<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">mgimolaw</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Московский журнал международного права</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Moscow Journal of International Law</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0869-0049</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2619-0893</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Moscow State Institute of International Relations</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24833/0869-0049-2022-2-39-53</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">mgimolaw-2687</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>МЕЖДУНАРОДНОЕ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОЕ ПРАВО</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Правовое регулирование трансграничной несостоятельности (банкротства) в Европейском союзе</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Legal regulation of cross-border insolvency (bankruptcy) in the European Union</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1495-3227</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Войников</surname><given-names>В. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Voynikov</surname><given-names>V. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Вадим Валентинович Войников, доктор юридических наук, профессор кафедры международного и европейского права</p><p>Александра Невского ул., д. 14, Калининград, 236008</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Vadim V. Voynikov, Doctor of Juridical Sciences (Law), Professor at the Chair on International and European Law</p><p>14, ul. A. Nevskogo, Kaliningrad, 236008</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">voinicov@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6811-9708</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Мустафаева</surname><given-names>С. Э.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Mustafaeva</surname><given-names>S. E.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Сабина Элмановна Мустафаева, аспирантка кафедры международного и европейского права</p><p>Александра Невского ул., д. 14, Калининград, 236008</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Sabina E. Mustafaeva, Postgraduate student at the Chair on International and European Law</p><p>14, ul. A. Nevskogo, Kaliningrad, 236008</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">sabinka1644@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Балтийский Федеральный университет им. И. Канта</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Kant Baltic Federal University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2022</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>06</day><month>07</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>39</fpage><lpage>53</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Войников В.В., Мустафаева С.Э., 2022</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2022</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Войников В.В., Мустафаева С.Э.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Voynikov V.V., Mustafaeva S.E.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.mjil.ru/jour/article/view/2687">https://www.mjil.ru/jour/article/view/2687</self-uri><abstract><sec><title>ВВЕДЕНИЕ</title><p>ВВЕДЕНИЕ. Регулирование института трансграничного банкротства в настоящее время приобретает большую актуальность, учитывая глобализацию экономики и интернационализацию предпринимательских отношений. Все чаще заключаются сделки с иностранными контрагентами, покупается имущество за рубежом, крупные организации создают представительства в иностранных государствах. Особую актуальность регулирование трансграничного банкротства имеет на территории ЕС, являющегося интеграционным объединением.</p></sec><sec><title>МАТЕРИАЛЫ И МЕТОДЫ</title><p>МАТЕРИАЛЫ И МЕТОДЫ. Настоящая работа базируется на научных трудах российских и зарубежных исследователей в области международного частного права и европейского права, а также на анализе правовых актов ЕС. Методологическая основа исследования включает в себя разнообразные методы научного познания – общенаучные (анализа и синтеза, индукции и дедукции, системный, метод теоретического моделирования и др.) и специальные юридические (метод юридической интерпретации, сравнительно-правовой и др.).</p></sec><sec><title>РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ</title><p>РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ. Усиленное внимание правовому регулированию трансграничного банкротства на территории ЕС в настоящее время обусловлено стремлением к развитию внешнеэкономических отношений, а также необходимостью устранения существующих пробелов законодательства, препятствующих созданию единого рынка. Являясь одним из компонентов правового сотрудничества по гражданским делам, правовой механизм в области трансграничного банкротства отличается сочетанием двух методов: унификации и гармонизации законодательства.