<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">mgimolaw</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Московский журнал международного права</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Moscow Journal of International Law</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0869-0049</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2619-0893</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Moscow State Institute of International Relations</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24833/0869-0049-2014-4-56-77</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">mgimolaw-51</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>МЕЖДУНАРОДНО-ПРАВОВЫЕ ВОПРОСЫ ТЕРРИТОРИИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ISSUES OF TERRITORY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Принцип uti possidetis: история зарождения</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Historical Background of the Principle uti possidetis juris</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Мирзаев</surname><given-names>Фархад Сабир</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Mirzayev</surname><given-names>Farhad Sabir</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">noemail@neicon.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>МГИМО (У) МИД России</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>MGIMO-University MFA Russia</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2014</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>12</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>96</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>56</fpage><lpage>77</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Мирзаев Ф.С., 2014</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Мирзаев Ф.С.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Mirzayev F.S.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.mjil.ru/jour/article/view/51">https://www.mjil.ru/jour/article/view/51</self-uri><abstract><p>Принцип uti possidetis, происходящий из римского гражданского права, изначально предназначался для сохранения статус-кво во владении имуществом. Из правила римского права uti possidetis взошел на уровень принципа международного права, имеющего значение для решения вопросов территориального суверенитета, с учетом, особенно, практики межгосударственного территориального размежевания в XVIII-XIX веках в Латинской Америке, а затем в Африке и в Азии. В статье показано, что принцип uti possidetis juris является специфичным механизмом в функционировании международного права.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The foregoing analysis argues that uti possidetis ’ originates from jus civile of Roman Law. The principle’s main purpose in Roman Law was the preserving of the status quo and stability of property possession. From the rule of private Roman Law uti possidetis transformed into a principle of international law dealing with state or territorial sovereignty issues. Only in the 18-19th centuries it became a principle of interstate relations in Latin America and then in African and Asian continents. It is argued that the principle of uti possidetis juris is a speciﬁ c mechanism and process of international law, which serves for the purposes of transferring the sovereignty from preceding sovereign to the new state.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>uti possidetis</kwd><kwd>трансформация бывших админис- тративных линий разграничения в международные границы</kwd><kwd>принцип международного права</kwd><kwd>пограничные и территориальные споры и кон- фликты</kwd><kwd>практика международных судебных инстанций</kwd><kwd>uti possidetis</kwd><kwd>transformation of former administrative borders into international boundaries</kwd><kwd>principle of international law</kwd><kwd>boundary and territorial disputes and conﬂ icts</kwd><kwd>the practice of international tribunals</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Международное право. Под ред. А. Н. Вылегжанина А. Н. 3 издание. Том 1. М. Юрайт. 2014. С. 147-155;</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Международное право. Под ред. А. Н. Вылегжанина А. Н. 3 издание. Том 1. М. Юрайт. 2014. С. 147-155;</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hyde C. C., International Law, Chieﬂ y As Interpreted and Applied by the United States (Vol. 1) (Boston, Little, Brown and Company) 1945. P 501-503.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hyde C. C., International Law, Chieﬂ y As Interpreted and Applied by the United States (Vol. 1) (Boston, Little, Brown and Company) 1945. P 501-503.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Crawford J., The Creation of States in International Law (New York, OUP) 2006. P. 107;</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Crawford J., The Creation of States in International Law (New York, OUP) 2006. P. 107;</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dinh N. Q., Daillier P. and Pellet A., Droit International Public (8th edn) (Paris, LGDJ) 2009. P. 573-637.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dinh N. Q., Daillier P. and Pellet A., Droit International Public (8th edn) (Paris, LGDJ) 2009. P. 573-637.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Boczek B.A., International Law: A Dictionary (Lamham, MD, Scarecrow Press) 2005. P. 253-254</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Boczek B.A., International Law: A Dictionary (Lamham, MD, Scarecrow Press) 2005. P. 253-254</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shaw M., International Law (6th edn) (Cambridge, CUP) 2008. P. 527-528.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shaw M., International Law (6th edn) (Cambridge, CUP) 2008. P. 527-528.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jennings R. and Watts A., Oppenheim’s International Law (Vol. I) (9th edn, London/New York, Longman) 1996. P. 669-670.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jennings R. and Watts A., Oppenheim’s International Law (Vol. I) (9th edn, London/New York, Longman) 1996. P. 669-670.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cukwurah A. O. op. cit. P. 112.