<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">mgimolaw</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Московский журнал международного права</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Moscow Journal of International Law</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0869-0049</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2619-0893</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Moscow State Institute of International Relations</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24833/0869-0049-2010-2-48-69</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">mgimolaw-787</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>МЕЖДУНАРОДНОЕ ЧАСТНОЕ И ГРАЖДАНСКОЕ ПРАВО</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE AND CIVIL LAW</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Сверхимперативные нормы: различные теории, объясняющие механизм их применения</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Internationally Mandatory Rules: Different Theories Explaining the Mechanism of their Application (Part II)</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Асосков</surname><given-names>А. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Asoskov</surname><given-names>A. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Асосков Антон Владимирович - к.ю.н., магистр частного права, доцент кафедры гражданского права юридического факультета;</p><p> арбитр МКАС при ТПП РФ</p><p>119991, ГСП-1, Москва, Ленинские горы</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Anton V. Asoskov – Ph.D. in Law, master of private law, assistant professor at the Chair of Civil Law, Faculty of Law;</p><p>Arbitrator in ICAC</p><p>Office No.745, MSU, Uchebniy Korpus 1, Leninskiye Gory, Moscow  119991</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>МГУ им. М.В. Ломоносова</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Moscow State University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2010</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>06</month><year>2010</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>48</fpage><lpage>69</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Асосков А.В., 2010</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2010</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Асосков А.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Asoskov A.V.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.mjil.ru/jour/article/view/787">https://www.mjil.ru/jour/article/view/787</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье рассматриваются различные теории, которые были предложены в западноевропейской литературе для объяснения института сверхимперативных норм (ст. 1192 Гражданского кодекса РФ). Подробно проанализированы содержание, преимущества и недостатки теории строго территориального характера публично-правовых норм, теории специальной связи, теории применения сверхимперативных норм договорного статута, теории учета сверхимперативных норм в качестве фактических обстоятельств дела, а также теории специальных двусторонних коллизионных норм. В статье отмечается нецелесообразность использования различных критериев для определения возможности принятия во внимание сверхимперативных норм иностранного договорного статута, с одной стороны, и сверхимперативных норм третьих стран, с другой стороны. Делается вывод о том, что наиболее перспективными являются теория специальной связи и теория учета сверхимперативных норм в качестве фактических обстоятельств дела, а также сочетание данных теорий, которое предполагает возможность постановки вопроса о применении той или иной иностранной сверхимперативной нормы последовательно на двух различных уровнях – уровне международного частного права и материально-правовом уровне.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article examines different theories, which were proposed in Western European literature for explanation of the notion of internationally mandatory rules (art. 1192 of Russian Civil Code). The content, advantages and disadvantages of the following theories are analyzed: theory of strictly territorial application of public law rules, special connection theory, theory of the proper law of contract, theory of taking internationally mandatory rules into consideration as facts of the case, as well as theory of special multilateral conflict of law rules.The author does not recommend using different criteria in order to determine the opportunity of taking into consideration the internationally mandatory rules of lex contractus, on the one hand, and internationally mandatory rules of third states, on the other hand. The author comes to the conclusion that the most promising are the special connection theory and theory of taking internationally mandatory rules into consideration as facts of the case, as well as their combination, which means the opportunity of application of this or that internationally mandatory rule on two consecutive levels – level of international private law and substantive law level.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>сверхимперативные нормы</kwd><kwd>нормы непосредственного применения</kwd><kwd>договорный статут</kwd><kwd>Римская конвенция 1980г. о праве</kwd><kwd>применимом к договорным обязательствам</kwd><kwd>Регламент ЕС Рим I о праве</kwd><kwd>применимом к договорным обязательствам</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>internationally mandatory rules</kwd><kwd>rules of immediate application</kwd><kwd>lex contractus</kwd><kwd>1980 Rome Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations</kwd><kwd>Rome I EC Regulation on the law applicable to contractual obligations</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Брун М.И. Публичный порядок в МЧП. Петроград, 1916. –97 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Брун М.И. Публичный порядок в МЧП. Петроград, 1916. –97 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лунц Л.А. Курс международного частного права: в 3 тт. М., 2002. –1007 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Лунц Л.А. Курс международного частного права: в 3 тт. М., 2002. –1007 c.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Узойкин Д.А. Валютные сделки, лишенные исковой силы // Законодательство. 2001. № 8.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Узойкин Д.