</p></sec><sec><title>ОБСУЖДЕНИЕ И ВЫВОДЫ</title><p>ОБСУЖДЕНИЕ И ВЫВОДЫ. В рамках настоящего исследования авторами рассмотрено само понятие трансграничного банкротства, а также выделены основные характеристики моделей его урегулирования в международном сообществе. Современная правовая система ЕС в области регулирования трансграничного банкротства действует с учетом сложившейся судебной практики, в целях недопущения ущемления прав кредиторов, рассчитывающих на наиболее полное удовлетворение своих требований, сокращения расходов и сроков рассмотрения дел. Меры по гармонизации законодательства ЕС в сфере банкротства в государствах – членах Союза направлены на формирование культуры спасения бизнеса и добросовестного должника.</p></sec></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><sec><title>INTRODUCTION</title><p>INTRODUCTION. The regulation of the institute of cross-border bankruptcy is currently acquiring the greatest relevance, given the globalization of the economy and the internationalization of business relations. In particular, transactions with foreign counter-parties are increasingly being concluded, property is purchased abroad, large organizations establish representative oﬃces in foreign countries. Of particular relevance is the regulation of cross-border bankruptcy in the territory of the EU, which is an integration association. In this connection, the considered problems are of particular relevance.</p></sec><sec><title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title><p>MATERIALS AND METHODS. This study is based on scientiﬁc works of Russian and foreign researchers in the ﬁeld of private international law and European law, as well as on the analysis of EU legal acts. Methodological basis of research includes a variety of methods of scientiﬁc knowledge - general scientiﬁc (analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, systemic, method of theoretical modeling, etc.) and special legal (method of legal interpretation, comparative legal, etc.).</p></sec><sec><title>RESEARCH RESULTS</title><p>RESEARCH RESULTS. Increased attention to the legal regulation of cross-border bankruptcy in the EU territory is currently due to the desire to develop foreign economic relations, as well as the need to eliminate existing gaps in legislation that prevent the creation of a single market. As one of the components of legal cooperation in civil cases, the legal mechanism in the ﬁeld of cross-border bankruptcy is characterized by a combination of two methods: uniﬁcation and harmonization of legislation.</p><p>DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS. In the framework of this article the authors considered the very notion of cross-border bankruptcy, as well as highlighted the main characteristics of the models of its settlement in the international community. Modern EU legal system in the ﬁeld of regulation of cross-border bankruptcy acts taking into account the existing judicial practice, in order to avoid infringement of the rights of creditors, who expect the fullest satisfaction of their claims, reducing costs and timing of the case. Measures to harmonize the EU legislation in the ﬁeld of bankruptcy in the member states of the Union are aimed at creating a culture of business rescue and bona ﬁde debtor.</p></sec></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>трансграничное банкротство</kwd><kwd>Европейский союз</kwd><kwd>пространство свободы</kwd><kwd>безопасности и правосудия ЕС</kwd><kwd>центр основных интересов</kwd><kwd>правовое сотрудничество по гражданским делам</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>cross-border insolvency</kwd><kwd>European Union</kwd><kwd>EU’s Area of freedom</kwd><kwd>security and justice</kwd><kwd>center of main interests</kwd><kwd>legal cooperation in civil matters</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Войников В.В. 2019. Правовое регулирование порядка рассмотрения трансграничных споров по гражданским делам в рамках ЕС. – Актуальные проблемы российского права. № 5. C. 183–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.102.5.183-192</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Arias Varona F.J., Niemi J, Hupli T. Discharge and entrepreneurship in the preventive restructuring directive. – International Insolvency Review. 2020. Vol. 29. Issue 1. P. 8–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/iir.1369</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кузьмина А.П. 2005. Европейская модель трансграничной несостоятельности. – Международное публичное и частное право. № 4. С. 42– 46.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Buﬀord S.L. [et al]. International Insolvency. Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center. 2001. 169 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Леонтьева Е.А., Бахин С.В. 2001. Международно-правовая унификация регулирования трансграничной несостоятельности. – Журнал международного частного права. № 4. С. 15–42.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Buxbaum H.L. Rethinking International Insolvency: the neglected Role of Choice-of-Law Rules and Theory. Stanford Journal of International Law. 2000. Vol. 36. P. 23–72.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Летин А.