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cukwurah A. O. op. cit. P. 112.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Corten O., Droit des peuples à disposer d’eux-memes et uti possidetis: deux faces d’une meme medaille? // RBDI № 31. 1998. P. 408.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Corten O., Droit des peuples à disposer d’eux-memes et uti possidetis: deux faces d’une meme medaille? // RBDI № 31. 1998. P. 408.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hasani E., Uti Possidetis Juris: From Rome to Kosovo // Fletcher Forum of World Affairs. 2003. P. 85.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hasani E., Uti Possidetis Juris: From Rome to Kosovo // Fletcher Forum of World Affairs. 2003. P. 85.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dinh N. Q., Daillier P. and Pellet A. Op. cit. P. 573</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dinh N. Q., Daillier P. and Pellet A. Op. cit. P. 573</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Тимченко Л. Д., Правопреемство государств: Опыт конца XX века. Харьков, Университет Внутренних Дел. 1999. C. 39-40.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Тимченко Л. Д., Правопреемство государств: Опыт конца XX века. Харьков, Университет Внутренних Дел. 1999. C. 39-40.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hannum H., Self-Determination, Yugoslavia, and Europe: Old Wine in New Bottles? // Tran L &amp; Contemp Problems № 3. 1993. P. 57-73.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hannum H., Self-Determination, Yugoslavia, and Europe: Old Wine in New Bottles? // Tran L &amp; Contemp Problems № 3. 1993. P. 57-73.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Moore J. B. Op. cit. P. 328.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Moore J. B. Op. cit. P. 328.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lalonde S. N., Determining Boundaries in a Conﬂ icted World: The Role of Uti Possidetis (Montreal, McGill Queens University Press) 2003. P. 11-16;</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lalonde S. N., Determining Boundaries in a Conﬂ icted World: The Role of Uti Possidetis (Montreal, McGill Queens University Press) 2003. P. 11-16;</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Reisman M., Protecting Indigenous Rights in International Adjudication // American Journal of International Law № 89(2). 1995. P. 352.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Reisman M., Protecting Indigenous Rights in International Adjudication // American Journal of International Law № 89(2). 1995. P. 352.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schulz F., Classical Roman Law (Oxford, Clarendon Press) 1951. P. 448.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schulz F., Classical Roman Law (Oxford, Clarendon Press) 1951. P. 448.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lalonde S. N. Op. cit. P. 22.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lalonde S. N. Op. cit. P. 22.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dias Van Dunem F. J., Les Frontiers Africaines (Unpublished PhD dissertation, Universite d’Aix-Marseille) 1969. P. 252-267.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dias Van Dunem F. J., Les Frontiers Africaines (Unpublished PhD dissertation, Universite d’Aix-Marseille) 1969. P. 252-267.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Baty T., Can an Anarchy be a State? // American Journal of International Law № 28 (3). 1934. P. 444-454;</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Baty T., Can an Anarchy be a State? // American Journal of International Law № 28 (3). 1934. P. 444-454;</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lauterpacht H., Oppenheim’s International Law (Vol. II) (7th edn, London, Longman) 1952. P. 598-599</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lauterpacht H., Oppenheim’s International Law (Vol. II) (7th edn, London, Longman) 1952. P. 598-599</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sorel J. M. and Mehdi R., L’Uti Possidetis Entre la Consecration Juridique et la Pratique: Essai de Reactualisation // AFDI № 11. 1994. P. 13;</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sorel J. M. and Mehdi R., L’Uti Possidetis Entre la Consecration Juridique et la Pratique: Essai de Reactualisation // AFDI № 11. 1994. P. 13;</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Campinos P., L’Actualite de l’Uti Possidetis / Societe Francaise pour le Droit International, La Frontiere. 1980. P. 95;</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Campinos P., L’Actualite de l’Uti Possidetis / Societe Francaise pour le Droit International, La Frontiere. 1980. P. 95;</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Alvarez A., Latin America and International Law // American Journal of International Law № 3(2). 1909. P. 269-353; Lalonde S. N. Op. cit. P. 28.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Alvarez A., Latin America and International Law // American Journal of International Law № 3(2). 1909. P. 269-353; Lalonde S. N. Op. cit. P. 28.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Campinos P. Op. cit. P. 95.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Campinos P. Op. cit. P. 95.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Colombia v Venezuela Arbitration [1922] // American Journal of International Law № 16. P. 428; Land, Island and Maritime Frontier Dispute (El Salvador v Honduras) [1992] / ICJ Reports. P. 251, 387.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Colombia v Venezuela Arbitration [1922] // American Journal of International Law № 16. P. 428; Land, Island and Maritime Frontier Dispute (El Salvador v Honduras) [1992] / ICJ Reports. P. 251, 387.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lalonde S. N. Op cit. P. 32.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lalonde S. N. Op cit. P. 32.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hensel P., Allison M. and Khanani A., Territorial Integrity Treaties and Armed Conﬂ ict over Territory / Paper presented at the 2006 Shambaugh Conference ‘Building Synergies: Institutions and Cooperation in World Politics’ / University of Iowa 13 October 2006. URL: http://www.paulhensel.org/Research/cmps09app.pdf.