А. Валютные сделки, лишенные исковой силы // Законодательство. 2001. № 8.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Эбке В. Международное валютное право. Пер.с нем. М., 1997. –332 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Эбке В. Международное валютное право. Пер.с нем. М., 1997. –332 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Basedow J. Conflicts of Economic Regulation // Am. J. Comp. L. 1994. Vol. 42. P. 423-447.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Basedow J. Conflicts of Economic Regulation // Am. J. Comp. L. 1994. Vol. 42. P. 423-447.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bonomi A. Mandatory Rules in Private International Law. The quest for uniformity of decisions in a global environment // Yearbook of Private International Law. Vol.I. 1999. P. P. 215-247.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bonomi A. Mandatory Rules in Private International Law. The quest for uniformity of decisions in a global environment // Yearbook of Private International Law. Vol.I. 1999. P. P. 215-247.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fawcett J. A United Kingdom Perspective on the Rome I Regulation. // La Nuova Disciplina Comunitaria della Legge Applicabile ai Contratti (Roma I). Ed. N. Boschiero. 2009. P. 191-224.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fawcett J. A United Kingdom Perspective on the Rome I Regulation. // La Nuova Disciplina Comunitaria della Legge Applicabile ai Contratti (Roma I). Ed. N. Boschiero. 2009. P. 191-224.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Honsell H., Vogt N., Schnyder A., Berti St. Internationales Privatrecht. 2. Auflage. 2007. ß 1975 S.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Honsell H., Vogt N., Schnyder A., Berti St. Internationales Privatrecht. 2. Auflage. 2007. ß 1975 S.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Internationales Vertragsrecht. Das internationale Privatrecht der Schuldverträge. Hrsg. Christoph Reithmann, Dieter Martiny. 7. Auflage. 2010. –2179 S.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Internationales Vertragsrecht. Das internationale Privatrecht der Schuldverträge. Hrsg. Christoph Reithmann, Dieter Martiny. 7. Auflage. 2010. –2179 S.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kaye P. The New Private International Law of Contract of the European Community. Implementation of the EEC’s Contractual Obligations Convention in England and Wales under the Contracts (Applicable Law) Act 1990. 1993. – 515 P.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kaye P. The New Private International Law of Contract of the European Community. Implementation of the EEC’s Contractual Obligations Convention in England and Wales under the Contracts (Applicable Law) Act 1990. 1993. – 515 P.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kegel G., Schurig Kl. Internationales Privatrecht: ein Studienbuch. 9. Aufl. 2004. – 1190 S.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kegel G., Schurig Kl. Internationales Privatrecht: ein Studienbuch. 9. Aufl. 2004. – 1190 S.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kunda I. Internationally Mandatory Rules of a Third Country in European Contract Conflict of Laws. The Rome Convention and the Proposed Rome I Regulation. 2007. – 402 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kunda I. Internationally Mandatory Rules of a Third Country in European Contract Conflict of Laws. The Rome Convention and the Proposed Rome I Regulation. 2007. – 402 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Proctor Ch. Mann on the Legal Aspect of Money. 6th ed. 2005. – 831 P.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Proctor Ch. Mann on the Legal Aspect of Money. 6th ed. 2005. – 831 P.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schweizerisches Privatrecht. Band XI. Internationales Privatrecht. Hrsg. D. Girsberger. Teilband 1. Allgemeine Lehren. A. Furrer, D. Girsberger, K. Siehr. 2008. – 395 S.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schweizerisches Privatrecht. Band XI. Internationales Privatrecht. Hrsg. D. Girsberger. Teilband 1. Allgemeine Lehren. A. Furrer, D. Girsberger, K. Siehr. 2008. – 395 S.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Siehr K. Ausländische Eingriffsnormen im inländischen Wirtschaftskollisionsrecht // RabelsZ. 1988. Band 52. S. 41-103.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Siehr K. Ausländische Eingriffsnormen im inländischen Wirtschaftskollisionsrecht // RabelsZ. 1988. Band 52. S. 41-103.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Siehr K. Das Internationale Privatrecht der Schweiz. 2002. – 797 S.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Siehr K. Das Internationale Privatrecht der Schweiz. 2002. – 797 S.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vischer Fr. Connecting factors / International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law. Vol. III Private International Law. Chief Ed. K. Lipstein. Chapter 4. 1999.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vischer Fr. Connecting factors / International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law. Vol. III Private International Law. Chief Ed. K. Lipstein. Chapter 4. 1999.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vischer Fr. General Course on Private International Law // Recueil des Cours / Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law. Vol. 232. 1992-I. P. 9-256.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vischer Fr. General Course on Private International Law // Recueil des Cours / Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law. Vol. 232. 1992-I. P. 9-256.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">von Bar Chr., Mankowski P. Internationales Privatrecht. Band I. Allgemeine Lehren. 2. Auflage. 2003. – 745 S.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">von Bar Chr., Mankowski P. Internationales Privatrecht. Band I. Allgemeine Lehren. 2. Auflage. 2003. – 745 S.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zeppenfeld M. Die allseitige Anknüpfung von Eingriffsnormen im internationalen Wirtscaftsrecht. 2001. – 186 S.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zeppenfeld M. Die allseitige Anknüpfung von Eingriffsnormen im internationalen Wirtscaftsrecht. 2001. – 186 S.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