В. 2003. Трансграничная несостоятельность как объект науки МЧП. – Государство и право. № 8. С. 80-81.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ghio E. [et al.]. Harmonising insolvency law in the EU: New thoughts on old ideas in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. – International Insolvency Review. 2021. Vol. 30. Issue 3. P. 427–459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/iir.1432</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лунц Л.А. 1976. Многонациональные предприятия капиталистических стран в аспекте международного частного права. – Советское государство и право. № 5. С. 122–129.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Horrmann E.A. Nekotorye aspekty garmonizatsii i uniﬁ-katsii chastnogo prava v Evropeiskom soyuze [Some Aspects of the Uniﬁcation and Harmonization of the EU Private Law]. – Moscow Journal of International Law. 2012. No. 4. P. 135–149. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2012-4-135-149</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Михайлова С. А. 2010. Правовое регулирование процедуры трансграничной несостоятельности (банкротства) в Европейском Союзе. – Актуальные проблемы российского права. №1. С. 374–380.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Janger E.J. Virtual Territoriality. – Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. 2010. Vol. 48. Issue 3. P. 401–441.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мохова Е.В. 2016. Трансграничные банкротства за рубежом и в России: в поисках баланса между универсализмом и территориальностью. – Закон. № 5. С. 137–149.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khairyuzov V.V. Nekotorye problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya transgranichnoi nesostoyatel'nosti (bankrotstva) [Some problems of legal regulation of cross-border insolvency (bankruptcy).]. – Pravo i politika. 2006. No. 5. P. 75–81. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Трушников С.С. 2006. Возбуждение производства по делам о несостоятельности в России и Германии. СПб.: Изд. Дом СПбГУ. 197 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kuz'mina A.P. Evropeiskaya model' transgranichnoi nesostoyatel'nosti [European model of cross-border insolvency]. – Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. 2005. No. 4. P. 42–46. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хайрюзов В.В. 2006. Некоторые проблемы правового регулирования трансграничной несостоятельности (банкротства). – Право и политика. № 5. С. 75–81.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Leont'eva E.A., Bakhin S.V. Mezhdunarodno-pravovaya uniﬁkatsiya regulirovaniya transgranichnoi nesostoyatel'nosti [International legal uniﬁcation of the regulation of cross-border insolvency]. – Zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava. 2001. No. 4. P. 15-42. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хоррман Е.А. 2012. Некоторые аспекты гармонизации и унификации частного права в Европейском союзе. – Московский журнал международного права. № 4. С. 135–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/0869-0049-2012-4-135-149</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Letin A.V. Transgranichnaya nesostoyatel'nost' kak ob"ekt nauki MChP [Cross-border insolvency as an object of PIL science]. – Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2003. No. 8. P. 80-81. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Arias Varona F.J., Niemi J, Hupli T. 2020. Discharge and entrepreneurship in the preventive restructuring directive. – International Insolvency Review. Vol. 29. Issue 1. P. 8–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/iir.1369</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">LoPucki L.M. The Case for Cooperative Territoriality in International Bankruptcy. – Michigan Law Review. 2000. Vol. 98. Issue 7. P. 2216–2251.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Buﬀord S.L. [et al]. 2001. International Insolvency. Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center. 169 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lunts L.A. Mnogonatsional'nye predpriyatiya kapitalisticheskikh stran v aspekte mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava [Multinational enterprises of capitalist countries in the aspect of private international law]. – Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1976. No. 5. P. 122–129. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Buxbaum H.L. 2000. Rethinking International Insolvency: the neglected Role of Choice-of-Law Rules and Theory. – Stanford Journal of International Law. Vol. 36. P. 23–72.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mikhailova S. A. Pravovoe regulirovanie protsedury transgranichnoi nesostoyatel'nosti (bankrotstva) v Evropeiskom Soyuze [Legal regulation of the procedure of cross-border insolvency (bankruptcy) in the European Union]. – Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava. 2010. No.1. P. 374–380 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ghio, E. [et al.]. 