<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">mgimolaw</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Московский журнал международного права</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Moscow Journal of International Law</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0869-0049</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2619-0893</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Moscow State Institute of International Relations</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24833/0869-0049-2009-3-212-225</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">mgimolaw-1130</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>МЕЖДУНАРОДНОЕ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОЕ ПРАВО</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Исключения из принципа наиболее благоприятствуемой нации</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Exceptions to the Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment Principle</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Шепенко</surname><given-names>Р. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Shepenko</surname><given-names>R. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Шепенко Роман Алексеевич – д.ю.н., профессор кафедры административного и финансового права</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Roman A. Shepenko – Doctor of Laws, professor of the Chair of Administrative and Financial law</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">kaifp@mgimo.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>МГИМО (У) МИД России</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>MGIMO-University MFA Russia</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2009</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>09</month><year>2009</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>212</fpage><lpage>225</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Шепенко Р.А., 2009</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2009</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Шепенко Р.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Shepenko R.A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.mjil.ru/jour/article/view/1130">https://www.mjil.ru/jour/article/view/1130</self-uri><abstract><p>Принцип наиболее благоприятствуемой нации провозглашен в п. 1 ст. I. ГАТТ. Согласно этому принципу государство соглашается предоставить договаривающейся стороне режим не менее благоприятный, чем тот, который оно предоставляет другим государствам. Из требований принципа наиболее благоприятствуемой нации допускаются некоторые исключения: например, обобщенная система преференций, неприменение многосторонних торговых соглашений и другие исключения.Предусмотренные исключения из принципа наиболее благоприятствуемой нации представляют собой специфический инструмент, посредством которого обеспечиваются интересы участников и гибкость права, необходимая для успешного функционирования ВТО.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>GATT article I (1) provides for WTO members to accord Most-Favoured-Nation treatment to like products of other WTO members regarding tariffs, regulations on exports and imports, internal taxes and charges, and internal regulations. The MFN is a fundamental principle of the WTO.The GATT and the WTO Agreement provide for certain exceptions to the MFN principle, for example, generalized system of preferences, non-application of multilateral trade agreements and other exceptions. Exceptions guarantee the account of interests of participants and flexibility of the WTO law, but related exceptions need to be carefully administered so as not to undermine the MFN principle.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>ГАТТ</kwd><kwd>ВТО</kwd><kwd>наиболее благоприятствуемая нация</kwd><kwd>исключения из принципа наиболее благоприятствуемой нации</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>GATT</kwd><kwd>WTO</kwd><kwd>Most-Favored-Nation</kwd><kwd>exertions to the MFN principle</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шепенко Р.А. Правовые основы поправки Джексона-Вэника // Законы России: опыт – анализ – практика. 2008. № 12. С. 86-91.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Шепенко Р.А. Правовые основы поправки Джексона-Вэника // Законы России: опыт – анализ – практика. 2008. № 12. С. 86-91.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Inotai A., Sander H. World Trade after the Uruguay Round: Prospects and Policy Options for the Twenty-First Century. N.Y: Routledge, 1996. P. 174.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Inotai A., Sander H. World Trade after the Uruguay Round: Prospects and Policy Options for the Twenty-First Century. N.Y: Routledge, 1996. P. 174.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Michalopoulos C. Developing Countries in the WTO. N.Y.: Palgrave, 2001. P. 225.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Michalopoulos C. Developing Countries in the WTO. N.Y.: Palgrave, 2001. P. 225.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pomfret R. The Economics of Regional Trading Arrangements. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997. P. 71.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pomfret R. The Economics of Regional Trading Arrangements. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997. P. 71.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Recommendations of the Economic Committee relating to Tariff Policy and the Most-Favoured-Nation Clause (E 805.1933.II.B.l.(a). Р. 97-101).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Recommendations of the Economic Committee relating to Tariff Policy and the Most-Favoured-Nation Clause (E 805.1933.II.B.l.(a). Р. 97-101).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
