perspectives. Vol. 53. Cham: Springer. 2016. P. 87–106. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319- 26818-7_5

8. Futhazar G. Biodiversity, Species Protection, and Animal Welfare Under International Law. – Studies in Global Animal Law. 2020. Vol. 290. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer. P. 109-120. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-60756-5_10

9. Korotkii T.R., Zubchenko N.I. Obespechenie blagopoluchiya zhivotnykh i ikh zashchita ot zhestokogo obrashcheniya: ot eticheskikh norm k mezhdunarodno-pravovomu regulirovaniyu [Ensuring the welfare of animals and their protection from cruelty: from ethical standards to international legal regulation]. – Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii. 2014. No. 3. P. 361–372. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2014.3.12522

10. Kurki V.A.J. Why Things Can Hold Rights: Reconceptualizing the Legal Person. – Legal Personhood: Animals, Artificial Intelligence and the Unborn. Vol.119. Cham: Springer. 2017. P. 69–89. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-53462-6_5

11. Kuznetsova M.F. Printsip antropokosmotsentrizma v kontseptsii ustoichivogo razvitiya obshchestva [The principle of anthropocentrism in the concept of sustainable development of society]. – Vestnik KGPU im. V. P. Astaf'eva. 2012. No. 1. P. 214–217. (In Russ.)

12. Laptev V.A. Ponyatie iskusstvennogo intellekta i yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' za ego rabotu [Artificial Intelligence and Liability for its Work]. – Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki. 2019. No. 2. P. 79–102. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17-323/2072-8166.2019.2.79.102

13. Peters A. Toward International Animal Rights. – Studies in Global Animal Law. Vol. 290. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer. 2020. P. 109-120. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-60756-5_10

14. Pietrzykowski T. The Idea of Non-personal Subjects of Law. – Legal Personhood: Animals, Artificial Intelligence and the Unborn. Vol. 119. Cham: Springer. 2017. P. 49–67. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-53462-6_4

15. Regan T. A case for animal rights. – Advances in animal welfare science. Ed. by M.W. Fox and L. Mickley, Washington, DC: The Humane Society of the United States. 1986. P. 179–189.

16. Rousseau J-J. Ob obshchestvennom dogovore. Traktaty [The Social Contract. Treatises]. Moscow: KANON-press Publ. 1998. 416 p. (In Russ.)

17. Shaw M. International law. 6th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2008. 1542 p.

18. Singer P. Animal Liberation. 2nd ed. New York: Avon Books. 1990. 320 p.

19. Stucki S. Towards a Theory of Legal Animal Rights: Simple and Fundamental Rights. – Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2020. Vol. 40. Issue 3. P. 533–560. DOI: 10.1093/ojls/ gqaa007

20. Tkachenko S.V. Rimskoe pravo v Rossii: monografiya [Roman law in Russia: a monograph]. Moscow: SGA Publ. 2009. 204 p. (In Russ.)

21. Zubchenko N.I. K voprosu o sootnoshenii ponyatii “blagopoluchie zhivotnykh” i “zashchita zhivotnykh ot zhestokogo obrashcheniya” v mezhdunarodnom prave [On the relation between the definitions of “animal welfare” and “protection of animals from cruelty” in international law]. – Aktual'nі problemi polіtiki. No. 52. Odessa: NU “OYuA”. 2014. P. 135–145. (In Russ.)