2021. Harmonising insolvency law in the EU: New thoughts on old ideas in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. – International Insolvency Review. Vol. 30. Issue 3. P. 427–459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/iir.1432</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mokhova E.V. Transgranichnye bankrotstva za rubezhom i v Rossii: v poiskakh balansa mezhdu universalizmom i territorial'nost'yu [Cross-border bankruptcies abroad and in Russia: in search of a balance between universalism and territoriality]. – Zakon. 2016. No. 5. P. 137–149. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Janger E.J. 2010. Virtual Territoriality. – Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. Vol. 48. Issue 3. P. 401–441.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mucciarelli F.M. Private International Law Rules in the Insolvency Regulation Recast: A Reform or a Restatement of the Status Quo?. – Journal European Company and Financial Law Review. 2016. Vol. 13. P.1–30.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">LoPucki L.M. 2000. The Case for Cooperative Territoriality in International Bankruptcy. – Michigan Law Review. Vol. 98. Issue 7. P. 2216–2251.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pepels S. Deﬁning groups of companies under the European Insolvency Regulation (recast): On the scope of EU group insolvency law. – International Insolvency Review. 2021. Vol. 30. Issue 1. P. 96–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/iir.1402</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mucciarelli F.M. 2016. Private International Law Rules in the Insolvency Regulation Recast: A Reform or a Restatement of the Status Quo?. – Journal European Company and Financial Law Review. Vol. 13. P. 1–30.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Trushnikov S.S. Vozbuzhdenie proizvodstva po delam o nesostoyatel'nosti v Rossii i Germanii [Initiation of insolvency proceedings in Russia and Germany.]. Saint Petersburg: Izd. Dom SPbGU Publ. 2006. 197 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pepels S. 2021. Deﬁning groups of companies under the European Insolvency Regulation (recast): On the scope of EU group insolvency law. – International Insolvency Review. Vol. 30. Issue 1. P. 96–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/iir.1402</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tung F. Is International Bankruptcy Possible?. – Michigan Journal of International Law. 2001. Vol. 23. Issue 1. P. 32–102.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tung F. 2001. Is International Bankruptcy Possible? – Michigan Journal of International Law. Vol. 23. Issue 1. P. 32–102.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Voynikov V.V. Pravovoe regulirovanie poryadka rassmotreniya transgranichnykh sporov po grazhdanskim delam v ramkakh ES [Legal regulation of the procedure for handling cross-border disputes in civil matters within the EU]. – Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava. 2019. No. 5. P. 183-192. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.102.5.183-192</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wessels B. 2012. On the future of European Insolvency Law. Brussels. 31 p. URL: https://www.iiiglobal.org/sites/default/ﬁles/futureofeuropeaninsolvencylaw.pdf (accessed 03.03.2022).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wessels B. Cross-Border Insolvency Law in Europe: Present Status and Future Prospects. – Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal. 2008. Vol.11. Issue 1. P. 68– 102.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wessels B. 2008. Cross-Border Insolvency Law in Europe: Present Status and Future Prospects. – Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal. Vol.11. Issue 1. P. 68– 102.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wessels B. On the future of European Insolvency Law. Brussels. 2012. 31 p. URL: https://www.iiiglobal.org/sites/default/ﬁles/futureofeuropeaninsolvencylaw.pdf (accessed 03.03.2022).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Westbrook J.L. 2000. A Global Solution to Multinational Default. -– Michigan Law Review. Vol. 98. Issue 7. P. 2276– 2328.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Westbrook J.L. A Global Solution to Multinational Default. -– Michigan Law Review. 2000. Vol. 98. Issue 7. P. 2276-2328.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Westbrook J.L. 1991a. Choice of Avoidance Law in Global Insolvencies. -– Brooklyn Journal of International Law. Vol. 17. Issue 3. P.499–538.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Westbrook J.L. Choice of Avoidance Law in Global Insolvencies. -– Brooklyn Journal of International Law. 1991a. Vol. 17. Issue 3. P.499–538.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Westbrook J.L. 1991b. Theory and Pragmatism in Global Insolvencies: Choice of Law and Choice of Forum. – American Bankruptcy Law Journal. Vol. 65. P. 457– 490.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Westbrook J.L. Theory and Pragmatism in Global Insolvencies: Choice of Law and Choice of Forum. – American Bankruptcy Law Journal. 1991b. Vol. 65. P. 457– 490.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