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hensel P., Allison M. and Khanani A., Territorial Integrity Treaties and Armed Conﬂ ict over Territory / Paper presented at the 2006 Shambaugh Conference ‘Building Synergies: Institutions and Cooperation in World Politics’ / University of Iowa 13 October 2006. URL: http://www.paulhensel.org/Research/cmps09app.pdf.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nelson L., The Arbitration of Boundary Disputes in Latina America // Nether I L Rev № 20. 1973. P. 268-271;</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nelson L., The Arbitration of Boundary Disputes in Latina America // Nether I L Rev № 20. 1973. P. 268-271;</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Duran-Bachler S., The Latin American Doctrine of Uti Possidetis (Geneva, Graduate Institute of International Studies) 1972. P. 156-158.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Duran-Bachler S., The Latin American Doctrine of Uti Possidetis (Geneva, Graduate Institute of International Studies) 1972. P. 156-158.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Duran-Bachler S., The Latin American Doctrine of Uti Possidetis (Geneva, Graduate Institute of International Studies) 1972. P. 156-158</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Duran-Bachler S., The Latin American Doctrine of Uti Possidetis (Geneva, Graduate Institute of International Studies) 1972. P. 156-158</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shaw M., Peoples, Territorialism and Boundaries // European Journal of International Law№ 3. 1997. P. 478-507;</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shaw M., Peoples, Territorialism and Boundaries // European Journal of International Law№ 3. 1997. P. 478-507;</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sharma S. P., International Boundary Disputes and International Law: A Policy Oriented Study (2nd edn) (Bombay, Tripathi) 1976. P. 303.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sharma S. P., International Boundary Disputes and International Law: A Policy Oriented Study (2nd edn) (Bombay, Tripathi) 1976. P. 303.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Alvarez A., Latin America and International Law // American Journal of International Law № 3(2). 1909. P. 280;</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Alvarez A., Latin America and International Law // American Journal of International Law № 3(2). 1909. P. 280;</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit35"><label>35</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pradelle D., La Frontière: Etude de Droit International (Paris, Les Editions International) 1928, P. 78.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pradelle D., La Frontière: Etude de Droit International (Paris, Les Editions International) 1928, P. 78.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit36"><label>36</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lauterpacht H., Oppenheim’s International Law (Vol. II) (7th edn, London, Longman) 1952. P. 598-599;</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lauterpacht H., Oppenheim’s International Law (Vol. II) (7th edn, London, Longman) 1952. P. 598-599;</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit37"><label>37</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shaw M., The Heritage of States: the Principle of Uti Possidetis Juris Today / BYBIL № 67. 1996. P. 75-123.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shaw M., The Heritage of States: the Principle of Uti Possidetis Juris Today / BYBIL № 67. 1996. P. 75-123.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit38"><label>38</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Waldock H. M., Disputed Sovereignty in the Falkland Island Dependencies / 25 BYBIL № 25. 1948. P. 224-225.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Waldock H. M., Disputed Sovereignty in the Falkland Island Dependencies / 25 BYBIL № 25. 1948. P. 224-225.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit39"><label>39</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shaw M., Peoples, Territorialism and Boundaries. Opt. cit. P. 478-492.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shaw M., Peoples, Territorialism and Boundaries. Opt. cit. P. 478-492.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit40"><label>40</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ratner S., Drawing Better Line: Uti Possidetis and the Borders of New States // American Journal of International Law № 90. 1996. P. 593-595.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ratner S., Drawing Better Line: Uti Possidetis and the Borders of New States // American Journal of International Law № 90. 1996. P. 593-595.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit41"><label>41</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shaw M., Peoples, Territorialism and Boundaries. Opt. cit. P. 478-507</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shaw M., Peoples, Territorialism and Boundaries. Opt. cit. P. 478-507</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit42"><label>42</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hensel P. and Khanain A., The Colonial Legacy and Border Stability: Uti Possidetis and Territorial Claims in the America. 2004. URL: http://www.paulhensel.org/Research/io05. pdf; Ratner S., Drawing Better Line. Op. cit. P. 593-595</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hensel P. and Khanain A., The Colonial Legacy and Border Stability: Uti Possidetis and Territorial Claims in the America. 2004. URL: http://www.paulhensel.org/Research/io05. pdf; Ratner S., Drawing Better Line. Op. cit. P. 593-595</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit43"><label>43</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shaw M., Peoples, Territorialism and Boundaries. Op. cit. P. 478-492.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shaw M., Peoples, Territorialism and Boundaries. Op. cit. P. 478-492.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit44"><label>44</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kohen M. G., Possession Contestee et Souverainete Territoriale (Paris, PUF). 1997. P. 445.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kohen M. G., Possession Contestee et Souverainete Territoriale (Paris, PUF). 1997. P. 445.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit45"><label>45</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Aufricht H., Guide to League of Nations Publications (New York, Columbia University Press) 1951. P. 292</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Aufricht H., Guide to League of Nations Publications (New York, Columbia University Press) 1951. P. 292</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit46"><label>46</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fisher F. C., The Arbitration of the Guatemalan-Honduras Boundary Dispute // American Journal of International Law № 27(3). 1933. P. 403-427</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fisher F. C., The Arbitration of the Guatemalan-Honduras Boundary Dispute // American Journal of International Law № 27(3). 1933. P. 403-427</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit47"><label>47</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Torres Bernardez S., The ‘Uti Possidetis Juris Principle’ in Historical Perspective / Zemanek K. (ed), Volkerrecht Zwischen Normativem Anspruch und Politischer Realitat (Berlin, Duncker &amp; Humbolt) 1994. P. 432</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Torres Bernardez S., The ‘Uti Possidetis Juris Principle’ in Historical Perspective / Zemanek K. (ed), Volkerrecht Zwischen Normativem Anspruch und Politischer Realitat (Berlin, Duncker &amp; Humbolt) 1994. P. 432</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit48"><label>48</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nesi G., L’uti Possidetis hors de Contexte de la Décolonisation: le cas de l’Europe // AFDI № 44. 1998. P. 1-34</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nesi G., L’uti Possidetis hors de Contexte de la Décolonisation: le cas de l’Europe // AFDI № 44. 1998. P. 1-34</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit49"><label>49</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chime S., The Organization of African Unity and African Boundaries / Widstrand G. G. (ed), African Boundary Problems (Uppsala, Scandinavian Inst. Of African Studies) 1969. P. 165-197.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chime S., The Organization of African Unity and African Boundaries / Widstrand G. G. (ed), African Boundary Problems (Uppsala, Scandinavian Inst. Of African Studies) 1969. P. 165-197.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit50"><label>50</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shaw M., Peoples, Territorialism and Boundaries. Op. cit. P. 478-492.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shaw M., Peoples, Territorialism and Boundaries. Op. cit. P. 478-492.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit51"><label>51</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shaw M., Title to Territory in Africa International Legal Issues (Oxford, Clarendon Press) 1986. P. 185-187.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shaw M., Title to Territory in Africa International Legal Issues (Oxford, Clarendon Press) 1986. P. 185-187.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit52"><label>52</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Touval S., The Boundary Politics of Independent Africa (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press) 1972. P. 86.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Touval S., The Boundary Politics of Independent Africa (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press) 1972. P. 86.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit53"><label>53</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Boutros-Ghali B., The Addis Ababa Charter // International Conciliation № 546. 1964. P. 1-29.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Boutros-Ghali B., The Addis Ababa Charter // International Conciliation № 546. 1964. P. 1-29.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit54"><label>54</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shaw M., Title to Territory in Africa. Op. cit. P. 185-187;</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shaw M., Title to Territory in Africa. Op. cit. P. 185-187;</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit55"><label>55</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Touval S. Op. cit. P. 86.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Touval S. Op. cit. P. 86.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit56"><label>56</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Klabbers J. and Lefeber R., Africa: Lost Between Self-Determination and Uti Possidetis / Brolmann C. (ed), Peoples and Minorities in International Law (London, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers) 1993. P. 37-76.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Klabbers J. and Lefeber R., Africa: Lost Between Self-Determination and Uti Possidetis / Brolmann C. (ed), Peoples and Minorities in International Law (London, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers) 1993. P. 37-76.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit57"><label>57</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Потехин И., Наследство колониализма в Африке // Международная Жизнь № 3. 1964. C. 30-51</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Потехин И., Наследство колониализма в Африке // Международная Жизнь № 3. 1964. C. 30-51</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit58"><label>58</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hurewitz J. C., Introduction: Bounding Mandated Palestine / Toye P. (ed), Palestine Boundaries 1833-1947 (Vol I) (London, Archive Editions) 1989. P. 169-193</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hurewitz J. C., Introduction: Bounding Mandated Palestine / Toye P. (ed), Palestine Boundaries 1833-1947 (Vol I) (London, Archive Editions) 1989. P. 169-193</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
